## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This is second attempt to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/38076 . Most of changes are identical to previous PR. Main difference is introducing features `native-tls` and `rustls` for the sentry's downstream feature. Few platform targets we build (mostly where we cross compiles) fails to find native openssl for the specified target. For those, we falls back to rustls instead. The only exception is aarch64_windows, neither openssl nor rustls can be compiled straightforwardly, For those platform we bail out and do not init sentry at all. There are nearly 0 users on aarch64_windows anyway. We could try to located target's openssl binary, but the effort required seems not worth enough.
Also PR changed `server_name` property to not to include real device hostname to avoid possible PII concerns.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This PR attempts to setup native crash reporter for `next-swc`. Currently, it uses sentry internally, but it is subject to change depending on the usecase & needs. In any case it won't be breaking changes since this is not transparent to the end users.
PR sets up basic, minimal setup to collect crash reports only at the moment. We may want to expand & collect more data in native next-swc, but it is not clear what we need to collect / and I believe most cases next.js's js context can collect those data via existing telemetry. Crash report is an exception native handler can perform much better by having it in native context directly. While this is sent to different endpoint than telemetry, it is considered as same opt-in configuration. If telemetry is disabled, crash reporter won't collect as well.
The information collected by the reporter is minimally configured by sentry's sdk. These are the informations collected for example:
- device arch / family / model
- os kernel version / name / version
- runtime (rust) version / channel
- sentry sdk
- panic backtrace
- next.js release version
- device host name
There's no per-system uuid configurations yet.
It may need some audit if we need to omit some data included in above, while most of them seems ok to me.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
## Feature
Implements feature requested in https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/30805.
A few people including myself have been looking to use Relay with Next.JS and want to use the new Rust Compiler. This is my stab at an implementation.
### How it works?
Finds all `graphql` tagged template experssions and replaces them with `require`s to the file generated by Relay.
### Where I need help
- I've only worked with Rust a handful of times so I would appreciate any feedback on my use of language features.
- Is there any performance overhead to many duplicate usages of `require`? I imagine there's a cache in place but I want to be sure.
- I've added some unit tests & integration tests but I might be missing some use cases. Feel free to comment some use cases I'm not thinking about.
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- I haven't added any docs since this is an experimental API.
## Documentation / Examples
You're expected to be running the Relay Compiler along side Next.JS when you're developing. This is pretty standard. I wouldn't expect people to have any problem with this.
### Usage
In your `next.config.js`
```js
module.exports = {
experimental: {
relay: {
language: 'typescript', // or 'javascript`
artifactDirectory: 'path/to/you/artifact/directory' // you can leave this undefined if you did not specify one in the `relay.json`
}
}
}
```
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <6324199+timneutkens@users.noreply.github.com>
