In the case when the user configured `output: export` and used an API Route Handler that cannot be converted to static, Next.js must throw an error.
fix NEXT-823 ([link](https://linear.app/vercel/issue/NEXT-823))
### What?
This PR introduces a new `--tailwind` flag to the `create-next-app` CLI,
to make it easier to bootstrap a Next.js app with Tailwind CSS
pre-configured. This is going to be the **default**. To opt-out of
Tailwind CSS, you can use the `--no-tailwind` flag.
### Why?
Tailwind CSS is one of the most popular styling solutions right now, and
we would like to make it easier to get started.
Currently, the closest you can come to this is by running `pnpm create
next-app -e with-tailwindcss` which will clone the
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/tree/canary/examples/with-tailwindcss
example. But that example is not configured for the App Router. This PR
will let you add Tailwind CSS to both `app/`, `pages/`, and start out
with TypeScript or JavaScript via the CLI prompts.
(Some community feedback
https://twitter.com/dev_jonaskaas/status/1632367991827443713,
https://twitter.com/samselikoff/status/1634662473331617794)
### How?
We are adding 4 new templates to the CLI bundle.
> Note: The styling is not pixel-perfect compared to the current
templates (using CSS modules) to require fewer overrides, but I tried to
match it as close as possible. Here are a few screenshots:
<details>
<summary><b>Current, light</b></summary>
<img
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18369201/224733372-9dba86fe-9191-471d-ad9f-ab904c47f544.png"/>
</details>
<details>
<summary><b>Tailwind (new), light</b></summary>
<img
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18369201/224733610-038d9d0f-634d-4b69-b5c2-a5056b56760c.png"/>
</details>
<details>
<summary><b>Current, dark, responsive</b></summary>
<img
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18369201/224733790-9b4d730c-0336-4dbe-bc10-1cae1d7fd145.png"/>
</details>
<details>
<summary><b>Tailwind (new), dark, responsive</b></summary>
<img
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18369201/224734375-28384bbc-2c3a-4125-8f29-c102f3b7aa1d.png"/>
</details>
#### For reviewers
This introduces 4 new templates, with a very similar code base to the
original ones. To keep the PR focused, I decided to copy over duplicate
code, but we could potentially create a shared folder for files that are
the same across templates to somewhat reduce the CLI size. Not sure if
it's worth it, let me know. Probably fine for now, but something to
consider if we are adding more permutations in the future.
---
~Work remaining:~
- [x] app+ts
- [x] layout
- [x] dark mode
- [x] media queries
- [x] animations
- [x] app+js
- [x] pages+ts
- [x] pages+js
- [x] prompt/config
- [x] deprecate Tailwind CSS example in favor of CLI
- [x] update docs
- [x] add test
- [x] add [Prettier
plugin](https://github.com/tailwindlabs/prettier-plugin-tailwindcss)
Closes NEXT-772
Related #45814, #44286
Previously when we move to metadata images to custom app routes, when the image files get imported, it matches the `next-image-loader` rule which accidentally generate a static file into media.
This PR appends the metadata reource query to the imported rerource, and then skip in the `next-metadata-route-loader` so they won't get applied by image loader or emit any unexpected assets
Fixes#39330.
I've not added a new test, but extended the existing test instead (and
re-enabled it).
It seems to me that a custom next/image config was not considered during
static generation (which itself uses `next export`?) before. Adding the
config to `renderOpts` in `packages/next/src/export/index.ts` resolves
the issue.
Support top level static `robots.txt` and `sitemap.xml` as metadata
route in app directory. When those files are placed in top root
directory
Refactored a bit the page files matching logic, to reuse it between dev
server and build
Closes NEXT-267
This PR makes `typedRoutes` stricter by constraining generics in `Route` to type string. I've also made generating types for routes a bit more efficient by moving `redirects` and `rewrites`'s processing to the plugin's constructor since `rewrites` and `redirects` don't change in both dev and prod.
I've also been trying to fix a bug where route types doesn't generate all the routes (some appear, some don't), but I've got no clues since that doesn't seem easy to reproduce (perhaps it only happens in my case?)
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
## Background
In the early days, `next export` was created when Next.js was SSR-only in order to statically export your pages for self hosting where no server was available. However, around the time `getStaticProps()` and `getStaticPaths()` were introduced, Next.js began [automatically generating static pages](https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/automatic-static-optimization) (SSG first and SSR opt-in) during `next build`. This meant there were very few reasons to use `next export` and it started to become a stale feature.
## Problem We Need To Solve
Users targeting `next export` currently have a really bad experience. They start a new project and use all the features Next.js has to offer because they all features work with `next dev`. Then when development is finished and it comes time to deploy, running `next build && next export` will fail with errors for [unsupported features](https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/static-html-export#unsupported-features).
## Solution
This PR introduces a new configuration option, `output: 'export'`, to indicate that the user intends to run `next export`.
With this change, Next.js can fail fast during `next dev` if any [unsupported features](https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/static-html-export#unsupported-features) are used, thereby improving developer experience with instant feedback.
```js
/**
* @type {import('next').NextConfig}
*/
const nextConfig = {
output: 'export',
}
module.exports = nextConfig
```
Changes ESLint warning message to still encourage usage of `next/image`
for the best experience, but also denoting that optimization could come
with incurred costs.
## Feature
- [x] Documentation added
- [x] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [x] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: Steven Tey <stevensteel97@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
fixes#46611
this PR fixed customer dist type(`distDir` option in next.config.js) in
`tsconfig.json` will be a hard coded absolute path issue which is a bug
from PR #46249
since dist type only be added when user using app dir, to reproduce this
issue you need to make `app dir` toggle on and add a `distDir` option in
`next.config.js` file
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
---------
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
This PR fixes some issue caused by PR 46327, which asserted that
`NextBuildContext.original(Rewrites|Redirects)` are defined although
`config._original(Redirects|Rewrites)` (which these two copied from) are
not actually defined when `config.redirects`/`config.rewrites` are not
as well (see `loadRedirects`/`loadRewrites`). So this PR fixes that by
removing those assertions and checking whether those are defined in
`createRouteDefinitions` before iterating them.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
fixes#46104
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: Wyatt Johnson <accounts+github@wyattjoh.ca>
This PR refactors the implementation of `Route<T>` to be more compact
(2/3 fewer union types), and adds support for static rewrites and
redirects. Check the updated test for more details.
In the future I plan to continue to refactor this by extract static
routes out as unions (instead of always relying on type inference) for
better autocompletion. Maybe a dev-only feature?
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Fixes#46401
This PR fixes route groups not working with Windows by handling slashes properly by replacing RegEx expressions with `ensureLeadingSlash`, `getPageFromPath` (which uses `normalizePathSep`),... It also adds a test that ensures `typedRoutes` works with route groups to `app-types.test.js`.
It also replaces `fs.readFile` and String's `replaceAll` that were used to augment `next` in PR 46332 (which were rather overkill and inefficient in my opinion) with a `export * from "next/types/index.d.ts"`.
I've also converted `edgeRouteTypes` and `nodeRouteTypes` to 2 Sets so as to avoid duplications. When we write type `Route`, we also check if a route in `nodeRouteTypes` is already defined in `edgeRouteTypes`.
Types like `SearchOrHash`, `Suffix`, `SafeSlug`,... have also been made private to module "next" (before this PR users could access to these types anywhere in their workspace, which doesn't seem like an expected behaviour in my opinion).
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This is a small refactor to image optimization tests. Previously, the
`ctx` object was used for input options as well as next.config.js
options but this PR separates the latter into `nextConfigImages`.
Add `contentDispositionType` config to Image Optimization API so the user can configure `inline` vs `attachment`.
This is recommended when `dangerouslyAllowSVG` is enabled but can also be used when its disabled.
unrelated changes:
- add missing await
- fix TYPO in test comment
This issue was caused by the fact that we have been replacing `@/` ->
`[importAlias]` even in tsconfig.json itself.
fixes#45884
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
When passing absolute URLs to `<Link>` on a Next.js site using
Internationalized Routing, the site's domain will be prepended to the
URL, causing broken links. This PR checks if the provided URL is an
absolute URL, and if so, skips the logic that prepends the domain.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This ensures we correctly handle the new route matchers with turbopack.
Also updates the custom-routes test suite to allow it to run against
turbopack although relies on changes in
https://github.com/vercel/turbo/pull/3894 for the tests to run
correctly.
This updates our CI testing flow to only run against LTS Node.js version
on PRs and then run against the maintenance Node.js version when cutting
a release. This will allow speeding up PR test runs to get feedback
faster and remove un-necessary duplicate testing as it's very rare a
change breaks the maintenance Node.js version but not the LTS version.
## Bug
The `next build` command is silently overriding the user's tsconfig when
it shouldn't be; this results in mismatched behavior between `tsc
--noEmit` and `yarn build` and user confusion.
For example, a configuration option like `"moduleResolution":
"nodenext"`, which is preserved and respected by `next dev`, will be
silently overridden to `"moduleResolution": "node"` during `next build`.
This change:
- Fixes#38854
- (probably fixes) #45452 (I have not verified)
- (probably fixes) #41189 (I have not verified)
## Details
Next has a concept of both _defaults_ and _permitted options_ when
modifying/validating the user's tsconfig. The user's config is only
modified if it does not match the _permitted options_. This means that
if the user has specified a permitted value like `"moduleResolution":
"nodenext"`, it will not be overwritten in the user's config file.
However, there was some logic in `runTypeCheck.ts` that did not
adequately capture this nuance – instead, it spread all of the defaults
into the tsconfig it was building before running typecheck, which meant
that if a user had specified an option that was _permitted_ but
_non-default_, it would be overwritten, silently, during `yarn build`
only.
Because Next is already (1) rewriting the TSconfig in
`writeConfigurationDefaults` when the user's config doesn't line up with
what we're expecting and (2) verifying the user's TSConfig remains
correct (in `verifyTypeScriptSetup`) during a `next build`, I believe
that it is safe to remove this config-steamrolling behavior.
## Documentation / Examples
I believe this is strictly a bugfix; it updates the behavior of `next
build` to conform to the same configuration behavior exhibited by `tsc
--noEmit` and `next dev`. Since this is already the user expectation, it
should not require documentation changes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#45088.
Rewrite the type guard implementation, it now works via 2 parts:
- `Diff<A, B>` this makes sure that `B` is either `any` or extends `A`, and then excludes all fields in `A` from `B`, only keeps the extra fields
- `checkFields<X>()` ensures that `X` doesn't have any fields
So with `checkFields<Diff<ExpectedInterface, Interface>>()` we can ensure that it is a valid interface and it does not have extra fields. For functions, we use the same utility to check parameter types and return types.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
I believe this fixes `<Link>`s that appear inside an `<svg>`. For
example:
```typescript
<svg width={200} height={200}>
<Link href="/about">
<a>
<text x={0} y={20}>About</text>
</a>
</Link>
</svg>
```
There's a comment in `next/link` (["anchors inside an svg have a
lowercase
nodeName"](bef709bc74/packages/next/client/link.tsx (L163)))
that implies `Link`s are supposed to work inside an `svg`, but at the
moment, I'm finding that clicking the link causes a full page reload.
This seems to be because Next.js considers the link to be a 'modified'
event (as per `isModifiedEvent`). In the case where the event's
`currentTarget` is an `SVGAElement` (rather than a `HTMLAnchorElement`),
the `event.currentTarget.target` is actually an
[`SVGAnimatedString`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/SVGAnimatedString).
This looks a bit like `{"animVal": "", "baseVal": ""}`, so the `(target
&& target !== '_self')` check is truthy.
Using
[`getAttribute`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Element/getAttribute)
instead seems to consistently give a string value in either (SVG or
HTML) case.
I've attempted to add a test, but I haven't worked out how to run it
yet...
---------
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
This adds updated matching handle for the server to separate out the matching and executing of different route types e.g. page routes, API routes, and app routes.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This adds a top-level experimental config for including/excluding files
from the file traces. This replaces the page level
`unstable_includeFiles`/`unstable_excludeFiles` as those had some
drawbacks such as not being supported for API routes as these files
aren't required during build to gather the configs, having to duplicate
includes/excludes for multiple pages, and causing more confusion for
where the globs were meant to be relative to.
The new top-level configs allow mapping page globs to includes/excludes
so they can be shared across multiple pages or a single page. These can
also affect the `next-server` trace by specifying that as the key if
necessary. The previous `outputFileTraceIgnores` config is automatically
mapped to the new config with a deprecation warning.
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
Disable streaming SSR for `pages`, preferring the static rendering. This
was leftover from when we implemented the server components alpha on
`pages` and causes issues for people upgrading from Next.js 12 to 13
when the `chunked` response is unexpected, e.g. with certain CDN setups.
Streaming is the default in `app` and that has the right implementation
to fully leverage streaming in React including when navigating
client-side as the router is built around React transitions.
If `config.i18n` exists with `defaultLocale` and there's a redirect that
looks like this:
```js
{
source: '/',
destination: '/destination',
permanent: false,
}
```
Then, if you access `/`:
- **Expected:** It redirects to `/destination`
- **Actual:** redirects to `/<defaultLocale>/destination`
This PR fixes it by adding a missing special-case logic for `/` in
`packages/next/src/lib/load-custom-routes.ts`.
x-ref: [slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03S8ED1DKM/p1676271611253739)
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Implements alpha version of type checking for `Link`'s `href`. To opt-into this feature, `experimental.appDir` and `experimental.typedRoutes` need to be enabled, and the project needs to be using TypeScript.
Once enabled, Next.js will generate a link definition in `.next/types` that contains information of existing routes, and it will be included by TS. In the definition we simply declare types for the `Link` module.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Adds additional integration tests for `@next/mdx`.
- Test mdx-rs
- Test `mdx-components.tsx`
- Tests development and production. Previously it only checked
development.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
First step for making RSC responses use gzip/brotli.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
- [x] Depends on https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/45776
Turbotrace occupies too many memories while running; this PR makes it
run after the webpack build is finished, it can reduce the memory
hogging by webpack and turbotrace, thus avoiding OOM
The `maxFiles` option in turbotrace is removed because there is
`memoryLimit` option takes over its role.
Close WEB-556
