Includes a fix for when a tree is rendered without the styled-jsx registry being provided. It'll noop in this new version.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Use `Writable` instead of `Observable` and remove the `zen-observable` dependencies. I initially opted to use `Observable` for simplicity and fast iteration, but we should really just use `Writable` directly (or some other stream in the future).
React's streaming SSR has some [specific requirements](https://github.com/reactwg/react-18/discussions/66#discussioncomment-944266) on the stream API. Rather than trying to also squeeze a `Readable` in here, which might be more standard for node apps, I've just followed React's lead. By limiting ourselves to just `Writable`, it ought to be easier to adopt a different stream type in the future if desired.
The React `pipeToNodeWritable` API requires us to pass a stream immediately, but we don't actually have a `ServerResponse` to give it until `RenderResult.pipe(...)` is called later. For that reason, we pass React a `Writable` that we will simply forward to `res` later. This mechanism of deferring is `NodeWritablePiper`, which is just a function that can be called with `ServerResponse` (or another `Writable`, as we now do to render to string for static results) to have content written to it. `NodeWritablePiper` takes a `next` argument so that we can chain both synchronous and asynchronous pipers together.
Also does some clean up and adds another streaming test for backpressure.
Our `Observable` use has gotten sufficiently complex that it makes sense to just use a 3rd party implementation and not worry about maintaining it ourselves. As a bonus, it doesn't rely on Node APIs.
Chrome 92 started to disable `SharedArrayBuffer` without cross-origin isolation which can be enabled by sending [the page with special HTTP headers](https://web.dev/cross-origin-isolation-guide/). This change causes Chrome to emit a warning in DevTools console and [developers are confused with the message](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/21708). `util` is one of the libraries that uses `SharedArrayBuffer` and is causing the warning to appear in the console.
Luckily, the issue in `util` has been resolved in [v0.12.4] and I would like to propose applying the fixed version to this library.
For fixing #21708
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Upgrade styled-jsx to v4 for supporting concurrent mode in react 18
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
* Update styed-jsx to latest version, containing bugfixes for babel plugin and typings.
* Use `/// <reference>` instead of redeclaring types
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
This PR introduces an improved developer experience when `next lint` is run for the first time.
### Current behavior
`eslint-config-next` is a required package that must be installed before proceeding with `next lint` or `next build`:
Although this has helped many developers start using the new ESLint config, this has also resulted in a few issues:
- Users are required to install the full config (`eslint-config-next`) even if they do not use it or use the Next.js plugin directly (`eslint-plugin-next`).
- #26348
- There's some confusion on why `eslint-config-next` needs to be installed or how it should be used instead of `eslint-plugin-next`.
- #26574
- #26475
- #26438
### New behavior
Instead of enforcing `eslint-config-next` as a required package, this PR prompts the user by asking what config they would like to start. This happens when `next lint` is run for the first time **and** if no ESLint configuration is detected in the application.
<img src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12476932/124331177-e1668a80-db5c-11eb-8915-38d3dc20f5d4.gif" width="800" />
- The CLI will take care of installing `eslint` or `eslint-config-next` if either is not already installed
- Users now have the option to choose between a strict configuration (`next/core-web-vitals`) or just the base configuration (`next`)
- For users that decide to create their own ESLint configuration, or already have an existing one, **installing `eslint-config-next` will not be a requirement for `next lint` or `next build` to run**. A warning message will just show if the Next.js ESLint plugin is not detected in an ESLint config.
<img width="682" alt="Screen Shot 2021-06-25 at 3 02 12 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12476932/123473329-6cc4a680-d5c6-11eb-9a57-d5c0b89a2732.png">
---
In addition, this PR also:
- Fixes#26348
- Updates documentation to make it more clear what approach to take for new and existing ESLint configurations
Fixes#27593
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Replaces Babel with SWC for Next.js core client-side files.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
- Use SWC to compile Next.js core server files
- Ensure only @babel/runtime/helpers/interopRequireDefault helper is used
Just an initial comparison to compare size difference of this change.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
I'm not sure if this is something that y'all want but it `web-vitals` has been integrating more browser support. The major release is because they removed the [`isFinal` flag on the Metric type](d233b7b8c3).
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <timneutkens@me.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
