## Issue
The `context.getFilename()` gets the absolute path of the files, and the if statement to filter `/src` and `/app` was not working since #46609.
## Expected
Do not show a lint warning if use `beforeInteractive` inside `appDir`.
Fixes#46609#50261
This PR adds the optional `limit` parameter on String.prototype.split uses.
> If provided, splits the string at each occurrence of the specified separator, but stops when limit entries have been placed in the array. Any leftover text is not included in the array at all.
[MDN](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/split#syntax)
While the performance gain may not be significant for small texts, it can be huge for large ones.
I made a benchmark on the following repository : https://github.com/Yovach/benchmark-nodejs
On my machine, I get the following results:
`node index.js`
> normal 1: 570.092ms
> normal 50: 2.284s
> normal 100: 3.543s
`node index-optimized.js`
> optmized 1: 644.301ms
> optmized 50: 929.39ms
> optmized 100: 1.020s
The "benchmarks" numbers are :
- "lorem-1" file contains 1 paragraph of "lorem ipsum"
- "lorem-50" file contains 50 paragraphes of "lorem ipsum"
- "lorem-100" file contains 100 paragraphes of "lorem ipsum"
fixes issue #44141 , discussion #44148
This is missing and has caused me issues in production. Seems like a great polyfill to have, given that Next already polyfills so many adjacent Array methods.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: Eyas Valdez <37156127+spiltbeans@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Spinning out from #37151 and my draft PR #52845, this enables the two
basic recommended rulesets from
[typescript-eslint](https://typescript-eslint.io) for the Next.js
monorepo source code:
*
[`plugin:@typescript-eslint/recommended`](https://typescript-eslint.io/linting/configs#recommended):
Our base recommended rules that detect common bugs or _(non-stylistic)_
TypeScript bad practices
*
[`plugin:@typescript-eslint/stylistic`](https://typescript-eslint.io/linting/configs#stylistic):
Our base starting stylistic recommended for keeping codebases visually
consistent and avoiding out-of-practice visual constructs
The process I used is pretty standard (see
https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/issues/6760 for
other repos it was done on):
1. Enable those base recommended presets
2. Remove any rule settings that are now redundant
3. Reconfigure any rule whose default settings didn't seem to make sense
for this codebase
4. Add a `// Todo: ...` comment, and under it, add a disable for any
rule that immediately reported a lot of complaints
Note that this only enables the presets internally. It doesn't impact
what end-users of published packages such as Next.js or
`create-next-app` experience. That's a separate task in #52845.
I also didn't fix any existing warning from the `canary` branch. Would
you like me to do that? My preference would be a separate PR to get it
in more quickly.
Any code changes are commented inline.
---------
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
This pull request removes unnecessary caching of fsLstat calls by
calling `readdirSync` with `withFileTypes` option.
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
## Why?
```
src/app/layout.tsx
```
**eslint[@next/next/no-before-interactive-script-outside-document](https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/no-before-interactive-script-outside-document)**
> `next/script`'s `beforeInteractive` strategy should not be used outside of `pages/_document.js`.
## How?
- Possibility of pathname starts with "/" on OS X and Linux, so added condition to check file path starting with "/"
- e.g. "/src/app" or "/app"
- Added test code
Passed
- `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- `pnpm jest test/unit/eslint-plugin-next/no-before-interactive-script-outside-document.test.ts`
Extends #46609Fixes#50096
Fixes NEXT-1230
Skips pages directory warning if there is app directory in the root for `no-html-link-for-pages` lint rule.
Fixes#42448.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
fixes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/46549
The docs are wrong for now, this limitation is just in `pages/`, you can
use it anywhere in `app/`.
Since `app/` is still not stable we will emit that warning in all files
outside of `app/`.
The reported issue has a `pages` directory above the application directory. We can't detect that in eslint but this rule can just be disabled if the file is in a directory called `app/` which in the worst case disables this rule instead of opts the rule in as with the reported issue.
Fixes NEXT-730
Fixes#46559
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Changes ESLint warning message to still encourage usage of `next/image`
for the best experience, but also denoting that optimization could come
with incurred costs.
## Feature
- [x] Documentation added
- [x] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [x] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: Steven Tey <stevensteel97@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
Fixes#42604.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
## Bug
When trying to use app directory on Windows, the automatically created
`Layout.tsx` get's a lint problem for having a `<head>` element.
## Solution
Update the rule to check paths using `path.sep` rather than hardcoded
`/`
I also checked with `path.posix.sep` because some other rules was doing
that (both `path.sep` and `path.posix.sep`), so I'm just following
pattern
In #38647, @balazsorban44 has migrated the rule `no-img-element` to
typescript. The PR follows #38647 by migrating the entire
`eslint-plugin-next` to use typescript. Note it is still possible to
write new rules in javascript.
The PR does the following things:
- Migrates all `utils` to typescript
- All previous JSDoc are also converted to the type definitions
- Creates a utility method `defineRule`
- This is a stub function to provide the type check ability.
- With the `defineRule` we don't have to tediously import type
definition `Rule.RuleMetaData` and `Rule.RuleModule['create']` from
`eslint` anymore, `defineRule` will provide auto-complete and
typechecking for `meta` and `create`.
- Migrates all rules to typescript
- Extra type guards are also added to make typescript happy.
All existing `eslint-config-next` unit test cases passed after the
migration.
Follow-up on https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/38534#pullrequestreview-1035020450
This lets us use modern JS/TS syntax in ESLint rules and avoid issues like #38530 and #36693
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
