The [correct](https://www.grammarly.com/blog/et-cetera-etc/) way to use et cetera is to put a period right after and a comma behind it if it's being used as a list. I updated the occurrences in the docs and examples that didn't match these rules.
* Changed data fetching file name to overview to fix meta data title
* Update docs/api-reference/data-fetching/get-server-side-props.md
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
* Update manifest and check
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
This PR updates the Learn path in the getting started and from Create React App docs.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
This updates the incremental migration doc to mention the new fallback rewrites over the previous no-op rewrite behavior. This also mentions the version the new rewrites modes were added to the rewrites doc.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
Under the Single-Page App (SPA) heading, there is a code snipped which has a missing import:
import { useState } from 'react'
to
import { useState, useEffect } from 'react'
Also added apostrophe to description:
your old application entry point
to
your old application's entry point
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
## Documentation / Examples
- [X] Make sure the linting passes
Building off the "Migrating to Next.js" section started, this doc provides information on using `rewrites`, `redirects`, and micro-frontends to incrementally adopt Next.js in your codebase.
Noticed there's an extra backslash in the example which causes an error.
**EDIT:**
Also the promise needs to be resolved using `.toString()` before it can be returned as `content` in props.
