Looks like this is breaking when run against `vercel-site`, going to revert temporarily to allow investigating further without blocking canary.
Reverts vercel/next.js#46328
The current behavior is, when `appDir` is enabled, global CSS should be
allowed to be imported from anywhere (because components can be re-used
by both pages and app). Changes in #45619 made it not behaving correctly
and this PR fixes it.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This PR changes the loader logic from something like `ctx.hasAppDir ?
useAppLoaderForCSS : usePagesLoaderForCSS`, to a mental modal of
`[ctx.hasAppDir ? useAppLoaderForCSSInAppLayer : null,
usePagesLoaderForCSSInPagesLayer]`. This change makes sure that both
pages and app can exist and work well together, instead of a binary
switch.
Also renamed the loader with `-dev` removed, because it is used for
production build too.
NEXT-461
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Add default head to app dir, when there's no`head.js`, use the default
head with the following meta tags
```html
<meta charSet="utf-8" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" />
```
It will be replaced if there's custom head.js in child layout.
NEXT-169
Currently in dev the `_devPagesManifest` includes the `/app` routes as
well. However, In production, the `_buildManifest.js` does not include
the `/app` routes. This causes the `/pages` router to behave differently
in the two environments.
This change excludes the `/app` routes from `_devPagesManifest` to make
it work the same in dev/prod.
Fixes#42513Fixes#42532
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This adapts the new client hooks of `usePathname`, `useSearchParams`,
and `useRouter` to work within the `pages/` directory to aid users
attempting to migrate shared components over to the `app/` directory.
> **Exception:**
> When the pages router is not ready, `useSearchParams` will return an
empty `URLSearchParams`. This mirrors the behavior seen in the `pages/`
directory today in that `router.query` is not available until the client
hydrates.
This also adds a new option for `useRouter` to bring it line with the
correct typings with the app directory. By default, calling
`useRouter()` will return the type `NextRouter | null` to represent what
you get when you call it from a component originating from the app
directory. If you want to instead force it to return `NextRouter` as it
does today, you can pass a boolean into the `useRouter` call as such:
```ts
const router = useRouter() // typeof router === NextRouter | null
const router = useRouter(true) // typeof router === NextRouter
```
This change is designed to ease the incremental adoption of app.
When esm package that depending on react is used between `pages/` and
`app/`, it's loading the user installed react through esm loader which
doesn't go through require hook, so we cannot intercept it with
require-hook.
Disable esm resolving when `appDir` is enabled for now, prefering to
pick the cjs bundle so that react import is intercepted by require hook
and pointing to the built-in react
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Inline a react and react-dom for app dir, when `appDir` flag is enabled
opt into the built-in version for all.
For server layer react, use the react share subset for server
components.
For all server side of react-dom usage, use the server-rendering-stub.
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
- Enable newNextLinkBehavior. See #36436
- Run next/link codemod on test suite
Note that from when this lands on apps trying canary will need to run
the new-link codemod in order to upgrade.
Ideally we have to detect `<a>` while rendering the new link and warn
for it.
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Rather specific test for when you incrementally migrate using middleware and only route to the `app` route based on some condition.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
## Feature
Change server components convention from using `.server.js` / `.client.js` file extension to determine it's a server or client component to using `'client'` js literal as a directive for determine client components boundary.
React RFC: https://github.com/reactjs/rfcs/pull/189
New behavior doesn't consume `.server.js` as server components any more, if you're enabling `serverComponents` flag, every `page.js` in app dir will become server components by default. If you adding a `'client'` directive to the page, then that page will become a client component. This rule also applies to the normal js components, client components will require a `'client'` directive to indicate its identity, instead of having a `.client.js` extension.
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <3676859+shuding@users.noreply.github.com>
Continuation of https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/38817 this adds handling to allow leveraging the `experimental-edge` runtime for `app`.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <inbox@huozhi.im>
## Bug
x-ref: #38691
* Previous configured loader.issue results into a single function and will bail during next build, tune the rule set conditions to make it work for both pages and app dir
* prefer to use `mod.resourceResolveData?.path` instead of `mod.userRequest` since userRquest contains the applied loaders info
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
* test: added some test cases for new client side router
* tests: added additional test cases
* test: improved test support
* feat: added support for `<Link soft />`
* tests: improved test reliability
* tests: added more cases for catch-all routes
* tests: added app -> pages -> app tests
* tests: add tests for useCookies + useHeaders
* tests: added tests for usePreviewData
* tests: added more tests for hooks and client components
* tests: added tests for query/params handling
* tests: fix tests for param/query to use props
* tests: added some skipped tests for unimplemented features
* tests: linting
* refactor: updated TODO -> TODO-APP
* tests: added some more test cases
* tests: skipped failing test
## Client-side router for `app` directory
This PR implements the new router that leverages React 18 concurrent features like Suspense and startTransition.
It also integrates with React Server Components and builds on top of it to allow server-centric routing that only renders the part of the page that has to change.
It's one of the pieces of the implementation of https://nextjs.org/blog/layouts-rfc.
## Details
I'm going to document the differences with the current router here (will be reworked for the upgrade guide)
### Client-side cache
In the current router we have an in-memory cache for getStaticProps data so that if you prefetch and then navigate to a route that has been prefetched it'll be near-instant. For getServerSideProps the behavior is different, any navigation to a page with getServerSideProps fetches the data again.
In the new model the cache is a fundamental piece, it's more granular than at the page level and is set up to ensure consistency across concurrent renders. It can also be invalidated at any level.
#### Push/Replace (also applies to next/link)
The new router still has a `router.push` / `router.replace` method.
There are a few differences in how it works though:
- It only takes `href` as an argument, historically you had to provide `href` (the page path) and `as` (the actual url path) to do dynamic routing. In later versions of Next.js this is no longer required and in the majority of cases `as` was no longer needed. In the new router there's no way to reason about `href` vs `as` because there is no notion of "pages" in the browser.
- Both methods now use `startTransition`, you can wrap these in your own `startTransition` to get `isPending`
- The push/replace support concurrent rendering. When a render is bailed by clicking a different link to navigate to a completely different page that still works and doesn't cause race conditions.
- Support for optimistic loading states when navigating
##### Hard/Soft push/replace
Because of the client-side cache being reworked this now allows us to cover two cases: hard push and soft push.
The main difference between the two is if the cache is reused while navigating. The default for `next/link` is a `hard` push which means that the part of the cache affected by the navigation will be invalidated, e.g. if you already navigated to `/dashboard` and you `router.push('/dashboard')` again it'll get the latest version. This is similar to the existing `getServerSideProps` handling.
In case of a soft push (API to be defined but for testing added `router.softPush('/')`) it'll reuse the existing cache and not invalidate parts that are already filled in. In practice this means it's more like the `getStaticProps` client-side navigation because it does not fetch on navigation except if a part of the page is missing.
#### Back/Forward navigation
Back and Forward navigation ([popstate](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Window/popstate_event)) are always handled as a soft navigation, meaning that the cache is reused, this ensures back/forward navigation is near-instant when it's in the client-side cache. This will also allow back/forward navigation to be a high priority update instead of a transition as it is based on user interaction. Note: in this PR it still uses `startTransition` as there's no way to handle the high priority update suspending which happens in case of missing data in the cache. We're working with the React team on a solution for this particular case.
### Layouts
Note: this section assumes you've read [The layouts RFC](https://nextjs.org/blog/layouts-rfc) and [React Server Components RFC](https://reactjs.org/blog/2020/12/21/data-fetching-with-react-server-components.html)
React Server Components rendering leverages the Flight streaming mechanism in React 18, this allows sending a serializable representation of the rendered React tree on the server to the browser, the client-side React can use this serialized representation to render components client-side without the JavaScript being sent to the browser. This is one of the building blocks of Server Components. This allows a bunch of interesting features but for now I'll keep it to how it affects layouts.
When you have a `app/dashboard/layout.js` and `app/dashboard/page.js` the page will render as children of the layout, when you add another page like `app/dashboard/integrations/page.js` that page falls under the dashboard layout as well. When client-side navigating the new router automatically figures out if the page you're navigating to can be a smaller render than the whole page, in this case `app/dashboard/page.js` and `app/dashboard/integrations/page.js` share the `app/dashboard/layout.js` so instead of rendering the whole page we render below the layout component, this means the layout itself does not get re-rendered, the layout's `getServerSideProps` would not be called, and the Flight response would only hold the result of `app/dashboard/integrations/page.js`, effectively giving you the smallest patch for the UI.
---
Note: the commits in this PR were mostly work in progress to ensure it wasn't lost along the way. The implementation was reworked a bunch of times to where it is now.
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
