Updates our test config to take advantage of more concurrency and also
updates to leverage the playwright docker image to reduce flakes from
actions/setup-node stalling or playwright dependencies stalling on `apt
install`.
This reduces our test times from upwards of 30 minutes down to back
around 15 minutes.
### Update
We removed the `<head>` element checking for root layout in #41621. Since we also need `<head>` for preload in the future, and also css-in-js will require that. We're adding back the `head` element checking to make sure user always provide valid root layout including it.
### Issue
An issue was reported [here](https://github.com/mui/material-ui/issues/34905#issuecomment-1331945868) that the Emotion/MUI site was suffering from FOUC.
After an inspection, I noticed that the SSRed HTML didn't contain the inserted styles at all - despite them being inserted through `useServerInsertedHTML`. I managed to debug it down and discovered that their layout was missing `<head></head>` and thus the stream transformer skipped the insertion altogether cause of this check:
fbc98abab3/packages/next/server/node-web-streams-helper.ts (L177-L183)
I've figured that at the very least we could surface this as a console error in development to nudge the user to fix the missing `<head/>`
cc @huozhi
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
fixes#43392
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- []
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Fixes pnpm w/ example being the only test outside the test suite.
Before:
```ts
describe('create next app', () => {
// ...
})
it('should infer pnpm as the package manager with example', () => { ... })
```
After:
```ts
describe('create next app', () => {
// ...
it('should infer pnpm as the package manager with example', () => { ... })
})
```
## Documentation / Examples
- [X] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
fixes: #41395fixes: #42751.
This PR is a follow-up PR of [PR
43304](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/43304).
This fix works by checking if the page is listed in
middleware-manifest.json's functions, if true then skip the
handleTraceFiles process. This also fixes the two issues aforementioned
by copying files listed in middleware-manifest.json for those pages.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This PR remove `React.useState()` from the `next/image` component. It
was only used in the `onError` case and it was causing Safari to become
very slow when there were many images on the same page. We were seeing
1s delay blocking the main thread when there were about 350 images on
the same page. Chrome and Firefox were not slow.
Related to the build failure from #41931
We need to bundle `next/head` so that it can appear in the
flight-client-manifest, so we changed the behavior to not treat it as
non externals.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
Currently the generated matcher will be `"regexp": "^\(group\)/group$"` for groups which doesn't match the correct route. This is somehow related to #43458, but it only fixes the problem partially. Some other changes need to be made in the build process.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This PR adds proper cleanup step for ~`edgeServerModuleIds`,
`serverModuleIds` and~ `flightCSSManifest`, which was previously
missing. Otherwise it will grow indefinitely during development.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
`export const dynamic = "error"` should only throw if the page actually
didn't get exported during `next build`. Test already exist to make sure
it throws:
`test/integration/app-dynamic-error/app/dynamic-error/page.js`
Fixes#43059
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Previously we stopped transform css-in-js libraries for RSC server layer because it's not encouraged to use them in server components but client components for saving the bytes of RSC payload.
We can detect styled-jsx usage on RSC server layer and error with `client-only` condition, but since it was not transformed properly so it's not erroring properly.
In the future, once styled-components and emotion have `client-only` depepdency integrated so we can re-enable the transform for them on server layer
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
Add ref forwarding for next/image with integration test
- fixes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/42885
- fixes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/18398 (this one was closed with `onLoadingComplete`)
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
Co-authored-by: Steven <229881+styfle@users.noreply.github.com>
The server and client compilers have different external dependency resolution logic. The server prefers CJS while the client prefers ESM by default. This causes an issue when that dependency is a client component entry. We get the module reference during RSC render, which is the CJS file path. And that module reference can't be located in the flight manifest as it was generated via the client compiler (has the ESM path).
This PR changes the entry creation logic to use resolved requests, instead of the raw requests. So both SSR and client will have the same resolved import paths to ensure the module reference consistency.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
fixes#39275 and related issues like #39858 and hopefully #41395 (can't
test because `pnpm next-with-deps build ./dev-app` keeps crashing on
`Collecting page data...` - `useContext` seems to be null, and even
without the changes it still crashes).
This works by checking if the file is an edge function in Next.js's
Webpack plugin `TraceEntryPointsPlugin`, if true then output the nft
file to the output path, if not move up a folder like previously. I
tried changing Webpack config's output.path from `path: !dev &&
isNodeServer ? path.join(outputPath, 'chunks') : outputPath` to `path:
!dev && (isNodeServer || isEdgeServer) ? path.join(outputPath, 'chunks')
: outputPath`, but it just causes the build script to crash because
files like middleware-manifest.json are output to outputPath/chunks
instead of the expected outputPath. So I find this to be the better
solution.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/42812
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/43037
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This PR fixes the issue in which urls from appDir will always not be
found in production when built with `"output": "standalone"` by copying
.next/server/app and .next/server/app-paths-manifest.json into
.next/standalone/server.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This PR improves the RSC plugin for SWC to throw an error when the `"use
client"` directive is in the top level, but not before other statements
/ expressions. For example:
Code:
```js
import 'react'
'use client'
```
Error:
```
The "use client" directive must be placed before other expressions. Move it to the top of the file to resolve this issue.
,----
3 | 'use client'
: ^^^^^^^^^^^^
`----
```
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Use `WellKnownErrorsPlugin` when formatting `@next/font` errors.
The error handling is different for expected errors (like validation
errors) and unknown ones. If the error is expected it just displays the
formatted error message. If it's an unknown error it will also display
the stacktrace, and in case the versions of `@next/font` and `next` are
different it will encourage you to try to update them both.
Removes the usage of `error-loader` when importing from
`pages/_document.js`, handle that case with `WellKnownErrorsPlugin` as
well.
The current warning when using different versions is removed. If the
versions are incompatible you'll get an error in the overlay instead.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This PR is companion to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/42656.
Previous PR https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/41908 allowed to set up integration / e2e tests spawn `next dev` with `--turbo` as needed. This PR leverages those, change all the tests suites to run with `--turbo`. One additional change is it can be configured dynamically via env variable. Setting env `__INTERNAL_NEXT_DEV_TEST_TURBO_GLOB_MATCH` to glob pattern will selectively enables tests to run with --turbo, normally it'll skip and only current devserver will be used.
These changes allow gradual integration between https://github.com/vercel/turbo to next.js. Plan is to run these tests with latest turbopack dev branch. Each time turbopack fixes / implements changes to enable certain set of tests, its CI will change its env variable without manually patching next.js's test cases. Once those change goes to upstream `next-swc` those tests can be permanantly enabled.
For those reasons, PR have somewhat verbose changes to touch individual test cases runs devserver. Changed file counts are lot, but mostly identical changes.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
The edge runtime should all use esm assets to keep the hooks and the react context are matched
Fixes: #43080
The issue is caused by the app router context and server inserted html context are not aligned. One side is using esm and other side is using the cjs asset.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
In #41548, I show that I would like to provide an object with images in
getStaticProps. The StaticImageData is parsed correctly and provided as
a prop to the page. Nonetheless, the image is not available in the
static directory. Therefore the image is not shown. This is also
addressed in issue #29571. The underlying cause is that the import of
the image is removed from the client bundle and only present in the
server bundle.
Evaluating the next-image-loader shows that the file is only placed in
the static directory if emitted from the client bundle by firing
this.emitFile. By changing this to only emitting the file from the
serverside bundle in the webpackloader, static images loaded in the
getStaticProps are made available properly as well as images directly
used in componts (so present in server and client bundle).
This would PR would prevent the circumventing solution which enforces
that the StaticImageData should be present in the client side bundle
while it will also be present in the staticprops.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Closes#42783, Fixes#42443
Co-authored-by: Diederik <diederik@digitalpatrol.nl>
When creating the client entries, the `src/` prefix shouldn't be included in the entrypoint's name. Closes#42874.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Currently in dev the `_devPagesManifest` includes the `/app` routes as
well. However, In production, the `_buildManifest.js` does not include
the `/app` routes. This causes the `/pages` router to behave differently
in the two environments.
This change excludes the `/app` routes from `_devPagesManifest` to make
it work the same in dev/prod.
Fixes#42513Fixes#42532
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Fixes#41995Closes#43144
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: Bruno Nascimento <bruno.hn@icloud.com>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
When using custom document and importing from `next/document`,
`HtmlContext` instance will mismatch due to CJS version of
`next/document` is consumed. Gotta alias it to the ESM version for edge
runtime
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
As discussed [here](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C035J346QQL/p1668425692084449), we don't need the timestamp for CSS resources in the app dir for now as we are not preloading them. Manually tested with Safari and added corresponding e2e tests.
Closes#42862.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Fix: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/42398
relates to
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/42626#pullrequestreview-1172032873
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
