### What?
This PR introduces a new `--tailwind` flag to the `create-next-app` CLI,
to make it easier to bootstrap a Next.js app with Tailwind CSS
pre-configured. This is going to be the **default**. To opt-out of
Tailwind CSS, you can use the `--no-tailwind` flag.
### Why?
Tailwind CSS is one of the most popular styling solutions right now, and
we would like to make it easier to get started.
Currently, the closest you can come to this is by running `pnpm create
next-app -e with-tailwindcss` which will clone the
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/tree/canary/examples/with-tailwindcss
example. But that example is not configured for the App Router. This PR
will let you add Tailwind CSS to both `app/`, `pages/`, and start out
with TypeScript or JavaScript via the CLI prompts.
(Some community feedback
https://twitter.com/dev_jonaskaas/status/1632367991827443713,
https://twitter.com/samselikoff/status/1634662473331617794)
### How?
We are adding 4 new templates to the CLI bundle.
> Note: The styling is not pixel-perfect compared to the current
templates (using CSS modules) to require fewer overrides, but I tried to
match it as close as possible. Here are a few screenshots:
<details>
<summary><b>Current, light</b></summary>
<img
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18369201/224733372-9dba86fe-9191-471d-ad9f-ab904c47f544.png"/>
</details>
<details>
<summary><b>Tailwind (new), light</b></summary>
<img
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18369201/224733610-038d9d0f-634d-4b69-b5c2-a5056b56760c.png"/>
</details>
<details>
<summary><b>Current, dark, responsive</b></summary>
<img
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18369201/224733790-9b4d730c-0336-4dbe-bc10-1cae1d7fd145.png"/>
</details>
<details>
<summary><b>Tailwind (new), dark, responsive</b></summary>
<img
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18369201/224734375-28384bbc-2c3a-4125-8f29-c102f3b7aa1d.png"/>
</details>
#### For reviewers
This introduces 4 new templates, with a very similar code base to the
original ones. To keep the PR focused, I decided to copy over duplicate
code, but we could potentially create a shared folder for files that are
the same across templates to somewhat reduce the CLI size. Not sure if
it's worth it, let me know. Probably fine for now, but something to
consider if we are adding more permutations in the future.
---
~Work remaining:~
- [x] app+ts
- [x] layout
- [x] dark mode
- [x] media queries
- [x] animations
- [x] app+js
- [x] pages+ts
- [x] pages+js
- [x] prompt/config
- [x] deprecate Tailwind CSS example in favor of CLI
- [x] update docs
- [x] add test
- [x] add [Prettier
plugin](https://github.com/tailwindlabs/prettier-plugin-tailwindcss)
Closes NEXT-772
Related #45814, #44286
Since we intend to update our vendored copy of React frequently, I wrote
a script to automate the steps.
Basic usage (defaults to most recent React canary version):
```sh
pnpm run sync-react
```
Specify a canary version:
```sh
pnpm run sync-react --version 18.3.0-next-41110021f-20230301
```
Update package.json but skip installing the dependencies automatically:
```sh
pnpm run sync-react --no-install
```
At the end it will print out a changelog so you can copy/paste it into
the PR description.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Leverage edge build of react-server-dom-webpack on server and keep
browser build of it for client build
Closes NEXT-606
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Adds additional integration tests for `@next/mdx`.
- Test mdx-rs
- Test `mdx-components.tsx`
- Tests development and production. Previously it only checked
development.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
When incompatibilities with upgrades to `swc` occur between releases,
these changes expand the existing `pnpm clean` script to additionally
run any `clean` script under any of the lerna packages. In this case, a
new script was created under `packages/next-swc` that removes
`packages/next-swc/native/*`, allowing the default to automatically use
the WASM build.
Users wanting to reset their repository can now run:
```sh
pnpm clean
```
Future packages or outputs that are built should have their `clean`
script remove them to allow for easy repository resetting.
This reverts commit fd9ec646ac.
It seems that there is an issue with caching of inputs which uses stale
files.
We also had to disable caching of `pnpm-lock.yaml` because it requires
stable package locations chich we removed.
Updates our test config to take advantage of more concurrency and also
updates to leverage the playwright docker image to reduce flakes from
actions/setup-node stalling or playwright dependencies stalling on `apt
install`.
This reduces our test times from upwards of 30 minutes down to back
around 15 minutes.
Continuation of https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/42711 fixing
latest turbo usage in musl environment
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This PR adds a basic test case to ensure Next.js and Edge Runtime
changes don't break the image generation feature, as well as record the
usage.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [x] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Ensures we have latest patches in turbo CLI.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Updates builtin react to latest release on next channel
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
This PR implements a configuration option in `next.config.js` to support
for rust-based MDX compiler (https://github.com/wooorm/mdxjs-rs).
Currently it is marked as experimental, as mdx-rs and loader both may
need some iteration to fix regressions.
When a new experimental flag is set (`mdxRs: true`), instead of using
`@mdx/js` loader `next/mdx` loads a new webpack loader instead.
Internally, it mostly mimics mdx/js's loader behavior, however actual
compilation will be delegated into next/swc's binding to call mdx-rs's
compiler instead.
I choose to use next-swc to expose its binding function, as mdx-rs
internally uses swc already and creating new binary can double up
bytesize (with all the complex processes of publishing new package).
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
We insert the content returning from `useServerInsertedHTML` to head
element for app dir, but it shouldn't only inject once since there're
suspense boundaries that could hold insertions.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
We found a case where 14.0.0 breaking with private class methods, such
as:
```js
class C {
#x() { return 42; }
x() {
return this.#x();
}
}
```
This feature was introduced in Node.js 14.6.0, so we can bump the
minimum version.
See https://node.green
Bundle the ssr client layer for RSC, this solves the problem when
there's an esm package is using on client components, but esm imports
the installed react instead of the built-in react version since esm
imports is not intercepted by require hook.
After bundling the ssr client layer and treating react as externals, now
react compiles as cjs externals and could be intercepted by require
hook, other code are bundled together which can also get optimized.
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This PR updates `@types/node` to `14.14.31`. The most important type is
that `ParsedUrlQuery` can hold `undefined` so we are updating the code
here to explicitly handle those cases. Aside from it we are adding a
global definition taken from NodeJS for `AsyncLocalStorage` that we
export in `server.d.ts`
Next.js 13 will require React 18.
In this PR I've only updated the peerDependency and removed the test runs in GH actions. Further cleanup will follow later, this allows us to remove the code supporting it later.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
Inline a react and react-dom for app dir, when `appDir` flag is enabled
opt into the built-in version for all.
For server layer react, use the react share subset for server
components.
For all server side of react-dom usage, use the server-rendering-stub.
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Currently `react-dom` isn't handled as an external dependency in SSR,
unlike `react`. This means that the ReactDOM imported by client
components isn't the same instance as the ReactDOM that does SSR.
This PR also upgrades React experimental to the latest version.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
As discussed this updates our required minimum Node.js version to `v14` as `v12` is no longer being maintained. Since our targets for babel and swc already target the actively used Node.js version no change has been made there.
Re-lands #40335 but without modifying the lock file.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Utilize `turbo` for `dev`, and make sure polyfills are built. Fixes#40334
Another option would be to document that an initial `pnpm build` is necessary in [`CONTRIBUTING.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#developing).
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
@ijjk moving this here.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
For some context:
https://vercel.slack.com/archives/CGU8HUTUH/p1662124179102509
Adds `@next/font` package.
`scripts/update-google-fonts.js` generates functions and metadata for
all available google fonts. The metadata is used in `loader.ts` to
validate font options (from #40221). It then fetches the CSS from google
fonts, downloads the font files and emits them as static assets.
The actual integration with `packages/next` and integration tests
depends on #40221, will follow up with new PR.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
## Problem
Currently the Next.js infer utility (`InferGetServerSidePropsType` and
`InferGetStaticPropsType`) types can lead to a wrong inferred types
(`never`). This happens if these functions return something different
than: `{props: {}}`.
**Example:** `getServerSideProps`
```typescript
export async function getServerSideProps({ query }: GetServerSidePropsContext) {
if (query.foo) {
return {
notFound: true,
}
}
return {
props: {
foo: "bar"
},
}
}
type PageProps = InferGetServerSidePropsType<typeof getServerSideProps>
// => type PageProps = never
```
**Example:** `getStaticProps`
```typescript
import type { InferGetStaticPropsType, GetStaticPropsContext } from 'next'
export async function getStaticProps(context: GetStaticPropsContext) {
if (context.params?.bar) {
return {
notFound: true,
}
}
return {
props: {
foo: 'bar',
},
}
}
type PageProps = InferGetStaticPropsType<typeof getStaticProps>
// => type PageProps = never
```
This is because the first infer condition of the utility type is not
satified leading to a never result.
```typescript
export type InferGetServerSidePropsType<T> = T extends GetServerSideProps<
infer P, // <- NOT SATISFIED
any
>
? P
: T extends (
context?: GetServerSidePropsContext<any>
) => Promise<GetServerSidePropsResult<infer P>>
? P
: never // <- NOT SATISFIED
```
## Solution
I have experimented with different solutions ending with a much simpler
type, that is faster to execute, easier to read and universally usable
for both prop variations.
```typescript
/**
* Flow:
* - Make sure getStaticProps is a function
* - Get its return type
* - Extract the one that contains {props: any}
* - Return the props
*/
export type InferGetStaticPropsType<T extends (args: any) => any> = Extract<
Awaited<ReturnType<T>>,
{ props: any }
>['props']
```
## Bug
- [x] Related issues: fixes#36615, #15913,
https://twitter.com/leeerob/status/1563540593003106306
- [x] Type tests added
## Future thoughts
Since `InferGetStaticPropsType` and `InferGetServerSidePropsType` are
now the same, it's api could be merged into one utility type (e.g:
InferNextProps). I recommend doing this in a different PR.
## Additional info
I have tested this approach using the following [external
package](https://www.npmjs.com/package/infer-next-props-type)
(@timneutkens sorry for the late PR). Since about 12 Month I haven't
received any negative feedback (issues) regarding this approach.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Fixes build errors related to
https://github.com/browserslist/caniuse-lite/issues/102
see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/actions/runs/3082979772/jobs/4983345078
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Only upgrade react-exp.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Continues #39778Closes#40499
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
- Use React.startTransition instead of useTransition
- Upgrade to latest React experimental
- Split router cache invalidate into separate function
Some minor cleanup while verifying behaviors.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
In order to make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we
request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
This serves to add support for [Subresource
Integrity](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Subresource_Integrity)
hashes for scripts added from the new app directory. This also has
support for utilizing nonce values passed from request headers (expected
to be generated per request in middleware) in the bootstrapping scripts
via the `Content-Security-Policy` header as such:
```
Content-Security-Policy: script-src 'nonce-2726c7f26c'
```
Which results in the inline scripts having a new `nonce` attribute hash
added. These features combined support for setting an aggressive Content
Security Policy on scripts loaded.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Typescript published 4.8.2 today and it fails CI, bump our typescript version to 4.8.2 and tweak some typings to make existing e2e typescript tests work properly
* Bump web-vitals from 3.0.0-beta to 3.0.0 stable for typing fix (there's an undefined type but it wasn't caught by ts 4.7), also force compiled it as CJS for pre-compiled
* Bump ncc to 3.34.0 for ts-loader compatibility for new typescript version, ncc 3.33.x cannot work with ts 4.8
* Update pre-compiled
### Problem
esm modules imports from client components will be compiled to `m = import('module-name')` when webpack bundles them for server components flight rendering. In this case, they will all become async modules since dyanmic imports will return a promise which react flight cannot handle it then results into module resolving error on server flight rendering.
### Solution
* React flight renderer supports handling async modules in https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/25138
* On next.js side leverage the module proxy change for each client reference, to make sure it always resolve the correct client module
The idea is wrapping each module with a module proxy, and if the module is async and accessed as thenable, it will return a new module reference with `async` label to tell react to handle it as async modules:
exported client reference `*` --> not async module (non thenable) --> original module reference `''`
exported client reference `*` --> it's async module (thenable) --> wrapped module reference `'*'` with `async` label
### Note
Since we need to check if user having incorrect gSSP/gSP specifying in layout client componet, so we still need to parse it and assign those info to the proxy (Does client module containing `ssr`, `ssg` exports). Otherwise the proxy will return the cached module reference
Upgrade experimental React, and render link tags directly in the tree during development. The client bundle won't import CSS anymore, and server CSS imports will be transpiled into no-op strings just for HMR to use.
## Follow Ups
- [ ] Flash of unstyled elements when reloading styles
- [ ] Collect client style imports
- [ ] Console warning for duplicated resources
- [ ] Tests
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
* Use require hook and alias to resolve styled-jsx
* re-export styled-jsx types from compiled
* fix lint
* add test for styled-jsx css
* setup require hook in server
* compile import path to styled-jsx/style
* revert require hook
* add test for server styled-jsx resolving
* update test
* pre copy styled-jsx assets
* fix styled-jsx dts
* add npmrc for styled-jsx e2e test
* load require hook directly
* rm legacy test
* fix lint
* fix pnpm install error
* split require hook
* only alias styled-jsx
* make styled-jsx resolving statically analyzable
* update test
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Use flush effects to custom apply css-in-js solution to app. Re-introduce flush effects to app-render, and remove default support of styled-jsx in `app/`. So that users will choose their own css-in-js solution if they need any customization. styled-jsx won't appear in client bundle if you didn't use it.
For now we have to inject the initial styles before `</head>` to avoid hydration errors. Later on we can remove this once react can handle it.
- [x] inject styles before end of head element
- [x] add tests
This commit allows the users to import URLPattern from `next/server`,
by defining a key that uses `global.URLPattern`.
Why is this any good? or: why don't we add URLPattern to the global namespace?
URLPattern is exposed as global on Edge Runtime _only_. This means that if we define a
constructor in global namespace in our TypeScript definitions, people might
have runtime errors in their Node.js functions.
Importing from `next/server` enables users to get the constructor without
risking in runtime errors and wrong type definitions.
Keep in mind, that with the current implementation, we do not check if the
constructor actually exists, but `next/server` shouldn't be imported in
Node.js functions, AFAIK.
## Related
- Fixes#38131
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR updates the Edge Runtime to use a new version that loads dependencies differently. This addresses https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/38766 so `instanceof` works as expected.
It involved a few code changes, mostly regarding to types. The most important change is that the `Runner` function in the sandbox doesn't take a `ReadableStream` as `body` anymore since this implies creating the instance on "node land" and makes the runtime `fetch` function not to be able to compare with `ReadableStream` using `instanceof`. Instead we introduce a "clonable body" abstraction that allows to create the `ReadableStream` from `Readable` by using the edge runtime primitive which would hold the correct prototype.
Also, this PR changes the way we pre-compile the Edge Runtime to adapt it to the new version.
Updates to latest turbo which includes patches for cached files.
x-ref: [slack thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C02CDC2ALJH/p1657767763630359?thread_ts=1657757803.039099&cid=C02CDC2ALJH)
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Ensures you can use server context when navigating.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This PR introduces an environment variable that allows to modify the `EdgeRuntime` value on compilation time.
This is done to allow cloud providers like Vercel to have a different value, and enable user code and 3rd party libraries to have different code paths depending on the Edge Functions provider.
## Related
- Related to #30739
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Client-side router for `app` directory
This PR implements the new router that leverages React 18 concurrent features like Suspense and startTransition.
It also integrates with React Server Components and builds on top of it to allow server-centric routing that only renders the part of the page that has to change.
It's one of the pieces of the implementation of https://nextjs.org/blog/layouts-rfc.
## Details
I'm going to document the differences with the current router here (will be reworked for the upgrade guide)
### Client-side cache
In the current router we have an in-memory cache for getStaticProps data so that if you prefetch and then navigate to a route that has been prefetched it'll be near-instant. For getServerSideProps the behavior is different, any navigation to a page with getServerSideProps fetches the data again.
In the new model the cache is a fundamental piece, it's more granular than at the page level and is set up to ensure consistency across concurrent renders. It can also be invalidated at any level.
#### Push/Replace (also applies to next/link)
The new router still has a `router.push` / `router.replace` method.
There are a few differences in how it works though:
- It only takes `href` as an argument, historically you had to provide `href` (the page path) and `as` (the actual url path) to do dynamic routing. In later versions of Next.js this is no longer required and in the majority of cases `as` was no longer needed. In the new router there's no way to reason about `href` vs `as` because there is no notion of "pages" in the browser.
- Both methods now use `startTransition`, you can wrap these in your own `startTransition` to get `isPending`
- The push/replace support concurrent rendering. When a render is bailed by clicking a different link to navigate to a completely different page that still works and doesn't cause race conditions.
- Support for optimistic loading states when navigating
##### Hard/Soft push/replace
Because of the client-side cache being reworked this now allows us to cover two cases: hard push and soft push.
The main difference between the two is if the cache is reused while navigating. The default for `next/link` is a `hard` push which means that the part of the cache affected by the navigation will be invalidated, e.g. if you already navigated to `/dashboard` and you `router.push('/dashboard')` again it'll get the latest version. This is similar to the existing `getServerSideProps` handling.
In case of a soft push (API to be defined but for testing added `router.softPush('/')`) it'll reuse the existing cache and not invalidate parts that are already filled in. In practice this means it's more like the `getStaticProps` client-side navigation because it does not fetch on navigation except if a part of the page is missing.
#### Back/Forward navigation
Back and Forward navigation ([popstate](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Window/popstate_event)) are always handled as a soft navigation, meaning that the cache is reused, this ensures back/forward navigation is near-instant when it's in the client-side cache. This will also allow back/forward navigation to be a high priority update instead of a transition as it is based on user interaction. Note: in this PR it still uses `startTransition` as there's no way to handle the high priority update suspending which happens in case of missing data in the cache. We're working with the React team on a solution for this particular case.
### Layouts
Note: this section assumes you've read [The layouts RFC](https://nextjs.org/blog/layouts-rfc) and [React Server Components RFC](https://reactjs.org/blog/2020/12/21/data-fetching-with-react-server-components.html)
React Server Components rendering leverages the Flight streaming mechanism in React 18, this allows sending a serializable representation of the rendered React tree on the server to the browser, the client-side React can use this serialized representation to render components client-side without the JavaScript being sent to the browser. This is one of the building blocks of Server Components. This allows a bunch of interesting features but for now I'll keep it to how it affects layouts.
When you have a `app/dashboard/layout.js` and `app/dashboard/page.js` the page will render as children of the layout, when you add another page like `app/dashboard/integrations/page.js` that page falls under the dashboard layout as well. When client-side navigating the new router automatically figures out if the page you're navigating to can be a smaller render than the whole page, in this case `app/dashboard/page.js` and `app/dashboard/integrations/page.js` share the `app/dashboard/layout.js` so instead of rendering the whole page we render below the layout component, this means the layout itself does not get re-rendered, the layout's `getServerSideProps` would not be called, and the Flight response would only hold the result of `app/dashboard/integrations/page.js`, effectively giving you the smallest patch for the UI.
---
Note: the commits in this PR were mostly work in progress to ensure it wasn't lost along the way. The implementation was reworked a bunch of times to where it is now.
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Previously we use custom webpack alias for specific react versions for non server side node runtime aliases. This PR alias the entire folders of `react/` and `react-dom/` so that no more alias in next.config is required but only the nodejs require hook.
* Alias `react` and `react-dom` by default
* Use `react@experimental` to run server components integration test
* Drop with-react-17 test util, add `__NEXT_REACT_CHANNEL` as an env var for testing and development to specify the react channel is 17 or new experimental version
* Adds tests to ensure `eslint-plugin-next`'s available rules are properly exported and recommended rules are defined correctly.
* Condenses imports.
* Sets default recommended value.
* replace Object.hasOwn for node 14
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
In a previous PR (#37278), the dependencies for benchmarks were moved to a subdirectory.
This ensures the same is done for other packages using `rimraf` which means we can remove it from the root package.json
This allows configuring / overriding the default options of the `styled-components` swc transform and allows using the `css` prop support, which was already implemented, but not available.
Edit: made the CSS prop transform run before the display name, so it gets picked up by that and receives the (deterministic) name.
Relates to #30802
### What's in there?
This is a followup of https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/37695.
For the dev server to clean stacktraces, we're decorating errors caught during code evaluation (`getServerSideProps` or middleware).
However, when these errors are asynchronously raised, we can't decorate them before processing them, leading to this fallback logic:
bf7bf8217f/packages/next/server/dev/next-dev-server.ts (L775-L779)
Thanks to latest improvement of the edge-runtime in 1.1.0-beta.4, we can now catch unhandled rejection and uncaught exception, and decorate them.
### How to test?
Please reuse the existing tests who already covered these cases:
`pnpm testheadless --testPathPattern middleware-dev-errors`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
* Refactor data fetching to support getting headers
* Relax `getNextPathnameInfo` type
* Add test for middleware internal redirects
* Export `ParsedRelativeUrl` type
* Refactor `getMiddlewareEffects`
* Move rewrite i18n test to middleware rewrite tests
* Fix bug parsing pathname info
* Normalize data requests to page requests for middleware
* Ensure there is a header `x-nextjs-matched-path` for middleware rewrites on data requests
* Extract `getDataHref` to a function
* Stop using `getDataHref` for flight
* Always set the query in `dataHref` independently of if it is SSG
* Add test for recursive rewrites
* Refactor dynamicPath validation to `matchHrefAndAsPath`
* Add `dataHref` to `FetchDataOutput`
* Extract `matchesMiddleware` function
* Add `hasMiddleware` option to `fetchNextData`
* Move preflight test
* Remove preflight test
* Add middleware prefetch tests
* Remove preflight
* Attempt to reduce bundle size
Include `withMiddlewareEffects` and `matchHrefAndAsPath` into `router`
Bring `getDataHref` back to `page-loader`
Bring `resolveDynamicRoute` back to `router`
* Reduce arg duplication for `withMiddlewareEffects`
* Remove some async/await and spreads to reduce bundle size
* Upgrade `edge-runtime` & clone `Request` on redirects to mutate headers
* Add some rewrite tests
Co-authored-by: Kiko Beats <josefrancisco.verdu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
* test: upgrade playwright-chromium from 1.14.1 to 1.22.2
This is a prereq for #36490 because the Events Timing API
used to measure Interaction to Next Paint (INP, experiemental web vital)
is only available in Chromium >= v98.
* update test
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This PR introduces [Edge Runtime](https://edge-runtime.vercel.app/) for emulating [Edge Functions](https://vercel.com/features/edge-functions) locally.
Every time you run a [middleware](https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/middleware) locally via `next dev`, an isolated edge runtime context will be created.
These contexts have the same constraints as production servers, plus they don't pollute the global scope; Instead, all the code run in a vm on top of a Node.js process.
Additionally, `@edge-runtime/jest-environment` has been added to make easier testing Edge Functions in a programmatic way.
It dropped the following polyfills from Next.js codebase, since they are now part of Edge Runtime:
- abort-controller
- formdata
- uuid
- web-crypto
- web-streams
Co-authored-by: Gal Schlezinger <2054772+Schniz@users.noreply.github.com>
Although it’s not intended for use in TypeScript, TypeScript still offers some nice features when it’s used in next.config.js (completion, hovers, `"checkJs": true`).
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Linked to issue #32209.
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation
There is one tsec violation that is fixed in this PR:
### 1. ban-script-src-assignment: route-loader.ts
XSS can occur with the line script.src = src in appendScript(src, script) if src can be controlled by a malicious user. From tracing through the code, it was determined that src comes from the function `getFilesForRoute(route)`. The behaviour of this function differs depending on the environment (development vs. production), but in both cases the function will construct strings that lead to valid file paths. These strings depend on two variables: `assetPrefix` and `route`, but due to the nature of the constructed strings it was determined that the scripts here are safe to use. Thus, the solution was to promote these strings to `TrustedScriptURL`s. This is the Trusted Types way of declaring that the script URL passed to the DOM sink is safe from DOM XSS attacks.
To create a `TrustedScriptURL`, a policy needs to be created. This policy was put in its own file: `client/trusted-types.ts`. This policy has the name `nextjs`. If this name should be changed to something else, feel free to change it now. However, once it is released to the public and application developers begin using it, it may be harder to change the value since any application developers with a custom policy name allowlist would now need to update their `next.config.js` headers to allow this new name.
The code was tested in a sample application to ensure it behaved as expected.
This updates our `yarn next` command to leverage react v18 by default and removes the need for the test require hook/config modifying when testing react 18. There are some fixtures we need to investigate react 18 support in follow-ups:
- `test/integration/client-navigation-a11y`
- `test/integration/critical-css`
- `test/integration/custom-error-page-exception`
- `test/integration/font-optimization`
- AMP specific tests
- Updates the React 18 test suite to the latest React version.
- Upgrade `react-refresh` module
Fixes#35518Fixes#35703
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
### Changes
* Remove top-level suspense boundary
* Pipe stream resolved from returned promimse of `renderToReadableStream`
* Remove jsx-runtime alias hack
### Test Changes
Since top level suspense boundary is removed, now content are filled in 1st SSR
## Bug
- [x] Fixes#33809
- [x] Related to #33218
- [x] Integration tests added: Usage of [html-validator](https://www.npmjs.com/package/html-validator) to validate the HTML.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md` (N/A)
In PR #26968, we added Set of loaded images that was removed in #33474 erroneously.
We still need to track loaded images since we can't rely on `img.complete`, especially if the parent uses `react-virtualized`.
Tested on https://nextjs.org/showcase
## Feature
Implements feature requested in https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/30805.
A few people including myself have been looking to use Relay with Next.JS and want to use the new Rust Compiler. This is my stab at an implementation.
### How it works?
Finds all `graphql` tagged template experssions and replaces them with `require`s to the file generated by Relay.
### Where I need help
- I've only worked with Rust a handful of times so I would appreciate any feedback on my use of language features.
- Is there any performance overhead to many duplicate usages of `require`? I imagine there's a cache in place but I want to be sure.
- I've added some unit tests & integration tests but I might be missing some use cases. Feel free to comment some use cases I'm not thinking about.
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- I haven't added any docs since this is an experimental API.
## Documentation / Examples
You're expected to be running the Relay Compiler along side Next.JS when you're developing. This is pretty standard. I wouldn't expect people to have any problem with this.
### Usage
In your `next.config.js`
```js
module.exports = {
experimental: {
relay: {
language: 'typescript', // or 'javascript`
artifactDirectory: 'path/to/you/artifact/directory' // you can leave this undefined if you did not specify one in the `relay.json`
}
}
}
```
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <6324199+timneutkens@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes#33462
Tried upgrading to v3, but we rely on the `timeout` property:
e5dee17f77/packages/next/telemetry/post-payload.ts (L12)
Which was removed since it's non-standard:
https://github.com/node-fetch/node-fetch/blob/main/docs/v3-UPGRADE-GUIDE.md#the-timeout-option-was-removed
I wanted to keep this PR minimal, so I did not try to work around the above.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
* Fix build-native jobs
* Update to latest turbo
* fix extra space
* fix windows shell
* Update to latest turbo
* Bump Turbo (#32703)
* Bump turbo to canary
* Bump turbo
* Update yaml too
* add less specific restore key
* update more restore keys
* Fix non-unique key and cache wasm build
* ensure turbo is installed for new jobs
* remove old wasm cache
* update directory check
* bump
* re-add if publish checks
Co-authored-by: Jared Palmer <jared@jaredpalmer.com>
This PR adds a new command to the `next` CLI.
Running `next info` will print useful information to the terminal about how/where Next.js is run. This information can be added to the Bug report when opening an issue in the repository.
This makes reporting issues more accurate and doesn't require the user to guess certain details, the command will retrieve it on their behalf.
Example output:
```sh
$ npx --no-install next info
Operating System:
Platform: linux
Version: #22-Ubuntu SMP Fri Nov 5 13:21:36 UTC 2021
Binaries:
Node: 16.13.0
npm: 8.1.0
Yarn: 1.22.17
pnpm: 6.24.2
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.8-canary.14
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
```
The idea is based on #32858
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Co-authored-by: Steven <229881+styfle@users.noreply.github.com>
* Move resolve-url-loader into Next.js
Fixes#32157
Moves resolve-url-loader into Next.js and strips out all features that are not used like `rework` support. Will reduce install size as well as allow for optimizing the approach in the near future.
* Update precompiled
* Use loader-utils 2
* Update trace test
* Revert "Update trace test"
This reverts commit 7c09a07871cc0ab72d5fcd4151a2d8efbc1aad8f.
* Add es5-ext as it's used in trace tests
* Update join-function.js
* Update bundle5.js
Implements Turborepo for the Next.js repository and leverage it for native build caching.
Co-authored-by: Maia Teegarden <2865858+padmaia@users.noreply.github.com>
Removes `yarn test` from the scripts as it has the wrong options. `yarn testonly` or `yarn testheadless` are the way to run tests. Fixes#32031
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
## Bug
Fixes#31892
react 18: requires camelcase for those props
```
Warning: Invalid DOM property `imagesrcset`. Did you mean `imageSrcSet`
```
react 17: requires lowercase for those props
```
Warning: React does not recognize the `imageSrcSet` prop on a DOM element.
```
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
### Utils
* Add command `yarn next-react-18 test/integration/any-react-18-app/`
* Add util `withReact18`
```js
const withReact18 = require('../../react-18/test/with-react-18')
module.exports = withReact18({
experimental: {
concurrentFeatures: true,
},
})
```
Generally, AVIF quality can be lower compared to WebP so we can adjust this for the user so that it looks roughly the same depending on if the browser supports AVIF or WebP.
- Fixes#31254
- Related to https://github.com/lovell/sharp/issues/2850
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Related to: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/30802
Ensuring that our tests are not broken with latest React changes.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
* Remove prebuilt binaries from repo
* Prefer locally built binary
* Add binary packages as optionalDependencies
* Remove build-native workflow for prebuilt binaries
* Remove binaries from checkCompiled job
* Change build-native command to default to dev
* Add build-native-dev and have tests depend on it
* Update contributing
* Run ls to make inspect artifact download
* Use correct artifact download path
* Try using reusable workflows
* Resort to duplication for now
* Inspect artifact download
* Ensure native is copied for PR stats
* Copy after ref checkout and log binaries for PR stats
* fix typo
* copy right before linking/packing
* Use fs.copy
* fix test for now
Co-authored-by: jj@jjsweb.site <jj@jjsweb.site>
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
I updated rust dependencies and node dependencies.
* Use recommended pattern in testing example
Since the official linter for testing library, `eslint-plugin-testing-library` recommends using `screen` to write queries, this MR updates the testing library example to follow the pattern recommended by the linter.
> DOM Testing Library (and other Testing Library frameworks built on top of it) exports a screen object which has every query (and a debug method). This works better with autocomplete and makes each test a little simpler to write and maintain.
> This rule aims to force writing tests using built-in queries directly from screen object rather than destructuring them from render result. Given the screen component does not expose utility methods such as rerender() or the container property, it is correct to use the render returned value in those scenarios.
See the `prefer-screen-queries` rules docs for more info: https://github.com/testing-library/eslint-plugin-testing-library/blob/main/docs/rules/prefer-screen-queries.md
* Update devDependencies
* Install and configure test linting
* Use recommended pattern in test
* Update test names for consistency
* Update docs
* Set jest environment in each file
* Use root true in `with-jest` eslint config
* Ensure nested .eslintrcs are not loaded for repo lint
Co-authored-by: jj@jjsweb.site <jj@jjsweb.site>
* Move unit tests to one folder
* Migrate unit tests to TypeScript
* add test types to lint
* Ensure ts(x) tests are run with util
* Add tsx extension to jest config
* bump
This updates our `jest` configuration to no longer use `babel-jest` and instead uses `@swc/jest` which is much faster. This also updates to the latest version of `jest`, fixes our `tsconfig.json` used for tests (previously types in `node_modules` weren't resolved correctly), and ensures `next/dist` isn't un-necessarily transpiled in `jest`.
Timings for `yarn testheadless test/unit/` on CI
- before: 3m 30s - 4m ([example run](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/runs/3394701995))
- after: under 1m ([example run](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/28400/checks?check_run_id=3395161621))
Timings for `yarn testheadless test/unit/` locally on m1 mac
- before: 90.16 seconds
- after: 29.92 seconds
