* Add licences to all example/package.json that lack them
* Revert "Add licences to all example/package.json that lack them"
This reverts commit 5d4e25012f7334772b8ef5924bc355277e827cba.
* Update check-examples to remove `license` field from examples
* Remove `license` from all examples.
This was mentioned in vercel/next.js#27121 but it looks like it didn't end up being in the merge?
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Clean up package.json files in the `examples` directory:
- Add `private: true`
- Remove `version` (because they are irrelevant for packages that are not meant to be published)
- Remove `name` (because they are optional for packages that are not meant to be published, and when someone clones an example, they often rename it and the property becomes stale)
- Remove `author`
- Remove `description`
- Remove `license`
Also remove `with-dynamic-app-layout` example completely, since it does the same as `layout-component` (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/27121#discussion_r668178408).
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
- Fixed the missing prop `components` to `<MDXRemote/>`.
- Added a `defaultComponents` and `source` mdx to provide more clarity on the example.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
This change adds a new example, `with-mdx-remote`, which leverages [`next-mdx-remote`](https://github.com/hashicorp/next-mdx-remote) to use MDX files as content for a dynamic route.
In addition to the basic functionality, the example adds a note about somewhat advanced usage that allows the use of conditionally-loaded custom MDX components.
cc @jescalan
