fixes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/34199
Also fixes response code to return `500` when showing error page of preflight request failure on dev mode
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
x-ref: #34021 , #34004
Only log each warning once and only trigger in concurrent mode
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
`escape-regex.ts` will always be included in the bundle, so not re-using it actually makes the size larger.
Implements https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/30997 with some minor tweaks to the design:
* The hook is moved to Client Components (e.g. `pages/_app` instead of `pages/_document`). This was a silly oversight in the original design: the hook needs to be called during server prerendering.
* `useFlushEffects` instead of `useFlushEffect` as there isn't a particularly safe way to implement the singular semantics as a Client Component hook given the current implementation of server rendering.
---
Fixes#30997
The shared utils file included an import from `react` (because it was using `createContext`) which seems to be unnecessary in the Middleware bundle.
With this PR and steps #34425 laid out, the bundle size did decrease without breaking functionality.
Fixes#34425
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Fixes: #34342
Visiting the following page will call gSSP indefinitely in a loop and logs errors from `on-demand-entries-client`:
```js
const Home = () => null
export default Home
export function getServerSideProps() {
console.log("gssp called")
return { notFound: true }
}
```
We should not keep fetching the page if it returns 404 as it can introduce unnecessary data requests.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR removes the experimental `optimizeImages` flag. This feature was designed to automatically add preload tags for images, but I was never able to get it to do a very good job of selecting the images that actually need preloading.
This feature never graduated from experimental and in fact we never even publicized it as an experimental feature for people to try.
Additionally, even if someone was using this feature, it wouldn't have a functional effect, only a performance effect (removal of some preloads).
For those reasons, I believe it is safe to remove this functionality and that it is not a breaking change.
Fixes#33476
I've added the test for this but it passes either way, even when the change to loadable.js is not made. On the reproduction I was able to reproduce it consistently and it's fixed with this change.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Make the external `Router` state immutable, and make it so there's only one place (`set`) where it is changed and announced. This is to prepare for #33919, which ensures that we only create a new router once per tree.
* Allow scroll prevention on hash change
Currently, `scrollToHash` is performed on every hash change, even when this change is caused by `<Link scroll={false} {...props} />`.
This change prevents scrolling in this case and allows users to specify the desired scrolling behavior in the router's `hashChangeComplete` event.
* Add test case and apply fixes
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
In #33968, a warning was added for script tags inserted through the
next/head component. This change unintentionally included
application/ld+json scripts, which shouldn't be triggering the
warnings (as they were originally intended to catch scripts where
loading order or timing could be important). This change adds an
exception for application/ld+json scripts, so they do not log the
warning if they are included through next/head.
This commit adds a development mode warning in the console
if you try to include <link rel="stylesheet"> tags in
next/head, e.g.
```
<Head>
<link ref="stylesheet" href="..." />
</Head>
```
The warning message explains that this pattern will not
work well with Suspense/streaming and recommends using a
custom Document component instead.
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit adds a development mode warning in the console
if you try to include <script> tags in next/head, e.g.
```
<Head>
<script async src="..." />
</Head>
```
The warning message explains that this pattern will not
work well with Suspense/streaming and recommends using the
next/script component instead.
TODO in follow-up PR: add same warning for stylesheets, etc
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
This ensures we properly handle external `beforeFiles` rewrites client-side so that a different result doesn't occur client-side versus on a direct visit.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/32348
## Feature
Reuse most of the part from manifest plugin to generate similar assets
Resolves#33667
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #33314` #33314
- [ ] Moved the `is-plain-object` file to the shared directory since it's emitted to the client and thus needs to be transpiled.
This is just my 2nd PR so if I'm missing something please let me know.
Part of #31506, this PR moves the code of middleware handling from the base server to the node server.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Adds base http classes, along with Node + Web (partial) implementations
Removes usage of IncomingMessage and ServerResponse from base server
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <3676859+shuding@users.noreply.github.com>
and text is easier to gzip
and it avoid the reference to `Buffer` from next
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
This PR moves `require` and `fs` usage from the base server to the node server. Closes#32322.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
* JSON.stringify generic errors
* Add util for normalizing errors
* lint-fix
* Add better error for null case as well
Co-authored-by: Michael Ozeryansky <mozeryansky@users.noreply.github.com>
it should not leak into the client runtime
cc @javivelasco
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
This PR adds a new command to the `next` CLI.
Running `next info` will print useful information to the terminal about how/where Next.js is run. This information can be added to the Bug report when opening an issue in the repository.
This makes reporting issues more accurate and doesn't require the user to guess certain details, the command will retrieve it on their behalf.
Example output:
```sh
$ npx --no-install next info
Operating System:
Platform: linux
Version: #22-Ubuntu SMP Fri Nov 5 13:21:36 UTC 2021
Binaries:
Node: 16.13.0
npm: 8.1.0
Yarn: 1.22.17
pnpm: 6.24.2
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.8-canary.14
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
```
The idea is based on #32858
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Co-authored-by: Steven <229881+styfle@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes#32727
With this PR we introduce a new header that can be used to respond from Middleware `x-middleware-cache`. When the value of this header is set to `no-cache`, the client will **not** store the effects read from a preflight response to be used in an upcoming check.
Instead of using `Cache-Control` we are using a custom header to not mess with browser specific caching. Accepting a specific value to opt out (`no-cache`) opens the future opportunity of having other caching strategies.
This feature solves the issue of having a preflight request whose parameters can change from the client affecting the effects. For example, having a cookie that would make a middleware rewrite to one pathname or another and allowing to change that cookie from the client. In that case we'd always need to revalidate the effects on navigation synchronously.
Of course when using this feature it is possible that we add some latency on navigation so the preferred mechanism will be caching by default since it covers the most common use cases.
When the URL already contains a hash (like `/#section`) and a `Link` with `href="/"` is clicked, the page should scroll to the top on the first click. Currently, it only happens with the second click (after `#section` has been removed from the URL).
Fixes#32931
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Fixes#32302
This PR fixes an issue on hydration where we rewrote using a middleware to a dynamic path. In such cases we need to run preflight to find out the middleware operation metadata.
## Bug
- [X] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [X] Integration tests added
- [X] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes incorrect generated manifest and generated directory for `index/[...dynamic]` pages
Too much normalizing adding extra `index/` prefix to `index/[...dynamic]` routes which lead to the incorrected generated routes like `.next/server/pages/index/index/index/[...dynamic]`
## Bug
Fixes https://github.com/vercel/customer-issues/issues/146
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
**Note**: This PR is applying again changes landed #31935 that were reverted from an investigation.
This PR fixes#30398
By default Next will polyfill some fetch APIs (Request, Response, Header and fetch) only if fetch is not found in the global scope in certain entry points. If we have a custom server which is adding a global fetch (and only fetch) at the very top then the rest of APIs will not be polyfilled.
This PR adds a test on the custom server where we can add a custom polyfill for fetch with an env variable. This reproduces the issue since next-server.js will be required without having a polyfill for Response which makes it fail on requiring NextResponse. Then we remove the code that checks for subrequests to happen within the **sandbox** so that we don't need to polyfill `next-server` anymore.
The we also introduce an improvement on how we handle relative requests. Since #31858 introduced a `port` and `hostname` options for the server, we can always pass absolute URLs to the Middleware so we can always use the original `nextUrl` to pass it to fetch. This brings a lot of simplification for `NextURL` since we don't have to consider relative URLs no more.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Reverts support for render prop in `<Main />` in `Document`. This was added just to support the `useFlushEffect` hook, but we've tweaked the design a bit, moving it to `App`.
This PR fixes#30398
By default Next will polyfill some fetch APIs (Request, Response, Header and fetch) only if fetch is not found in the global scope in certain entry points. If we have a custom server which is adding a global fetch (and only fetch) at the very top then the rest of APIs will not be polyfilled.
This PR adds a test on the custom server where we can add a custom polyfill for fetch with an env variable. This reproduces the issue since next-server.js will be required without having a polyfill for Response which makes it fail on requiring NextResponse. Then we remove the code that checks for subrequests to happen within the **sandbox** so that we don't need to polyfill `next-server` anymore.
The we also introduce an improvement on how we handle relative requests. Since #31858 introduced a `port` and `hostname` options for the server, we can always pass absolute URLs to the Middleware so we can always use the original `nextUrl` to pass it to fetch. This brings a lot of simplification for `NextURL` since we don't have to consider relative URLs no more.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Since #31939 is going to move the `Document` components, we can't rely on `DefinePlugin` to provide environment variables. This PR passes them as render opts instead. We can't just force this to be bundled like e.g. `next/dynamic`, because we use it internally.
Whenever we trigger a route change in the client we check if there route we are navigating to is affected by a middleware. When this is the case we run a preflight and in case there is an effect that tells us that the middleware is responding with content we force a _refresh_. This is fine for navigation in general but it is not ok when the change is triggered for hydration. For example, in cases where the rendered page is a dynamic page this triggers an infinite reload.
In this PR we add a test where we add a `_middleware` that proxies to a dynamic path. When making a request to `/interface/root-subrequest` there will be a middleware that simply performs a fetch against localhost for the same `/interface/root-subrequest`. The new request will skip the middleware to avoid loops and then render the dynamic page. Then client will force a change for hydration resulting in a preflight request that tells that the client must refresh because for that path there is a middleware writing content.
Then we add a fix which simply consist of checking the internal option that tells when a change is triggered for hydration and skip the preflight in such scenario.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
