### What?
- Add a comment to issues labeled with `resolved`
Note to maintainers: it won't autoclose the issue. (This would need to
be added to [`nissuer`](https://github.com/balazsorban44/nissuer) as a
new feature)
Rendered comment
[here](b868cf95f2/.github/good-first-issue.md)
- I also reorganized the label comments to its own folder since we have
a few now.
### Why?
After verifying if an open issue has been fixed, a common task is to
comment on it and tell people to upgrade or open a new issue if it
persists. (Ideally, PRs would reference every issue they fix, but
sometimes we need to do this chore manually)
### How?
Using `nissuer`'s
[comment-label](https://github.com/balazsorban44/nissuer#label-management).
Closes NEXT-2306
### What?
Add a comment to issues labeled with `good first issue`. Rendered
comment
[here](b868cf95f2/.github/good-first-issue.md).
### Why?
We have historically marked issues with this label, but rarely did it
make someone contribute. A few times I have seen people asking for
permission first instead of contributing. This comment will clarify the
fact that they can just do so.
### How?
Using `nissuer`'s
[comment-label](https://github.com/balazsorban44/nissuer#label-management).
Closes NEXT-2256
---------
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
## What?
Been seeing a mismatch in total amount of tests reported in
areweturboyet for some time now and dug into that problem. Turns out
that when the test suite fails it does not stop reporting as the default
for upload-artifact is to warn when the file is missing. In this case we
want it to error so that the reporting does not go through to the
website as tests would be missing.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Closes NEXT-2247
### What
Closes PACK-2284
This PR upgrades `upload/download-artifact` action to the latest
version. Per its claim, it can be faster 90% compare to the current in
worst case use case.
Below's comparision between this PR vs. current branch for the datadog
report
Cuts download time meaningfully different. Since we use upload/download
in other places as well (i.e download next-swc binary) overall CI time
would be improved.
The challenage is artifact@v4 introduced breaking changes to not to
allow implicitly merge upload / download with duplicated name. PR
introduced unique key for those, then apply download with pattern &
merge.
### What?
In this PR #60988, I think (please correct me if I'm wrong) it was meant
to block GitHub reproduction links like `https://github.com/username` &
`https://github.com`. However, the last regex `github.com` will block
all the github.com links
### Why?
So that people can use a GithHb repo as reproduction link
### How?
Fix the regex, from `github.com` to `github.com$`
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
### What?
enable the custom allocator flag to enable mialloc.
allow to configure custom allocator on napi level.
### Why?
It's faster and we had it enabled before.
It was disable before as `next-core` is used with no default features in
workspace
Native Build: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/actions/runs/7388725004
Closes PACK-2185
---------
Co-authored-by: OJ Kwon <1210596+kwonoj@users.noreply.github.com>
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
-->
### What?
This PR refactors organization for the rust side packages to build
`next-swc`.
### Why?
We had some historical legacy around package structures, have ambiguous
name for `core` / `next-core`. One contains swc transform visitor for
the next.js, and the other one is new for turbopack's core next.js
features. In addition to that, there was a package dependency chain
prevents to use `core` in the turobpack / next-swc both, so each time
porting a transformer into turbopack it requires to extract new
dependency to be imported in the both place.
PR touches its organization - while PR is large to touch various files,
the crux is summarized at
2cedd06ea5
:
1. `core` becomes `next-custom-transforms`, also this becomes an
agnostic pkg can be imported in turbopack / wasm / next-swc
2. simplify dependency chain to import next-custom-transforms, organized
as below
```mermaid
flowchart TD
C(next-custom-transforms) --> A(napi)
C(next-custom-transforms) --> B(wasm)
D(next-core) --> A(napi)
E(next-build) --> A(napi)
F(next-api) --> A(napi)
C(next-custom-transforms) --> D
D(next-core) --> F(next-api)
D(next-core) --> E(next-build)
```
`impl CustomTransformer` for the each transform still lives in
`next-core`, so turbopack specific dependency is isolated under
`next-core/build/api`.
Closes PACK-2201
Closes PACK-2202
---------
Co-authored-by: hrmny <8845940+ForsakenHarmony@users.noreply.github.com>
This was incorrectly setting the upper bound on the `--group` argument
to our test runners (ie, `11/122`), which was causing a lot of tests to
be missed.
Closes NEXT-1851
We don't want to perform this check for stable releases since those are
never initiated by the cron task, as otherwise it would fail when going
from canary -> stable as no commits would land in-between.
Closes NEXT-1836
This makes some critical modifications to the app render pipeline when
PPR has been enabled for pages with segments defining:
```js
export const dynamic = "force-dynamic"
```
Importantly, it no longer modifies the revalidation time to zero for
those pages, and now falls back to the provided default revalidation
time. When static render occurs, if the page being rendered has a
segment config defining `dynamic === "force-dynamic"`, then it will
postpone at the root of the component tree. This ensures that no render
code is executed for the page, as the entirety of the tree will have
postponed. This fixes the bug where the flight prefetch wasn't generated
correctly as well.
### What?
A follow up for #58267 and #58394.
We no longer need the git branch for history it's stored in datadog now
and we also decided that we no longer need slack reporting.
Closes PACK-2039
---------
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
Since we reset the test project on every e2e CI run, deployment protection is automatically enabled by default.
This adds an option to the reset project workflow to disable deployment protection. Our test runners need to be able to hit these pages from an unauthenticated browser in order for the tests to work.
Verified tests are running properly in [this run](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/actions/runs/6971348806/job/18971225559) (fixing any failing tests themselves are out of scope for this PR; will evaluate once the run finishes)
Closes NEXT-1732
We have identical `resetProject` code used in `bench/vercel` and our e2e workflow action -- this updates the `resetProject` script to side-effects free (hence removing the env var) and shared between bench & e2e
Closes NEXT-1731
### What?
continuation of https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/57851, since it is from a remote branch that I don't have access to write.
Co-authored-by: Maia Teegarden <2865858+padmaia@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <6324199+timneutkens@users.noreply.github.com>
Since we separated unit tests into its own job in PR https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/55621, we can now run unit tests against Node.js 18 and Node.js 20 (maintenance and lts) using a matrix.
