Tim Neutkens
e169e73b45
Add hasRedbox fix ( #60522 )
...
## What?
As @leerob and I found in-person when opening #57230 the `hasRedBox()`
helper was incorrectly passing when it shouldn't pass in both the true
and false case.
This PR uses a different approach by waiting 7 seconds before checking,
this leaves enough room for HMR / reloads to apply, it doesn't
meaningfully slow down the test suite and increases reliability of the
check as you can see below in the tests that were previously passing
that are no longer passing.
I've moved these to skipped tests for landing this PR as I want to avoid
further issues being introduced while we fix them. @huozhi will
investigate these next week 👍
Failing tests that are temporarily skipped:
-
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-513b477050bf1a620697b4d16bc1e6850282cb54e0609bdc5fd34307bfa9e471R9
-
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-fa7d7c8c40914005c138d852eaf6a69ac0df51ec77bec548cbc5f0bfbdc8ebc5R25
-
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-6f9f7dc131416cb17938311939a56d8c0e685a8fe6e8fc0cf5cd04939c74f388R41
-
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-439830e340a320c56645e9d00aaf0fd0b492ddb90b6d7f9db89458ccc5158eb7R8
-
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-62938bf5cd4d84f96dde8b6bcb2c8e18099e6dfca269c4302229b79175c0250cR18
-
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/60522/files#diff-513b477050bf1a620697b4d16bc1e6850282cb54e0609bdc5fd34307bfa9e471R9
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas )
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs )
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Closes NEXT-2059
2024-01-15 09:36:44 +01:00
Gal Schlezinger
35f68bc691
[edge] improve fetch stack traces in edge runtime ( #44750 )
...
Right now, when doing the following in an Edge API:
```typescript
export default async () => {
await fetch("https://hello.world ");
};
```
The stack trace generated does not contain the actual line of code that caused the error.
This gives a bad developer experience when working with `next dev`.
This PR fixes that for this specific use case and adds a test to make sure there's no regression.
For `next start`, there's also a small change, that needs to be pushed upstream to `edge-runtime`.
In order to run user code in the Edge Runtime, we call `vm.evaluate(code: string)`. However,
if we embrace the `options` from the signature of `vm.runInContext(code, ctx, options)`, we can
pass in the filename so the stack trace is correct.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md )
2023-01-26 10:16:53 +00:00
