This updates our `yarn next` command to leverage react v18 by default and removes the need for the test require hook/config modifying when testing react 18. There are some fixtures we need to investigate react 18 support in follow-ups:
- `test/integration/client-navigation-a11y`
- `test/integration/critical-css`
- `test/integration/custom-error-page-exception`
- `test/integration/font-optimization`
- AMP specific tests
* Read the proper page file from either pages directory or from node_modules (inernal pages like _app, _document)
* Only reading page runtime when `reactRoot` is enabled, reduce time for react 17 apps
* fix the dynamic routing of middleware
* add middleware to dynamicRoutes of routes-manifest
* remove unused import
* fix middleware routing with static paths
* update manifest version test
* prevent to match with api route using regex
* use iterator instead of generator
* do not use Iterator
* fix type
* fix type
* remove unused import
* apply the fix for support colons
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Partially implements #31317 and #31506. There're also some trade-offs made with this PR: since we can't know if a certain runtime will be used or not beforehand, we have to start both runtime compilers (Node.js and Edge) and then generate entrypoints correspondingly.
Note that with this PR, the global runtime is still required to use the per-page runtime.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes#34030.
The PR is still WIP as the test case hasn't been added, help or change is welcome.
cc @no-ya @ijjk
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit adds a development mode warning in the console
if you try to include <script> tags in next/head, e.g.
```
<Head>
<script async src="..." />
</Head>
```
The warning message explains that this pattern will not
work well with Suspense/streaming and recommends using the
next/script component instead.
TODO in follow-up PR: add same warning for stylesheets, etc
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
fixes#32178
the `inline-script-id` eslint rule crashed when encountering a `JSXSpreadAttribute`. this pr fixes that, and also handles `id` being passed via the spreaded object.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] ~~Integration~~ Unit tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
We currently have inconsistencies when working with URLs in the Edge Functions runtime, this PR addresses them introducing a warning for inconsistent usage that will break in the future. Here is the reasoning.
### The Browser
When we are in a browser environment there is a fixed location stored at `globalThis.location`. Then, if one tries to build a request with a relative URL it will work using that location global hostname as _base_ to construct its URL. For example:
```typescript
// https://nextjs.org
new Request('/test').url; // https://nextjs.org/test
Response.redirect('/test').headers.get('Location'); // https://nextjs.org/test
```
However, if we attempt to run the same code from `about:blank` it would not work because the global to use as a base `String(globalThis.location)` is not a valid URL. Therefore a call to `Response.redirect('/test')` or `new Response('/test')` would fail.
### Edge Functions Runtime
In Next.js Edge Functions runtime the situation is slightly different from a browser. Say that we have a root middleware (`pages/_middleware`) that gets invoked for every page. In the middleware file we expose the handler function and also define a global variable that we mutate on every request:
```typescript
// pages/_middleware
let count = 0;
export function middleware(req: NextRequest) {
console.log(req.url);
count += 1;
}
```
Currently we cache the module scope in the runtime so subsequent invocations would hold the same globals and the module would not be evaluated again. This would make the counter to increment for each request that the middleware handles. It is for this reason that we **can't have a global location** that changes across different invocations. Each invocation of the same function uses the same global which also holds primitives like `URL` or `Request` so changing an hypothetical `globalThis.location` per request would affect concurrent requests being handled.
Then, it is not possible to use relative URLs in the same way the browser does because we don't have a global to rely on to use its host to compose a URL from a relative path.
### Why it works today
We are **not** validating what is provided to, for example, `NextResponse.rewrite()` nor `NextResponse.redirect()`. We simply create a `Response` instance that adds the corresponding header for the rewrite or the redirect. Then it is **the consumer** the one that composes the final destination based on the request. Theoretically you can pass any value and it would fail on redirect but won't validate the input.
Of course this is inconsistent because it doesn't make sense that `NextResponse.rewrite('/test')` works but `fetch(new NextRequest('/test'))` does not. Also we should validate what is provided. Finally, we want to be consistent with the way a browser behaves so `new Request('/test')` _should_ not work if there is no global location which we lack.
### What this PR does
We will have to deprecate the usage of relative URLs in the previously mentioned scenarios. In preparation for it, this PR adds a validation function in those places where it will break in the future, printing a warning with a link that points to a Next.js page with an explanation of the issue and ways to fix it.
Although middleware changes are not covered by semver, we will roll this for some time to make people aware that this change is coming. Then after a reasonable period of time we can remove the warning and make the code fail when using relative URLs in the previously exposed scenarios.
Noscript is not required for Image that are loaded immediately
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Co-authored-by: Steven <229881+styfle@users.noreply.github.com>
This fixes broken links in the eslint output by removing the trailing full stop.
It also makes the formatting of (the output of) the various rules consistent.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
> I don't think this is a bug, nor a feature, nor is it really documentation.
> It's just a small nuisance that I bumped into and felt compelled to fix.
> I went with documentation as that seems the closest match
## What does this pull request do?
The elslint output of `eslint-plugin-next` contains useful links to the documentation about the various rules.
Unfortunately, on most (but not all) rules, those links are immediately followed by a full stop (`.`).
The terminal (or any parser) has no way of knowing that the full stop is not part of the URL.
So it includes it and clicking the link leads to a 404 on the nextjs.org website.
This PR fixes that by removing the full stop.
## But a final full stop is better grammar
I considered alternatives (such as [a zero-width space character](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-width_space#Prohibited_in_URLs)) in case the final full stop was part of the style guide or something.
However, as I went through the eslint rules, I notices that the messages for various rules were formatted inconsistently.
Some with final full stop, some without.
As such, I made the all consistent with this structure:
> [message]. See: [url]
I feel this is a better solution than using the zero-width space as these sort of invisible characters
in code can be a red flag that something fishy is going on.
I submit this pull request in the hope it will be useful, and a positive contribution to a project I have a great deal of appreciation for.
That being said, I fully understand if people would consider this a non-issue.
When an `a` tag is used to link to an internal page, but the `target="_blank"` attribute is present, ESLint should not report it as an error and should not enforce using `next/link`.
Fixes#28547
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
**Note**: This PR is applying again changes landed #31935 that were reverted from an investigation.
This PR fixes#30398
By default Next will polyfill some fetch APIs (Request, Response, Header and fetch) only if fetch is not found in the global scope in certain entry points. If we have a custom server which is adding a global fetch (and only fetch) at the very top then the rest of APIs will not be polyfilled.
This PR adds a test on the custom server where we can add a custom polyfill for fetch with an env variable. This reproduces the issue since next-server.js will be required without having a polyfill for Response which makes it fail on requiring NextResponse. Then we remove the code that checks for subrequests to happen within the **sandbox** so that we don't need to polyfill `next-server` anymore.
The we also introduce an improvement on how we handle relative requests. Since #31858 introduced a `port` and `hostname` options for the server, we can always pass absolute URLs to the Middleware so we can always use the original `nextUrl` to pass it to fetch. This brings a lot of simplification for `NextURL` since we don't have to consider relative URLs no more.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
People have been reporting on https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/30973 that the `no-server-import-in-page` eslint rule is reporting false positives for `_middleware` files inside sub-page folders.
Unlike `_document`, we can have multiple `_middleware` files.
Fixes#32121
This PR fixes#30398
By default Next will polyfill some fetch APIs (Request, Response, Header and fetch) only if fetch is not found in the global scope in certain entry points. If we have a custom server which is adding a global fetch (and only fetch) at the very top then the rest of APIs will not be polyfilled.
This PR adds a test on the custom server where we can add a custom polyfill for fetch with an env variable. This reproduces the issue since next-server.js will be required without having a polyfill for Response which makes it fail on requiring NextResponse. Then we remove the code that checks for subrequests to happen within the **sandbox** so that we don't need to polyfill `next-server` anymore.
The we also introduce an improvement on how we handle relative requests. Since #31858 introduced a `port` and `hostname` options for the server, we can always pass absolute URLs to the Middleware so we can always use the original `nextUrl` to pass it to fetch. This brings a lot of simplification for `NextURL` since we don't have to consider relative URLs no more.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Previously `response.cookie(name, value, options)` would mutate the passed in `options` which lead to unexpected behaviour as described in #31666.
This PR clones the `options` argument before mutating it.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Since `localhost` is actually an alias for `127.0.0.1` that points to loopback, we should take that into consideration at `NextURL` when we handle local URLs.
The implementation is based on [is-localhost-url](https://github.com/Kikobeats/is-localhost-url); I added some tests over local URLs variations present at the library to ensure other variations are working fine.
Additionally, I refactor some things over the code to avoid doing the same twice and added some legibility that is always welcome when you are working with URLs stuff.
closes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/31533
The rule [`no-html-link-for-pages`](https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/no-html-link-for-pages) will incorrectly flag an `<a>`-tag intended to download a local asset. This PR adds an exception to the rule for any anchor element with a `download` attribute.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
closes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/30353
According with spec, `'about:client'` is the default value is the user doesn't provide it.
It needs to add a test there, looks like there no unit tests for these classes 🤔
* add isEqualNode function
* add test
* trying to make integration test work
* revert
* Update test/unit/is-equal-node.unit.test.js
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
* Revert "revert"
This reverts commit d67b9971068d18efcf839666a3a17619fd914fc3.
* Fix tests
* Use TS for unit test
* Revert waitfor
* Start tests with "should"
* Fix lint
* Use cloneNode()
Co-authored-by: Eric Biewener <eric.biewener0@walmart.com>
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes#30430
There's some more discussion in the issue, but in summary:
- web `Headers` implementation combines all header values with `', '`
- For `Set-Cookie` headers, you're supposed to set them as separate values, not combine them
- web `Headers` forbids the use of `Cookie`, `Set-Cookie` and some more headers, so they don't have custom implementation for those, and still joins them with `,`
- We currently just split them using `split(',')`, but this breaks when the header contains a date (expires, max-age) that also includes a `,`
I used this method to split the Set-Cookie header properly: https://www.npmjs.com/package/set-cookie-parser#splitcookiestringcombinedsetcookieheader as suggested [here](https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/973#issuecomment-559678813)
I didn't add it as a dependency, since we only needed that one method and I wasn't sure what the process is for adding dependencies, so I just added the method in the middleware utils
Make the `no-unwanted-polyfillio` rule respond to the `next/script` component as well as the `script` tag.
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] ~Integration~Unit tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
This PR adds support for [Middleware as per RFC ](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/29750).
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
This refactor is the first of a few changes to support "classic" (two-part)
streaming. This one should be a noop that doesn't actually change the behavior.
It re-organizes the way that functions are wrapped in Document Head/NextScript
so anything that will be part of the second flush can be separated out from the
first flush. It also adds the structure for a useMaybeDeferContent hook, but
currently always assumes that nothing should be deferred.
The next PRs will actually implement streaming.
