For a more detailed explanation of the algorithm, refer to the comments
in ppr-navigations.ts. Below is a high-level overview.
### Step 1: Render the prefetched data immediately
Immediately upon navigation, we construct a new Cache Node tree (i.e.
copy-on-write) that represents the optimistic result of a navigation,
using both the current Cache Node tree and data that was prefetched
prior to navigation.
At this point, we haven't yet received the navigation response from the
server. It could send back something completely different from the tree
that was prefetched — due to rewrites, default routes, parallel routes,
etc.
But in most cases, it will return the same tree that we prefetched, just
with the dynamic holes filled in. So we optimistically assume this will
happen, and accept that the real result could be arbitrarily different.
We'll reuse anything that was already in the previous tree, since that's
what the server does.
New segments (ones that don't appear in the old tree) are assigned an
unresolved promise. The data for these promises will be fulfilled later,
when the navigation response is received.
The tree can be rendered immediately after it is created. Any new trees
that do not have prefetch data will suspend during rendering, until the
dynamic data streams in.
### Step 2: Fill in the dynamic data as it streams in
When the dynamic data is received from the server, we can start filling
in the unresolved promises in the tree. All the pending promises that
were spawned by the navigation will be resolved, either with dynamic
data from the server, or `null` to indicate that the data is missing.
A `null` value will trigger a lazy fetch during render, which will then
patch up the tree using the same mechanism as the non-PPR implementation
(serverPatchReducer).
Usually, the server will respond with exactly the subset of data that
we're waiting for — everything below the nearest shared layout. But
technically, the server can return anything it wants.
This does _not_ create a new tree; it modifies the existing one in
place. Which means it must follow the Suspense rules of cache safety.
## To Do
Not all necessarily PR-blocking, since the status quo is that
navigations don't work at all when PPR is enabled
- [x] Figure out how to handle dynamic metadata. Need to switch from
prefetched metadata to final.
- [x] Some mistake related to parallel routes, need to look into failing
tests
Closes NEXT-1894
### What?
Navigating to a layout that is part of a route group that uses route
interception currently will trigger a 404 error if the route group
doesn't define a `default` segment.
### Why?
When `next-app-loader` injects fallback defaults into the loader tree,
it does so by first seeing if a default already exists. However it does
this without ignoring route groups, meaning if you have a
`/app/default.tsx` and your interception route is at
`/app/(level1)/(level2)`, it will look for the default at
`/app/(level1)/(level2)/default.tsx`.
When a `default` isn't found, the fallback behavior is to trigger a
`notFound()` error. This means navigating to the intercepting route that
has no `default` for the `children` segment will 404.
### How?
This adjusts the fallback behavior by attempting to find the `default`
by normalizing the segment path, which will ignore route groups. That
way `/app/(level1)/(level2)/default` will first check `/app/default.tsx`
before falling back to `notFound` behavior.
Fixes#59279
Closes NEXT-1813
### What?
There are a bunch of different bugs caused by the same underlying issue,
but the common thread is that performing any sort of router cache update
(either through `router.refresh()`, `revalidatePath()`, or `redirect()`)
inside of a parallel route would break the router preventing subsequent
actions, and not resolve any pending state such as from `useFormState`.
### Why?
`applyPatch` is responsible for taking an update response from the
server and merging it into the client router cache. However, there's
specific bailout logic to skip over applying the patch to a
`__DEFAULT__` segment (which corresponds with a `default.tsx` page).
When the router detects a cache node that is expected to be rendered on
the page but contains no data, the router will trigger a lazy fetch to
retrieve the data that's expected to be there
([ref](5adacb6912/packages/next/src/client/components/layout-router.tsx (L359-L370)))
and then update the router cache once the data resolves
([ref](5adacb6912/packages/next/src/client/components/layout-router.tsx (L399-L404))).
This is causing the router to get stuck in a loop: it'll fetch the data
for the cache node, send the data to the router reducer to merge it into
the existing cache nodes, skip merging that data in for `__DEFAULT__`
segments, and repeat.
### How?
We currently assign `__DEFAULT__` to have `notFound()` behavior when
there isn't a `default.tsx` component for a particular segment. This
makes it so that when loading a page that renders a slot without slot
content / a `default`, it 404s. But when performing a client-side
navigation, the intended behavior is different: we keep whatever was in
the `default` slots place, until the user refreshes the page, which
would then 404.
However, this logic is incorrect when triggering any of the above
mentioned cache node revalidation strategies: if we always skip applying
to the `__DEFAULT__` segment, slots will never properly handle reducer
actions that rely on making changes to their cache nodes.
This splits these different `applyPatch` functions: one that will apply
to the full tree, and another that'll apply to everything except the
default segments with the existing bailout condition.
Fixes#54173Fixes#58772Fixes#54723Fixes#57665
Closes NEXT-1706
Closes NEXT-1815
Closes NEXT-1812
## What?
Ensures `Object.entries` is not called on the `Map`. Seems this only
fails in a very particular case but potentially this fixes other issues
than the one I added in the tests too.
## How?
`Object.entries()` results in an empty array when called on a `Map`.
Created a shared type declaration for the value and removed the
`Object.entries`. Benefit of this is that we can skip the loop as well.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
This fixes some of headers (and adds associated tests) for pages when
PPR is enabled. Namely, the `Cache-Control` headers are now returning
correctly, reflecting the non-cachability of some requests:
- Requests that postpone (dynamic data is streamed after the initial
static shell is streamed)
- Requests for the Dynamic RSC payload
Additionally, the `X-NextJS-Cache` header has been updated for better
support for PPR:
- Requests that postpone no longer return this header as it doesn't
reflect the cache state of the request (because it streams)
- Requests for the Prefetch RSC now returns the correct cache headers
depending on the segment and pre-postpone state
This also enables the other pathnames in the test suites 🙌🏻
Closes NEXT-1840
## What?
Adds two tests for server actions returning client components:
- (supported) Importing a server action from a server component. That
server action imports a client component and returns it.
- (not supported yet) Importing a server action from a client component.
The server action imports a client component and returns it.
The second case is not supported yet as it would effectively mean a
compilation loop:
`server` -> `client` -> `server` -> `client`
and if that last client component includes another server action it goes
even further:
`server` -> `client` -> `server` -> `client` -> `server` (and if that
server action includes anothe client component it goes further and
further)
Whereas currently it's only `server` -> `client` -> `server`, so it's
limited to that.
In the future we should be able to support this
server->client->server->client loop in Turbopack specifically because
Turbopack has a single module graph.
Importing the client component in a server action that is defined in the
server compiler (i.e. when created inline or when imported from a server
component) it does work correctly already.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Closes NEXT-1873
This ensures that `export const dynamic = 'force-static'` is properly
honored when a page contains fetches with `cache: 'no-store'`, `cache:
'no-cache'` or `next: { revalidate: 0 }`.
Closes NEXT-1858
Before PPR, the way instant navigations work in Next.js is we prefetch
everything up to the first route segment that defines a loading.js
boundary. The rest of the tree is defered until the actual navigation.
It does not take into account whether the data is dynamic — even if the
tree is completely static, it will still defer everything inside the
loading boundary.
The approach with PPR is different — we prefetch as deeply as possible,
and only defer when dynamic data is accessed. If so, we only defer the
nearest parent Suspense boundary of the dynamic data access, regardless
of whether the boundary is defined by loading.js or a normal <Suspense>
component in userspace.
This PR removes the partial behavior of loading.js when the PPR flag is
enabled. In effect, loading.js now acts like a regular Suspense boundary
with no additional special behavior.
Note that in practice this usually means we'll end up prefetching more
than we were before PPR, which may or may not be considered a
performance regression by some apps. The plan is to address this before
General Availability of PPR by introducing granular per-segment
fetching, so we can reuse as much of the tree as possible during both
prefetches and dynamic navigations. But during the beta period, we
should be clear about this trade off in our communications.
## Testing strategy
While I was writing a test, I noticed that it's currently pretty
difficult to test all the scenarios that PPR is designed to handle, so I
gave special attention to setting up a testing strategy that I hope will
make this easier going forward. The overall pattern is based on how
we've been testing concurrent rendering features in the React repo for
many years:
- In the e2e test, spin up an HTTP server for responding to requests
sent by the test app. This simulates the data service that would be used
in a real Next.js application, whether it's direct db access, an ORM, or
a higher-level data access layer. The e2e test can observe when
individual requests are received, and control the timing of when the
data is fulfilled, without needing to mock any lower level I/O. (We're
already using a similar pattern to [test fetch
deduping](a3616d33ed/test/e2e/app-dir/app-fetch-deduping/app-fetch-deduping.test.ts (L8-L29)).)
- Each time a request is received, write to an event log. Then assert on
the result of the log at different points throughout the test. This
helps catch subtle mistakes where the order of events is not expected,
or the same event happens more than it should.
(I wrote some test helpers, but to avoid early abstraction, I've
intentionally not moved them into a separate module.)
Closes NEXT-1779
### What?
switch turbopack to use a single client components entrypoint for all
client components on a page for development. This aligns it with the
webpack behavior.
### Why?
compiling a separate entrypoint for every client component is pretty
expensive in regards of compilation, chunking, code generation, file
writing and number of requests.
### Turbopack Changes
* https://github.com/vercel/turbo/pull/6713 <!-- Tobias Koppers - use
real emojis -->
* https://github.com/vercel/turbo/pull/6728 <!-- Tobias Koppers - fix
order of reverse topologic iteration -->
Closes PACK-2115
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes#58087
-->
fixes#58087
Currently in Next 14, everyone has fullURL flag turned to true, this PR
reverts the condition.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <inbox@huozhi.im>
### What?
While scrolled on a page, and when following a link to a new page and
clicking the browser back button or using `router.back()`, the scroll
position would sometimes restore scroll to the incorrect spot (in the
case of the test added in this PR, it'd scroll you back to the top of
the list)
### Why?
The refactor in #56497 changed the way router actions are processed:
specifically, all actions were assumed to be async, even if they could
be handled synchronously. For most actions this is fine, as most are
currently async. However, `ACTION_RESTORE` (triggered when the
`popstate` event occurs) isn't async, and introducing a small amount of
delay in the handling of this action can cause the browser to not
properly restore the scroll position
### How?
This special-cases `ACTION_RESTORE` to synchronously process the action
and call `setState` when it's received, rather than creating a promise.
To consistently reproduce this behavior, I added an option to our
browser interface that'll allow us to programmatically trigger a CPU
slowdown.
h/t to @alvarlagerlof for isolating the offending commit and sharing a
minimal reproduction.
Closes NEXT-1819
Likely addresses #58899 but the reproduction was too complex to verify.
## What?
- Add support for `experimental.externalDir` -- Was already supported,
just makes Turbopack not fail on that config option
- Skipped `with-babel` test because it tests Babel
- Skipped `swc-warnings` test because it tests Babel
- Skipped `config-resolve-alias` as it tests webpack config
- Skipped `undefined-webpack-config` as it tests webpack config
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Closes NEXT-1817
### What?
Visiting an edge catch-all route incorrectly truncates multiple
parameters
### Why?
The params are currently coerced into a `ParsedURLQuery`-like format by
calling `Object.fromEntries` on `searchParams`, but this doesn't
consider multiple param values assigned to the same key
### How?
Rather than use `fromEntries`, this uses an existing util to get the
path into `ParsedURLQuery` format.
Closes NEXT-1814
Fixes#59333
### What?
When running a
[multi-zone](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/tree/canary/examples/with-zones)
app in dev, app pages would infinitely reload
### Why?
The HMR upgrade request would fail and get caught into a retry loop. In
the multi-zone case, they fail because the upgrade request would be sent
again for a request that had already been upgraded. This resulted in a
"server.handleUpgrade() was called more than once with the same socket"
error, causing the upgrade request to fail.
Every time a retry occurred, the page would trigger a full refresh since
certain HMR errors cause the browser to reload.
### How?
This ensures the upgrade handler only responds to requests that match
the configured basePath.
Closes NEXT-1797
Fixes#59161Fixes#56615Fixes#54454
This makes some critical modifications to the app render pipeline when
PPR has been enabled for pages with segments defining:
```js
export const dynamic = "force-dynamic"
```
Importantly, it no longer modifies the revalidation time to zero for
those pages, and now falls back to the provided default revalidation
time. When static render occurs, if the page being rendered has a
segment config defining `dynamic === "force-dynamic"`, then it will
postpone at the root of the component tree. This ensures that no render
code is executed for the page, as the entirety of the tree will have
postponed. This fixes the bug where the flight prefetch wasn't generated
correctly as well.
### What?
Using an interception marker next to a dynamic segment does not behave
properly when deployed to Vercel
### Why?
The named route regex that gets created is not accounting for the
interception marker, which is causing the non-intercepted route to match
the intercepted serverless function.
### How?
This factors in the interception marker when building the named route
regex so that the non-intercepted route regex properly matches when
loading the non-intercepted page.
Deployment verified here: https://test-intercept-mu.vercel.app/
Closes NEXT-1786
Fixes#54650
## What?
Skips more tests that are running `next build` which is not supported by
Turbopack yet.
## How?
Used an approach where all `next build` tests would fail if
`TURBOPACK=1` is set, which is how the tests run. This highlighted the
cases `next build` was still running.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Closes NEXT-1791
### What?
When using a server action on an intercepted route, when submitting that
action, you'd expect it to correspond with the page you're currently on.
However if you have route interception set up, and you load the page
rather than the intercepted page, submitting the action would `POST` to
the intercepted page. This would result in a 404 error because the
action ID you're attempting to submit wouldn't be found on the requested
page.
### Why?
Interception routes rely on the `Next-Url` request header to determine
if an interception should occur via a rewrite. However, server actions
are submitted with this header as well, so the rewrite will be applied
to the `POST` request corresponding with a non-existent action, or an
action on the intercepted page.
### How?
When loading a page that has an intercepted route, `nextUrl` should be
consistent with URL derived from the flight router state tree. But when
an interception occurs via navigation, `nextUrl` will now deviate. I'm
using this to determine whether or not `Next-Url` should be forwarded
along in the `POST` request.
Closes NEXT-1436
Fixes#52591Fixes#49934
### What?
When using rewrites, in the scenario where a user visits an intercepted
route, reloads the page, goes back, and then revisits the same route, we
serve the page rather than the intercepted route.
### Why?
#59094 fixed the case where `ACTION_RESTORE` was not restoring `nextUrl`
properly. However there's a separate issue where when the `SERVER_PATCH`
action comes in, `handleMutable` attempts to compute `nextUrl` by
comparing the patched tree with the current tree. In the case of the
popstate event, both trees are the same, so the logic is currently
configured to fallback to `canonicalUrl`, which is not the correct URL
to use in the case of rewrites.
### How?
If the computed changed path is null, we should only fallback to using
`canonicalUrl` if we don't have a valid `nextUrl` that we can use.
Closes NEXT-1747
Fixes#56072
### What?
When using interception routes & rewrites, on first interception the
router will properly handle the request. But when using the back button
and attempting another interception, it won't work
### Why?
Intercepting routes rely on the accuracy of `nextUrl` -- but when
`ACTION_RESTORE` is dispatched (in the `popstate` event), `nextUrl` is
restored from `url.pathname` rather than the flight router state.
### How?
This uses the `extractPathFromFlightRouterState` util which will
properly handle setting `nextUrl`. This util is also used when creating
the initial router state.
Closes NEXT-1747
Fixes#56072
### What?
When handling a server action, in the non-progressive enhanced case,
React will attempt to parse the request body before verifying if a valid
server action is received. This results in an "Error: Connection Closed"
error being thrown, rather than ignoring the action and failing more
gracefully
### Why?
To support progressive enhancement with form actions, the `actionId`
value is added as a hidden input in the form, so the action ID from the
header shouldn't be verified until determining that we've reached the
non-PE case. ([React
ref](https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/26774)). However, in
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/49187, support was added for a
URL encoded form (which is not currently used, as indicated on the PR).
Despite it not being used for server actions, it's currently possible to
trigger this codepath, ie by calling redirect in an action handler with
a 307/308 status code with some data in the URL. This would result in a
500 error.
### How?
React should not attempt to parse the URL encoded form data until after
we've verified the server action header for the non-PE case.
x-ref NEXT-1733
[Slack
context](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03S8ED1DKM/p1700674895218399?thread_ts=1700060786.749079&cid=C03S8ED1DKM)
### What?
A `redirect` that occurs during a fetch action will get a status code of
200, while the redirection logic is handled client-side.
### Why?
In this scenario, the redirect is handled by the client router, so no
`Location` is set on the action response. However for debugging /
logging purposes, it'd be useful to still return the same status code
used in other cases (see #58885)
### How?
Rather than selectively setting the status to 303 in the non-fetch
action case, this always applies it.
Closes NEXT-1745
### What?
Calling `redirect` or `permanentRedirect` with a route handler used by a server action will result in that POST request following the redirect. This could result in unexpected behavior, such as re-submitting an action (in the case where the redirected URL makes use of the same server action).
### Why?
By spec, 307 and 308 status codes will attempt to reuse the original request method & body on the redirected URL.
### How?
In all cases when calling a `redirect` handler inside of an action, we'll return a `303 See Other` response which is a typical status code when redirecting to a success / confirmation page as a result of a POST/PUT.
The other option would be to use 301 / 302 status codes, but since we're already doing a 303 status code [here](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/packages/next/src/server/app-render/action-handler.ts#L603), this aligns the behavior for the route handler case.
Closes NEXT-1733
See also: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/51592#issuecomment-1810212676
[Slack x-ref](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03S8ED1DKM/p1700060786749079)
### What?
When the router action queue receives a bunch of async actions in quick succession, some of those requests are dropped, and as a result, anything observing pending transitions will be stuck in a pending state.
### Why?
When adding items to the action queue, the intended behavior is for new actions to be added to the end of the action queue, to be picked up by `runRemainingActions` once the in-flight action is processed. However, new actions are erroneously overwriting pending actions in the queue rather than appending them, as `actionQueue.last` might have a pending action attached to it.
### How?
This moves the assignment of `actionQueue.last` to always be in `dispatchAction`, rather than the function that processes the action, so that we always have a single spot where `last` is assigned and to prevent it from erroneously omitted/overwritten.
Fixes#59011
### What?
We currently dedupe fetch requests, but if those fetch requests contain a `revalidate` time, when that window is expired all of those fetches will be invoked without deduping.
### Why?
We track revalidations on the `staticGenerationStore` but we don't have a way to dedupe them, as it's currently just an array. When the (patched) fetch is invoked and catches a stale entry, it'll push each fetch onto the `pendingRevalidates` array which will later be invoked via `Promise.all`.
### How?
This updates the shape of `pendingRevalidates` to be a map, that way we can reliably dedupe if we see a key that is already pending revalidation.
Closes NEXT-1744
[slack x-ref](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03S8ED1DKM/p1700836529460289)
Utils `stringToUint8Array` and `arrayBufferToString` assume that the values are just arbitrary fixed width data. However that doesn't work when we do unicode concatenation (`actionId + arg`) which requires Text encoder/decoder to be used.
Closes#58463, closes#58579. In general any complex unicode characters will cause the same issue, for example emojis.
## What?
Was investigating an issue with Turbopack and MDX, in the process found
a few bugs:
- When you have a `tsconfig.json` or `jsconfig.json` the `baseUrl: '.'`
is used by default which causes the top-level directories to be
available as e.g. `design-system` (without a prefix).
- This is not how TypeScript's default setting for `baseUrl` works.
While it should resolve `paths` relative to `.` when none is specified
it does not do additional resolving for the top level directories/files.
- When `"baseUrl": "."` is added to `tsconfig.js` explicitly it handles
the top level directories.
- `modularizeImports` and other SWC transforms weren't applied to `.mdx`
files when `experimental.mdxRs` is enabled, which caused compilation to
fail.
- `modularIzeImports` and other SWC transforms are not applied to `.mdx`
files when using Turbopack.
- @kwonoj is investigating this, will be handled in a follow-up PR.
## How?
- Added a test suite for `modularizeImports` with MDX tests
- Removed the condition that disables swcLoader in webpack when using
mdxRs
- Changed the check for `tsconfig.json` / `jsconfig.json` baseUrl to
include if it was implicitly or explicitly set, disabled the module
resolving when it is implicitly set
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Tobias Koppers <tobias.koppers@googlemail.com>
* Add docs link to the warning, add codemod link to viewport docs section
* Only log the warning once after the metadata resolving process, this will avoid multiple duplicated logs showing for one page.
Closes NEXT-1723
### What?
Rewrites to an edge route currently throw an invariant rather than properly serving up the page that is rewritten to.
### Why?
The `NextRequest` object that is provided to the edge route handler contains pathname information only for the "origin" request (e.g., when visiting `/one/example` which rewrites to `/two/example`, the pathname is still `/one/example`. This hits an invariant since the route matcher is unable to find `/one/example` since it does not exist.
### How?
This updates the module wrapper to grab the pathname from the route definition rather than the request object. For dynamic segments, we extract them from `request.nextUrl` since we know that even if `nextUrl` is referencing the origin path, the parameters it has are relevant for the rewrite.
This adds the `getUtils` utility that's also used in base-server to handle the URL normalization, which also provides an interface for normalizing dynamic params from a `ParsedUrlQuery`.
Closes NEXT-1724
Fixes#48295
This PR fixes an issue where users would try to access `req.cookies` from a route handler and be unable to read from it.
This issue was caused by `req.cookies` not opting you into dynamic behaviour, unlike `cookies()` from `next/headers`. This fixes it.
### What?
When a layout segment forces dynamic rendering (such as with
`force-dynamic` or `revalidate: 0`), navigating to sub-pages of that
layout will attempt to re-render the layout, also resulting in side
effects re-running. This means if your layout relies on a data fetch and
you render the result of that data in the layout, it will unexpectedly
change when navigating between sub-paths, as described in #57326.
As a separate issue (but caused by the same underlying mechanism), when
using `searchParams` on a dynamic page, changes to those search params
will be erroneously ignored when navigating, as described in #57075
### Why?
As a performance optimization we generate static prefetch files for
dynamic segments ([original
PR](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/54403)). This makes it so
that when prefetching is turned on, the prefetch can be served quickly
from the edge without needing to invoke unnecessarily. We're able to
eagerly serve things that can be safely prefetched. This is nice for
cases where a path has a `loading.js` that we can eagerly render while
waiting for the dynamic data to be loaded.
This causes a problem with layouts that opt into dynamic rendering: when
the page loads and a prefetch is kicked off for the sub-page, it'll load
the static prefetch, which won't be generated with the same router state
as the dynamically rendered page. This causes a mismatch between the two
trees, and when navigating within the same segment, a refetch will be
added to the router because it thinks that it's navigating to a new
layout.
This also causes issues for dynamic pages that use `searchParams`. The
static prefetch will be generated without any knowledge of search
params, and when the prefetch occurs, we still match to the prefetch
generated without search params. This will make the router think that no
change occurs, and the UI will not update to reflect the change.
### How?
There's ongoing work by @acdlite to refactor the client router.
Hopefully it will be easier to re-land this once that work is finished.
For now, I've reverted the behavior as it doesn't seem to be worth the
bugs it currently causes. I've also added tests so that when we do
re-land this behavior, we can catch these subtleties.
Fixes#57326Fixes#57075
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
### What?
I changed the behavior of fetch() when 'force-dynamic' is specified in the `dynamic` of Route Segment Config to be similar to when 'force-no-store' is specified in `fetchCache`.
### Why?
The document (https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/file-conventions/route-segment-config#dynamic) contains an explanation that when 'force-dynamic' is specified for `dynamic`, it will behave equivalently to the following:
> Setting the segment config to export const fetchCache = 'force-no-store'
I tried to correct it because it was not actually behaving this way.
### How?
When determining if `fetchCache` is 'force-no-store', I have modified the code to also check the `dynamic` setting.
Fixes#47033
Co-authored-by: Zack Tanner <1939140+ztanner@users.noreply.github.com>
### What?
When using a `Request` object with fetch, we'll log a warning indicating that using the `cache` property in addition to `revalidate` is unsupported.
### Why?
`Request` sets some defaults on the request init, such as `cache: "default"`. This makes the warning confusing and there's no way to avoid it aside from switching the resource argument to be a URL string instead.
### How?
This keeps existing behavior but omits the log in the case where a request object is used and no explicit cache overrides are specified.
Fixes#58109
### Issue
In the client components world, when you're using `next/dynamic` with `ssr: false` to split chunks in pages of edge runtime, you could get the dynamic imported module still bundled in the server bundle for edge runtime. This could easily hit the bundle limit on edge runtime if you're loading a large size of non-SSR module.
This is caused by the whole chunk is still being included when we're creating the client entry. Since the client entry is imported eagerily, webpack will bundle all the modules under it, unless it's explicitly marked not being included.
### Fix
For client components, SSR rendering layer of bundle, non-SSR `next/dynamic` calls, we're transform the result of `dynamic()` call from to conditional import the dynamic loaded module.
From
```js
dynamic(() => import(...))
```
To
```js
dynamic(() => {
require.resolveWeak(...)
}, { ssr: false })
```
This will only be applied to SSR layer bundle client components non-SSR `next/dynamic` calls and only when webpack is bundling since turbopack doesn't need this. In this way, the server side will be stripped but it can still enter the module graph since we need to traverse if there's SA in client modules with using webpack API `require.resolveWeak`. And for client side bundle will still include the actual module.
Close NEXT-1703
Co-authored-by: @BRKalow <bryce@clerk.dev>
### What?
A number of our customers have been experiencing issues stemming from an
`x-forwarded-host` header that doesn't match the `host` header.
### Why?
[This PR](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/57815) removes
functionality which sets `x-forwarded-host` to `req.headers['host']` and
relies solely on the server's hostname and port.
This can be seen locally when visiting the app via a localhost
subdomain.
The `x-forwarded-host` header will remain as `localhost:${port}` while
the actual requested host will contain the subdomain.
### Related
- https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/57815#issuecomment-1808496790
---------
Co-authored-by: BRKalow <bryce@clerk.dev>
Co-authored-by: Zack Tanner <zacktanner@gmail.com>
### What?
When navigating between pages (via `prefetch: false`) within a dynamic
segment, the shared layout is re-rendered. This can cause unexpected
behavior like layout data changing when navigating between child
segments.
### Why?
When prefetch is false, we're currently opting into an "optimistic
navigation" codepath, which will optimistically render layout-routers up
to the point where data is missing, while kicking off data fetches. It
attempts to determine where refetching needs to happen by traversing the
router cache nodes and checking where data is missing. However, it
locates these cache nodes by using "segments" obtained by
[deconstructing the
URL](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/fix/optimistic-bailout/packages/next/src/client/components/router-reducer/reducers/navigate-reducer.ts#L142),
which won't accurately contain dynamic segment data. For ex, `/en` which
corresponds with `/app/[lang]/page.tsx` will have a cache node key of
`lang|en|d`, not `en`. Similarly, the optimistic tree that gets
constructed will also be incorrect, since it uses the URL segment.
### How?
My initial fix was to match the dynamic segment against the segment
constructed by the URL. But after discussion with @sebmarkbage and the
team, it seems more correct to remove the optimistic case all together
as there's no guarantee that the url will actually match to that
segment.
Fixes#50670
---------
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
### What?
Using `revalidateTag` or `revalidatePath` in a route handler will not
currently opt the handler into dynamic behavior. This means that if you
use these APIs and don't opt into dynamic behavior by some other means,
the revalidation call won't do anything as the route handler will be
served statically.
### Why?
During static generation, we do not currently indicate that usage of
these APIs should opt into dynamic usage.
### How?
This updates `revalidateTag` to throw a `DynamicUsageError` (similar to
our other scenarios, such as search params bailout, headers/cookies, or
fetch + revalidate/no-store)
Closes NEXT-1712
Requires vercel/turbo#6388
This uses the structure implemented in vercel/turbo#6388 to support formatted text when reporting. Right now only the `Line` and basic `String` cases are handled.
## Description
Between 14.0.2-canary.6 and 14.0.2-canary.7, a change was introduced in vercel/next.js#56497 that turned the Redux store state into a Promise, rather than a synchronous state update.
This caused the `sync` function -- used to send state updates to the Redux Devtools -- to be recreated on every dispatch, which in turn, by referential instability, caused the `HistoryUpdater` component to re-render and trigger a `history.replaceState` with no particular change, but with the internal `canonicalUrl`.
When an app does a soft/shallow navigation by calling history methods directly (currently the only way to do shallow search params updates in the app router), these changes would have been overwritten by any prefetch (eg: hovering or mounting a Link), which is usually a no-op for the navigation state.
This PR changes the `sync` function to take the state as an argument rather than as a closure. The whole app router state is also unwrapped only once, and fed to the HistoryUpdater. Changes to its contents made by reducers will cause the HistoryUpdater effect to re-run, triggering history updates and a call to the sync function.
## Context
I maintain [`next-usequerystate`](https://github.com/47ng/next-usequerystate), which is used in the Vercel dashboard, and which is impacted by this change (see
[#388](https://github.com/47ng/next-usequerystate/issues/388)).
## History
@timneutkens introduced the `sync` function and the whole Redux devtools reducer in vercel/next.js#39866, with the note:
> a new hook useReducerWithReduxDevtools has been added, we'll probably want to put this behind a compile-time flag when the new router is marked stable but until then it's useful to have it enabled by default (only
when you have Redux Devtools installed ofcourse).
If a different direction is needed to keep sending `RENDER_SYNC` actions to Redux devtools, I'll be happy to rework this PR to move the `sync` function into the action queue.
## Changes
- [x] Added e2e test. Requires a `start` mode as prefetch links are disabled in development. Test was verified to fail from next@>=12.0.2-canary.7 without the fix.
Co-authored-by: Zack Tanner <1939140+ztanner@users.noreply.github.com>
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
-->
This PR fixes a bug where the expected catch-all route would not match
if there were multiple "catch-all routes" under the "parallel route”.
The page on the non-parallel routes path matches the catch all routes.
that exist on the more detailed path.
However, under parallel routes, it matches the most parent page of all
the pages with catch all routes.
For example, if there are files like below:
```
app/@sidebar/[...catchall]/page.tsx
app/@sidebar/dashboard/[...catchall]/page.tsx
```
When accessing `/foo`, it should match
`app/@sidebar/[...catchall]/page.tsx`, and this is working correctly.
However, when accessing `/dashboard/foo`, it should match
`app/@sidebar/dashboard/[...catchall]/page.tsx`, but
`app/@sidebar/[...catchall]/page.tsx` is being matched instead.
## Repository to reproduce
https://github.com/nonoakij/fix-parallel-routes-with-catch-all
## Related PR
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/58215
---------
Co-authored-by: Jimmy Lai <laijimmy0@gmail.com>
## What?
This PR introduces support for manually calling `history.pushState` and `history.replaceState`.
It's currently under an experimental flag:
```js
/**
* @type {import('next').NextConfig}
*/
const nextConfig = {
experimental: {
windowHistorySupport: true,
},
}
module.exports = nextConfig
```
Going forward I'll refer to `history.pushState` as `replaceState` is interchangable.
When the flag is enabled you're able to call the web platform `history.pushState` in the usual way:
```js
const data = {
foo: 'bar'
}
const url = '/my-new-url?search=tim'
window.history.pushState(data, '', url)
```
Let's start by explaining what would happen without the flag:
When a new history entry is pushed outside of the Next.js router any back navigation to that history entry will cause a browser reload as it can no longer be used by Next.js as the required metadata for the router is missing. In practice this makes it so that pushState/replaceState is not feasible to be used. Any pathname / searchParams added can't be observed by `usePathname` / `useSearchParams` either.
With the flag enabled the pushState/replaceState calls are instrumented and is synced into the Next.js router. This way the Next.js router's internal metadata is preserved, making back navigations apply still, and pathname / searchParams is synced as well, making sure that you can observe it using `usePathname` and `useSearchParams`.
## How?
- Added a new experimental flag `windowHistorySupport`
- Instruments `history.pushState` and `history.replaceState`
- Triggers the same action as popstate (ACTION_RESTORE) to sync the provided url (if provided) into the Next.js router
- Copies the Next.js values kept in history.state so that they are not lost
- Calls the original pushState/replaceState
~~Something to figure out is how we handle additional pushes/replaces in Next.js as that should override the history state that was previously set.~~
Went with this after discussing with @sebmarkbage:
- When you open a page it preserves the custom history state
- This is to solve this case: when you manually `window.history.pushState` / `window.history.replaceState` and then do an mpa navigation (i.e. `<a>` or `window.location.href`) and the navigate backwards the custom history state is preserved
- When you navigate back and forward (popstate) it preserves the custom history state
- When you navigate client-side (i.e. `router.push()` / `<Link>`) the custom history state is not preserved
This PR fixes a bug where parallel routes would not apply appropriately on navigation when used within slots.
The following scenarios:
```
/foo
/bar
/@slot
/[...catchAll]
```
or
```
/foo
/[...catchAll]
/@slot
/bar
```
will now function correctly when accessing /foo/bar, and Next.js will render both /bar and the catchall slots.
The issue was that the tree constructed by `next-app-loader` for a given path, /foo/bar in the example, would not include the paths for the catch-all files at build time. The routing was done 1-1 when compiling files, where a path would only match one file, with parallel routes, a path could hit a defined path but also a catch all route at the same time in a different slot.
The fix consists of adding another normalisation layer that will look for all catch-all in `appPaths` and iterate over the other paths and add the relevant information when needed.
The tricky part was making sure that we only included the relevant paths to the loader: we don't want to overwrite a slot with a catch all if there's already a more specific subpath in that slot, i.e. if there's /foo/@slot/bar/page.js, no need to inject /foo/@slot/bar/[...catchAll].
One thing that is not supported right now is optional catch all routes, will add later.
fixes#48719fixes#49662
Instead of requiring React in `maybePostpone` (which is susceptible to referencing the wrong version of React during build time, such as in the case where the static worker patches fetch within an app-route, which doesn't have an experimental runtime), this provides the postpone API to the `staticGenerationStore`. That way we know the API is available in render which is when we'd expect to postpone.
The "postpone" terminology is internal to React and can be used for more
things than just this. It's also a mechanism we may or may not rely on.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zack Tanner <zacktanner@gmail.com>
This PR fixes the bug in which interception routes of the form `(.)[param]` would not intercept navigations.
The bug happened because we would not create a dynamic route matcher for the intercepted route, so we would never match the correct dynamic route when hitting the server, falling back to the base one.
The fix consists of fixing the logic that checks for a dynamic route so that it checks the correct path when handling an interception route.
There's probably a better fix here, advice welcome
fixes#52533
Fixes two build output logs:
- A page that uses `generateStaticParams` & postpones should be marked as partially prerendered
- Assume pages that contain dynamic segments will postpone when PPR is enabled even though it won't be determined until request time
When `patchFetch` is applied at during `buildAppStaticPaths` ([ref](030021234b/packages/next/src/build/utils.ts (L1253-L1256))), it's done so without any context of the bundled React runtime.
Since `patchFetch` will potentially postpone during static generation with PPR, it needs to be using the correct React version, otherwise `unstable_postpone` won't be available e.g. in the case of a page utilizing `generateStaticParams`.
This moves `patchFetch` into the bundled runtime so that it has the correct version of React when invoked.
We had added encoding the client component assets loaded from RSC manifest that we need to encode them to make sure when they're loaded on server and sent to client, the client will receive the encoded one. But the override of the webpack chunk loading method could be loaded later than react related chunks, that when client component is loaded first (e.g. `next/script`) and it triggers react loaded ealier than the overriding. Then the chunk could be encoded incorrectly.
Discussed with @gnoff and put this out as the 1st step solution to ensure the order. in the future we can try to get rid of the encoding by providing safer url
Fixes#57829
A shared incremental cache IPC server was introduced for build-time static workers as an optimization to dedupe fetch requests, however this can cause fetch-related flakiness to builds under certain conditions (e.g., large payloads).
This moves the optimization behind an experimental flag to unblock those running into IPC-related build time errors while we work on an alternative solution for the underlying issue
Fixes#53695
This removes our current convention of throwing promises in reducers in
favor of returning promises that can be consumed by `use` instead. This
will help unblock some future improvements (batching, PPR)
Reducers that would typically throw a promise now return their promise.
This gets maintained by a mutable queue (initialized in hydrate) to
ensure actions are processed in-order. The queue is also responsible for
mutating state and passing it as an input to subsequent actions.
This PR does not modify reducer behavior to keep changes minimal, but
there's more cleanup that we can do in a follow-up PR to remove things
that previously assumed reducers would be replayed.
(I recommend reviewing with whitespace turned off)
---------
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
When postpone is caught by user code, this will cause PPR not to properly prerender the static parts and thus we need to fail the build. This also adds some messaging about how to fix the error.
Prior to this change, catching code that would normally trigger `postpone ` would silently fail, but the build outputs would be incorrect as there's no postpone data available.
Relands #57477 with additional tests & fixes
Reduce the confusiong of the the logging of pages, make it easier to understand
* Removing the trailing `/page`, `/route` suffix
* Removing the internal segment like `[[...__metadata__]]`
#### After
```
○ Compiling / ...
○ Compiling /dynamic/[slug]/icon ...
```
#### Before
```
○ Compiling /page ...
○ Compiling /(group)/dynamic/[slug]/icon-ahg52g/[[...__metadata_id__]]/route ...
```
Closes NEXT-1701
This new option specifies a list of host names that are considered safe, to accept as Server Action requests if they're different from the initial request origin. It can be very helpful when the hosted app has many layers of reverse proxies ahead.
Closes#57397.
### What?
Follow-up of #56797
While working on this, I noticed that some logic around stripping internal headers was duplicated, so I did some cleanup too.
### Why?
In #56797 we set these headers, but it only affected Route Handlers, Middleware is still missing them, which is a regression introduced in #52492
(Related: https://github.com/vercel/next-learn/issues/252)
### How?
Move to set these headers up to `base-server.ts` so they are present in Middleware too.
> Note: All headers are set with `??=` to respect the original value if set (with other words, only add these headers if they aren't set yet)
Closes NEXT-
Fixes#52266
For app router bundling layers "SSR rendering" and "browser" layer, which are used for server side rendering and client, we should still apply the module resolving rules to all assets since we bundled everything, removed the default exclude conditions as they'll not apply the rules to node_modules. That could cause the mismatch resolving for package.
E.g. You have two dual packages A and B are both compatible for ESM and CJS, and both have default export. B is depent on A, but when you import B in a client component that will be SSR'd, it's picking up the CJS asset like the case described in #57584 .
Fixes#57584
Closes NEXT-1702
### What?
Wraps up metadata-dynamic-routes tests fixes for the turbopack. There is 1 remaining failing test due to lacks of supporting `import.meta.url` which need to be addressed separately.
I spent amount of time why turbopack cannot find the route for the dynamic metadata for a certain route. In the end, found there are mismatching expectations for the route due to different hash for the certain route. We do use the same djb2 hash between next.js and turbopack both, so it was quite confusing why we don't get deterministic hash.
After trying some experiments, found out root cause was how 2 different runtimes handle overflow for given type of numbers. In rust + turbpack we use u32 and do 32-bit hash calculation for given string, while in js we implicitly used number type as is, in result overflow occurs with default 53-bit float.
Originally I tried to adjust hash in turbopack side to preserve js hash as-is, but so far I found it was non trivial to do so as rust there's no out of the box types we can coerce to the js number type. In result, unlike other fixes in turbopack this PR changes how js hash is being generated. I hope this woulndn't be a breaking changes; expect so since this is a metadata specific hash that we do not have written spec for it.
Closes WEB-1890
This removes the ignores for dev react bundles which was added as an
optimization but causes issues when react is imported from an ESM module
since all requires are being analyzed for named exports.
Fixes#57582
Displaying hints of "missing default export" if you didn't properly export the `default` handler for og image
```
▲ Next.js 14.0.1-canary.2
- Local: http://localhost:3000
✓ Ready in 1089ms
✓ Compiled /opengraph-image/[[...__metadata_id__]]/route in 211ms (44 modules)
⨯ Error: Default export is missing in "/Users/huozhi/workspace/next.js/test/e2e/app-dir/metadata-dynam
ic-routes/app/opengraph-image.tsx"
at eval (webpack:///app/opengraph-image.tsx?3407:11:1)
at (app-metadata-route)/../../../../packages/next/dist/build/webpack/loaders/next-metadata-route-lo
ader.js?page=%2Fopengraph-image%2F%5B%5B...__metadata_id__%5D%5D%2Froute&isDynamic=1!./app/opengraph-im
age.tsx?__next_metadata_route__ (/Users/huozhi/workspace/next.js/test/e2e/app-dir/metadata-dynamic-rout
es/.next/server/app/opengraph-image/[[...__metadata_id__]]/route.js:362:1)
at __webpack_require__ (/Users/huozhi/workspace/next.js/test/e2e/app-dir/metadata-dynamic-routes/.n
ext/server/webpack-runtime.js:33:42)
```
Scope all `serverActions` config in one group "serverActions" to make it
more semantics
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Rather than sending a warning, we should fail the build if a postpone
call is caught. We should also fail the build if there are any errors
during static generation similar to the non-ppr case.
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
### What?
Adds support for Server Actions imported by both server and client.
### Why?
If an Action is imported by both the Client and RSC layers, we need to
support them as if they're the same action.
### How?
First, we need to ensure both layers create the same action hash ids,
which we can then use to deduplicate actions imported by both layers. If
a conflict is found, we prefer the RSC layer's action.
Closes WEB-1879
---------
Co-authored-by: Tobias Koppers <tobias.koppers@googlemail.com>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
when calls to `maybePostpone` throw but there's no postpone state, we want to handle those errors differently so that we can provide clearer messaging around how to prevent them, while still retaining any errors that were re-thrown by the user.
ex:
Apply react-server condition and related API checks for pages API.
if you're doing react SSR with renderToString in middleware it should be disallowed. Imaging it could send the rendered html code to client and you display it in browser. But it might require hydration so it can be broken.
Follow up for #57448 , same reason explained in #57448
Closes NEXT-1653
Apply `react-server` resolving and server components invalid APIs
checking to middleware. We want to limit the react usage in in
middleware as so far it's not aimed for rendering purpose.
Another invalid case could be: if you're doing react SSR with
`renderToString` in middleware it should be disallowed. Imaging it could
send the rendered html code to client and you display it in browser. But
it might require hydration so it can be broken.
This PR will only let you import `react-server` export condition
packages.
## Story Time
Metadata API introduced two exports `metadata` and `generateMetadata` to the pages and layouts under app router, as partial prerendering work is going on and people are desiring to render the metadata asynchronizly, this change will be the preparation for moving to the dynamic & asynchronized land. In short, if we can render the metadata asynchronizedly, it will benefit the performance of the initial page loading and client page transiation a lot. Any slow data fetching can be handled while the essential page "shell" is rendered.
For meta tags, there're few ones will visually affect your web page, such as `<meta name="viewport">`, `<meta name="theme color">` and `<meta name="color-scheme">`, rendering them lately after the page frame is ready might bring flickering to the page such as revreting whole page's theme color or shaking due to viewport updates. Those meta are not majorly the "metadata" for SEO, but more for user experience when opening the page. If we're rendering everything as async meta tags, it won't be ideal due to the flickering on your web pages.
## Solution Preparation
We'll want to render the meta tags separately to make sure the visual ones are rendered as blocking along with web page, and then the ones for SEO or bots can be flushed later by later, like a suspense boundary keeps emitting them into the head of html.
We optionally picked up 3 meta tag "viewport", "theme-color" and "color-scheme" to be render first into the web page with html "shell", to guarantee the layout viewport and basic styling are rendered first.
This PR introduced two module export in the page and layout files: `viewport` and `generateViewport`, in order to separate the visual meta tags from the SEO metadata.
### API
```ts
// page.js | layout.js
export const viewport = {
// viewport meta tag
width: 'device-width',
initialScale: 1,
maximumScale: 1,
interactiveWidget: 'resizes-visual',
// visual meta tags
colorScheme: 'dark',
themeColor: { color: 'cyan', media: '(prefers-color-scheme: dark)' },
}
```
There's also a dynamic API like what we did for metadata API
```ts
// page.js | layout.js
export function generateViewport() {
return { ... }
}
```
## Notice
This PR won't get SEO metadata rendered asyncronizedly, instead it's a preparation for the later work in partial prerendering and async metadata. We'll encourage the Next.js community moving to the new metadata viewport API if you're customzing those 3 meta tags. Usually you don't have to change viewport itself, so mostly like only theme-color and color-scheme could relate to it.
Instead of `Readable.toWeb` we're gonna manually convert the Node.js stream to a Web stream. `toWeb` is either having a bug, or not compatible with middleware-cloned `PassThrough` streams.
Closes#56286. The case should be already covered with existing tests.
This ensures when an error occurs during a revalidate in app router that
properly throw the error fully and don't store the error page in the
cache which matches the expected behavior for full route ISR as errors
are not meant to update the cache so that the last successful cache
entry can continue being served.
Fix was tested against the provided reproduction here
https://app-dir-example-ghl01cxtn-basement.vercel.app/
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/53195
This ensures we don't unexpectedly error when a fetch attempts to cache
inside of `unstable_cache`, this also ensures `only-on-store` doesn't
unexpectedly error when `revalidate: 0` is set.
This PR introduces a build optimization to create a "partial prerender" of the page.
1. During compilation, we create a static shell for the page using your existing Suspense boundaries. Components that can be static will be included in this static shell, leaving holes for the dynamic components.
1. Using `<Suspense />`, we can define fallbacks to be included in the partial prerender, as well as the holes for the dynamic components to stream into.
This means Next.js can initially serve a static loading skeleton, kicking off the dynamic parts in parallel. Then, the dynamic components stream in on demand. Dynamic components can use `cookies()`, `headers()`, `'cache': 'no-store'`, or `unstable_noStore()` to opt-into dynamic rendering.
Co-authored-by: Zack Tanner <1939140+ztanner@users.noreply.github.com>
We introduced a data fetching logging before, and the control option was under experimental. After a bit experiments turns out users really loves it. We decide to move it to a stable option.
### Changes
We're going to move the `logging` option outside of `experimental`, and scope the `fetches` related config under `logging.fetches`.
```js
// next.config.js
logging?: {
fetches?: {
fullUrl?: boolean
}
}
```
### What?
- fixes test 17553c5e25/test/e2e/app-dir/metadata/metadata.test.ts (L487)
The way next.js collects static metadata is read static metadata, and then read layout metadata to merge multiple metadatas into a single layout path (17553c5e25/packages/next/src/lib/metadata/resolve-metadata.ts (L347-L352))
When turbopack creates LoaderTree for the corresponding directory tree, it extracts `page` but skips metadata in result there are orphan components that have a metadata doesn't have layout metadata, as well as a component have a layout doesn't have metadata. Latter is being rendered as a page (since it have correct layout), which eventually falls back to the default metadata instead.
PR trickles down the metadata when extracting page (creating a new component with `page`) to consolidates those.
Also PR expands Metadata to have base_page property to capture where it has been originally exists, as we clone down metadata then do `fillMetadataSegment` against the current page where LoaderTree is being created it creates a wrong relative path. For example, currently
```
/icon.svg
- opengragph/
- static -> path being `/opengraph/.../icon.svg` instead of `/icon.svg`
```
When recursively traverse directory tree, capture each components with corresponding base_page to calculate instead.
Unfortunately this doesn't make pass all of the metadata tests; there are lot to dig more. Would like to scope PR in a reasonable size.
Closes WEB-1795
This PR implements encryption and decryption for Server Action bound values that are from the closure level. Explicit `.bind` values, function arguments and module-level values are NOT handled.
### Compiler
The compiler now groups all closure bound values to an array which gets wrapped with `encrypt`. And then inside the action body, it prepends an expression to recreate the values via `await decrypt`.
Since closure-closed variables will only exist on the server layer, the encryption utility has `"server-only"` annotated.
### Encryption
During build time, a private AES-GCM encryption key is randomly generated and stored in the built server manifest. Before encrypting/decrypting, an extra round of Flight server and client will be used to serialize/deserialize the value.
When encrypting, a salt that contains the action ID is provided to prevent replay attack towards different API endpoints. The encryption key can be overridden via the `NEXT_SERVER_ACTIONS_ENCRYPTION_KEY` env variable so it can be built on multiple machines on scale.
A global singleton for storing the client reference manifest was made for Flight's serialization/deserialization as that might happen outside of rendering.
After encryption, we then serialize the ArrayBuffer as Base64 to send it to the client.
Remove the experimental `serverActions` flag
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <3676859+shuding@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
Exposes the new experimental Taint APIs using the `taint` flag which
enables experimental React.
As an example for how we can use it, I use it to taint `process.env`
with a better error message. I'm not sure where this should live since
it's a global init but it needs access to the global config. It's
unnecessary to retaint it for every render but not sure if there's a
better place for it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jimmy Lai <laijimmy0@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR adds a resolver plugin to verify during bundling that when a module is unresolved, that it is not an optional peer dependency specified in the package.json of the caller. An error would happen if you try to bundle packages like `typeorm` since there are `require` calls in the code to those dependencies.
Also, swallow dynamic dependencies warnings in `require` calls error if they come from `node_modules`. They are not actionable at all generally.
We already had `domains` as "not recommended" but this PR marks it as "deprecated" and prints a warning if its detected.
I also updated all examples to switch from `domains` to `remotePatterns`.
### Story
Since we introduced `ImageResponse` into `next/server` export, there're a few libraries relying on `next/server` that accidentally ended up with bundling og image into the bundle. As og package is quite large that could easily raise the size concern for middleware, edge runtime routes.
### Struggles
We've done optimizations. The tree-shaking strategies are tricky, we tried modularize imports and also optimize cjs require/exports to make sure you're not including og package into bundle if it's not being used. However, it's still not 100% can handle all the bundle optimization cases, such as `import {..} from "next/server.js"` could also ended up with the cjs bundle that failed the tree-shaking.
### Move on
So we decide to move og `ImageResponse` into a separate export `next/og`
Closes NEXT-1660
This PR adds the optional `limit` parameter on String.prototype.split uses.
> If provided, splits the string at each occurrence of the specified separator, but stops when limit entries have been placed in the array. Any leftover text is not included in the array at all.
[MDN](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/split#syntax)
While the performance gain may not be significant for small texts, it can be huge for large ones.
I made a benchmark on the following repository : https://github.com/Yovach/benchmark-nodejs
On my machine, I get the following results:
`node index.js`
> normal 1: 570.092ms
> normal 50: 2.284s
> normal 100: 3.543s
`node index-optimized.js`
> optmized 1: 644.301ms
> optmized 50: 929.39ms
> optmized 100: 1.020s
The "benchmarks" numbers are :
- "lorem-1" file contains 1 paragraph of "lorem ipsum"
- "lorem-50" file contains 50 paragraphes of "lorem ipsum"
- "lorem-100" file contains 100 paragraphes of "lorem ipsum"
This updates some code related to web streams and encoding.
- Removes some unused code related to base64 encoding/decoding (Edge runtime currently supports it natively via `Buffer`)
- Prefer readable stream `pull` versus `.on("data", (chunk) => { ... })` event handlers (simplifies execution)
- Utilize `pipeTo` and `pipeThrough` on web streams to remove custom code related to stream pumping
- Updates pipe readable function to utilize web streams first class rather than relying on manual pumping + stream management
- This also takes advantage of the `AbortController` when piping so that the response can use it to cancel the stream
This PR introduces a new API, `unstable_noStore`, which will allow users to declaratively opt out of caching anywhere during static generation in the same way that you can specify `cache: 'no-store'` on a fetch call in Next.js.
An important caveat and difference from just calling `cookies()` to opt-out of static generation is that this won't opt you out when called from within `unstable_cache` and instead defers to the cache configuration to it.
```
import {unstable_noStore as noStore} from 'next/cache';
export default async function Component() {
noStore();
const result = await db.query(...);
}
```
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
This PR therefore introduces to always set response status code to 500
unless it is a `NotFoundError` or `RedirectError`. This PR would fix
issue #56235. See also:
https://codesandbox.io/p/sandbox/nice-panini-2z3mcp .
**Current Behavior**
At the moment, when an unexpected error occurs during app server
rendering, a 200 ok is returned as status code. This seems to be
undesirable because of the success status CDNs will cache the error
pages and crawlers will index the page considering the error content as
the actual content.
**Desired Behavior**
This issue is related to discussion
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/53225. Even though I
understand that the response status code cannot be set if streaming has
started, in my view it would be best to set the response status to 500
whenever it can (so before the streaming has started) for SEO and (CDN)
http caching. This would also be consistent with how 404s currently
work; that is, response status code is set to 404 if `NotFoundError`
occurred before streaming (related
[issue](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/43831) &
[PR](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/55542)).
Ideally, when a runtime error happens after streaming, a `<meta
name="robots" content="noindex" />` would also be added. But I didn't
want to make the PR too complex before receiving feedback.
---------
Co-authored-by: Vũ Văn Dũng <me@joulev.dev>
Co-authored-by: Tobias Koppers <tobias.koppers@googlemail.com>
### What?
BREAKING CHANGE: Bump the minimum required Node.js version.
### Why?
Node.js 16 has reached end-of-life in September.
Bumped to `18.18.2` since it contained some security-related patches: https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/october-2023-security-releases
### How?
Bumped `engines` where needed, upgraded the workflows.
This will allow us to remove quite a few polyfills, I'll open separate PRs for those.
Since Turbopack doesn't use eval-source-map the CSP nonce will pass correctly, nice improvement over the current state where you can't check CSP in dev.
Fixes a bunch of the Turbopack test failures for `test/e2e/app-dir/app/index.test.ts`. Not sure how this passed with webpack before as the dep was indeed missing.
### What?
Adding back `x-forwarded-*` headers.
### Why?
Starting with #52492, these headers were lost.
### How?
We can populate these headers before executing a request.
Closes NEXT-1663
Fixes#55942
`useParams` is not referentially equal between renders which can lead to unexpected behavior when used as a dep.
This memoizes the response from `useParams` similar to `useSearchParams`.
[slack x-ref](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C04DUD7EB1B/p1697145987740229)
This change is to pick the esm assets for RSC server layer and server rendering side, this is for production and development perf purpose, also to let them apply with the ESM related optimization such as tree-shaking, barrel files optimizations, etc.
We found a few packages that can't be optimized easily in bundling because we're using "main" field so the packages are not able to be tree-shaked, ending up with large bundle in the dist. This will change a lot for the bundling improvements as some packages are only having "main" and "module" field. So switching from CJS to ESM means better bundling, more optimization, and faster code.
#56501 was a precondition for this, as previously the bundling strategy was applied to some library but triggered the invalid hooks erroring.
### Other Monior Change
Previously we'll prefer to resolve CJS as there're 2 versions of react, using CJS assets will help let them pass by require-hook to use canary react for app router bundling assets. But now we changed the approach to bundling nextjs runtime and react packages. Now we dropped the condition that prefered to resolve CJS exports for externals, since if you're putting them in `serverComponentsExternalPackages`, they're not using the built-in react, so could potentially having trouble if any dependency is using react but excluded in bundles. So far we didn't see any report to this.
Closes NEXT-1286
This applies the predefined list of packages in server-external-packages.json as always external when used by app router in Turbopack
Test Plan: Added integration tests
Closes WEB-1709
