Commit graph

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Keyan Zhang
8e202610a4
App Router: fix relative query/hash handling in next/link and router push/replace (#49521)
## Problem
Relative hash/query handling in `next/link` (e.g. `<Link
href="#hello">`) is broken in App Router, especially if you're on a
nested route.

This wasn't a problem in `/pages` because the href always get fully
resolved in `<NextLink>`; i.e. if you have `<Link href="#hash" />` on
`/hello`, it'll resolve the href to `/hello#hash` and use that
everywhere.

However, in App Router, `<Link>` no longer uses the current location to
resolve the href:
5451564f36/packages/next/src/client/link.tsx (L450-L457)

Therefore navigating with `new URL(href, location.origin)` will skip the
current path and always apply the relative hash/query to the _root_
route:
5451564f36/packages/next/src/client/components/app-router.tsx (L208-L215)

## Solution
Not 100% sure if this is the best solution, but since `app-router` is
already reading `window.location`, I'm using `location.href` as the base
URL to resolve the href.

I grep'd for `location.origin` and checked other callsites; seems like
only `app-router` deals with user specified hrefs.

Fixes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/42157 &
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/44139, and potentially
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/48554 and
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/22838

## Test Plan
```
pnpm testheadless test/e2e/app-dir/navigation
```

---------
2023-05-28 10:29:00 -07:00
Tim Neutkens
e6bca73d87
Add support for scrolling to hash fragment (#46995)
Adds support for scrolling based on the [hash
fragment](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URI_fragment) in client-side
navigations for the App Router, mirroring browser behavior.

- `#main-content` → scrolls to `id="main-content"` or
`name="main-content"` property
- `#top` → scrolls to the top of the page, this is a special case in
browsers.
- no hash → default scroll behavior, layout that changed

Fixes NEXT-658

<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:

## For Contributors

### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples

- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md

### Fixing a bug

- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md

### Adding a feature

- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md



## For Maintainers

- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change

### What?

### Why?

### How?

Closes NEXT-
Fixes #

-->

fixes #44295

---------

Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
2023-03-14 13:17:10 +01:00