There's a missing type in with-styled-coponents example's _document.tsx file
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Serverless target is deprecated, so we don't support it in Middleware as it's a new feature,
but we need to have a good error message for that. This commit solves that.
## Related
* Fixes#37433
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
This ensures we properly detect `pnpm` when installing missing dependencies. This also adds test coverage to ensure we properly detect the correct package manager.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
x-ref: [slack thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03KAR5DCKC/p1655568091661719)
If you end up in a state where an error happened and you also should be warned about a full refresh - you get stuck. The full refresh is blocked by the warning but the error is shown instead.
Tests didn't catch this because the refresh warning never showed in `__NEXT_TEST_MODE`.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
A small change, but eslint wasn't happy until I added this.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Converted AMP example over to TypeScript to match the Contribution guidelines, updated all dependencies, and made some necessary changes to allow AMP apps to build in TypeScript.
I added an additional .d.ts file, and referenced it in the tsconfig.json include array, as per the [Next.js docs](https://nextjs.org/docs/basic-features/typescript#existing-projects). These additional types are required to allow lowercase AMP elements to be a property on JSX.IntrinsicElements.
Fixes:
> Property 'amp-img' does not exist on type 'JSX.IntrinsicElements'.ts
I also replaced all occurrences of styled JSX with [@ijjk's workaround](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/7584#issuecomment-503376412) to get styles in the head at build time for AMP-only pages, hybrid AMP pages, and normal pages (non-AMP).
I tried using the useAmp hook first with multiple `<style jsx>` like this [Next.js discussion](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/16755), however AMP expects a [single `<style amp-custom>` tag in the head](https://amp.dev/documentation/guides-and-tutorials/learn/spec/amphtml/#stylesheets).
Fixes:
> The parent tag of tag 'style amp-custom' is 'body', but it can only be 'head'
## Documentation / Examples
- [X] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [X] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
In order to make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
```js
// next.config.js
module.exports = {
experimental: {
legacyBrowsers: false,
sharedPool: true,
newNextLinkBehavior: false
}
}
```
With the current implementation, using the config above will warn the usage of experimental features. However, those are the preset values that are defined in `defaultConfig` which means actually no experimental feature has been enabled at all.
The PR changes to only check if experimental features are actually enabled (have different values than the ones defined in `defaultConfig`).
This PR switches to using an SVG filter for blurring placeholder images, rather than a CSS filter. It's based on the technique described in @cramforce's [blog post](https://www.industrialempathy.com/posts/image-optimizations/#blurry-placeholder).
One change I made to @cramforce's version was to increase the stdDeviation property of the SVG (which controls the gaussian blur strength) from .5 to 50. Smaller values than this tended to look bad, as our technique for generating the blurry placeholder image tends to produce images with sharp contrast between the pixels, which looks bad when blown up unless it's blurred by a substantial amount.
This PR currently only affects the experimental `layout="raw"` but I expect to eventually apply it to all images. CC: @styfle @kara
## Documentation / Examples
The markdown format for blog-starter example was broken, so fixed it.
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
It failed, without my changes.
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
### What's in there?
This is a followup of https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/37695.
For the dev server to clean stacktraces, we're decorating errors caught during code evaluation (`getServerSideProps` or middleware).
However, when these errors are asynchronously raised, we can't decorate them before processing them, leading to this fallback logic:
bf7bf8217f/packages/next/server/dev/next-dev-server.ts (L775-L779)
Thanks to latest improvement of the edge-runtime in 1.1.0-beta.4, we can now catch unhandled rejection and uncaught exception, and decorate them.
### How to test?
Please reuse the existing tests who already covered these cases:
`pnpm testheadless --testPathPattern middleware-dev-errors`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Title self-explanatory: the package.json inside of the with-chakra-ui example template has been updated to newer versions
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR fixes an issue where we have a middleware that rewrites every single request to the same origin while having `i18n` configured. It would be something like:
```typescript
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
export function middleware(req) {
return NextResponse.rewrite(req.nextUrl)
}
```
In this case we are going to be adding always the `locale` at the beginning of the destination since it is a rewrite. This causes static assets to not match and the whole application to break. I believe this is a potential footgun so in this PR we are addressing the issue by removing the locale from pathname for those cases where we check against the filesystem (e.g. public folder).
To achieve this change, this PR introduces some preparation changes and then a refactor of the logic in the server router. After this refactor we are going to be relying on properties that can be defined in the `Route` to decide wether or not we should remove the `basePath`, `locale`, etc instead of checking which _type_ of route it is that we are matching.
Overall this simplifies quite a lot the server router. The way we are testing the mentioned issue is by adding a default rewrite in the rewrite tests middleware.
In a previous PR (#19032), we added a hard error during `next export` if the default Image Optimization API is being used because it requires a server to optimized on demand. The error message offers several different solutions but it didn't consider that by the time someone runs `next export`, they are probably done writing their app.
So if `next export` is a hard requirement, the quickest path forward is to disable Image Optimization API. So this PR adds a new configuration option to `next.config.js`:
```js
module.exports = {
images: {
unoptimized: true
}
}
```
### Update
Upon further discussion, we might want to avoid doing this just for images and instead introduce a top-level config to indicate export is coming and then handle errors or warn for [unsupported features](https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/static-html-export#unsupported-features).
```
module.exports = {
nextExport: true
}
```
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This improves the warning thats printed when you have experimental features enable so its clear which ones are enabled (in parenthesis) and where they are enabled (in next.config.js or next.config.mjs)
## Before
```
warn - You have enabled experimental feature(s).
```
## After
```
warn - You have enabled experimental features (reactRoot, serverComponents, scrollRestoration) in next.config.js.
```
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
In Middlewares, dynamic code execution is not allowed. Currently, we warn if eval / new Function are invoked in dev but don't warn another dynamic code execution in WebAssembly.
This PR adds warnings for `WebAssembly.compile` and `WebAssembly.instantiate` with a buffer parameter (note that `WebAssembly.instantiate` with a **module** parameter is legit) invocations. Note that other methods that compile WASM dynamically such as `WebAssembly.compileStreaming` are not exposed to users so we don't need to cover them.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Seems this got out of sync pre-release so this re-syncs the compiled files
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/runs/6907047235?check_suite_focus=true
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Shallow route changes did not work for rewritten pages when Middleware
was used, and made hard refreshes, although it was possible with static rewrites.
This happened because the router has a manifest of the static rewrites,
allowing static rewrites to map the route before comparing with the
local cache.
Middleware rewrites are dynamic and happening on the server, so we
can't send a manifest easily. This means that we need to propagate
the rewrites from the data requests into the components cache in
the router to make sure we have cache hits and don't miss.
This commit does exactly that and adds a test to verify that it works.
This fixes#37072 and fixes#31680
_Note:_ there's one thing that is somewhat an issue though: if the first
page the user lands on is a rewritten page, and will try to make a
shallow navigation to the same page--we will make a `fetch` request.
This is because we don't have any client cache of the `rewrite` we just
had.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
TypeScript is being leveraged for new examples going forward, so I'm converting this example over. 😂
## Documentation / Examples
- [X] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [X] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
## Motivation/ Context
- When upgrading `next` from `11` to `12`, I followed [Upgrade guide from 11 => 12](https://nextjs.org/docs/upgrading#upgrading-from-11-to-12). I removed `.babelrc` to opt-in `SWC`. I thought that's all, but after removing `.babelrc`, Jest broke immediately. So I follow the guide https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/compiler#jest to configure Jest to work with SWC. I copied the content of `jest.config.js` to my project but it does not work. The reason:
```diff
-const createJestConfig = nextJest({ dir }) // `dir` IS NOT DEFINED
+const createJestConfig = nextJest({ dir: './' }) // Should change to this. Sync with https://nextjs.org/docs/testing#setting-up-jest-with-the-rust-compiler
```
- This PR is to help others to configure Jest with SWC by copying code from the documentation site without encountering the same issue as I did.
## Documentation
- [x] Update the docs so users can just copy and paste when configuring Jest with SWC (Sync with https://nextjs.org/docs/testing#setting-up-jest-with-the-rust-compiler)
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
## Future work
- Since [Upgrade guide from 11 => 12](https://nextjs.org/docs/upgrading#upgrading-from-11-to-12) did not mention anything about Jest. If I remove `.babelrc` to opt-in SWC. The current Jest settings will crash (since it's using babel). We likely want to update the Upgrade guide to mention this cc: @leerob
* Improve stack traces in dev mode
* Refactor `react-dev-overlay` to support the Edge Compiler
* Serialize errors including the compiler `source`
* Adopt the new `react-dev-overlay` displaying it for middleware errors
* Improve tests
* fix rsc cases
* update test
* use check for dev test
* handle different error from node version
Co-authored-by: feugy <damien@vercel.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Fixes#37683
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
`with-docker-compose` contains everything needed to get Next.js up and running with Docker Compose.
This example aims to provide an easy-to-use, Next.js app development and production environment, **all without Node.js being installed** on the host machine. This ensures a consistent development environment across Windows, MacOS, and Linux teams.
I was inspired to create this, because the existing [with-docker](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/tree/canary/examples/with-docker) example only uses Docker to build the final production artifacts, not provide a development environment. Docker Compose easily syncs changes with containers for Hot Reloading, parallel builds, and networking, making it a powerful and consistent development tool.
Developers can **easily extend this example** by modifying the YAML files to include Nginx, Postgres, and other Docker images.
This example takes advantage of Docker multistage builds combined with the Next 12.1 [Output Standalone](https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/output-file-tracing#automatically-copying-traced-files-experimental) feature, to create up to **80% smaller apps** (Approximately 110 MB compared to 1 GB with create-next-app). I also included an example without multistage builds, for developers who don't want to get into the weeds.
I have been tweaking this Docker Compose setup over 3 years of real world use, but please let me know if anything can be improved.
The Contributing guidelines say TypeScript should be leveraged for new examples, so I thought I'd convert this example over.
I also:
- Upgraded all dependencies
- Replaced the `prop-types` package with TypeScript types
## Documentation / Examples
- [X] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [X] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
