Fixes#38533 by including `src/` as a default linting directory where all files within are linted
## Bug
- [X] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [X] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Add [bundlejs](https://bundlejs.com/) site - an online tool to quickly bundle & minify your projects, while viewing the compressed gzip/brotli bundle size, all running locally on your browser.
The lowercase name is intentional.
This PR outlines the built-in features of Next.js that help make your application accessible, and will also include some resources for testing/improving accessibility in your app.
Related: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/20428
Ref: #38461, #37346
As [introduced](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/37177/files#diff-7ec7f47987bd890b5b47f6cf101398cd22fa37f874348d70036f85309a040c92
) in #37177, we statically analyze the `matcher` values, so we should make it clear.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR adds a missing closing curly bracket in the compiler option example of the [Styled Components](https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/compiler#styled-components).
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [X] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Updated docs to reflect that
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Lee Robinson <9113740+leerob@users.noreply.github.com>
I've wasted a couple of hours trying to work out why my static build wasn't passing through the props automatically as the docs say it should
Turns out it's the default app doing that and a custom app has to manually passed the props through
It wasn't obvious to me to look in the custom app doc where it's mentioned, so I've added a small note to the `getStaticProps` doc about this that points to the custom app doc
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
According to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/30802 SWC transforms for `styled-components` were updated with support for `cssProp`, `fileName` and `namespace`. The docs only mention support for `ssr` and `displayName`.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <18369201+balazsorban44@users.noreply.github.com>
## Documentation / Examples
- [X] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [X] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
## The Issue
When it came to testing environment variables with jest in the current release of NextJS, I ran into an issue where my variables were seemingly undefined for no reason. With some research and the help from a friend in discussion post #38353 it was determined further configuration steps were needed in relation to the environment variables for jest. At the time being, no direct link is made between [Setting up Jest](https://nextjs.org/docs/testing#setting-up-jest-with-the-rust-compiler) and [Test Environment Variables](https://nextjs.org/docs/basic-features/environment-variables#test-environment-variables).
## The Change
This fix provides further clarification on the issue by creating a new link within the note on the [Setting up Jest](https://nextjs.org/docs/basic-features/environment-variables#test-environment-variables) page. Moreover, further explanations were added to ensure developers understand the `test` environment is completely separate from both `development` and `production` meaning files like `.env.development` and `env.prodution` won't be recognized when testing.
## Supporting Documentation
This is an issue time and time again for developers. Not only have I experienced this, but others have asked on both [GitHub Discussions](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/16270) and [StackOverflow](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63934104/environment-variables-undefined-in-nextjs-when-running-jest/67997819#67997819). Moreover, many of the solutions from 2020 no longer work properly.
I hope this is sufficient enough for a contribution to the documentation. Minor improvements like these create the ideal developer experience Next.js is known for. :)
Co-authored-by: Lee Robinson <9113740+leerob@users.noreply.github.com>
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
[Slack thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C02UJ0QH45Q/p1656580818197009)
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
According to the 12.2 release note and the source code, the `next/future/image` does not use `IntersectionObserver` anymore so the `lazyRoot` prop is also not used.
The example probably got left behind unintentionally.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [X] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
AFAIK router.query will still be an empty object during prerendering if you have `getStaticProps`. It will be its "correct" value during prerendering if you're using `getServerSideProps` so this change seems to more accurately describe `router.query`
Readds `@next/next/no-assign-module-variable` ESLint rule that was inadvertently removed in #34335 during the resolution of many merge conflicts.
This PR will get us back to a good / working state. I'll see if I can add a test to ensure all rule are accounted for in a separate PR.
Fixes#34335.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Fixes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/37741. Allows `next/script` to be placed inside of `_document` body in addition to `Head`.
## Bug
- [X] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [X] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
This rule was good and kinda made sense when we had nested Middleware.
Now that we have a single Middleware, one might extract logic into different places
and I don't think we should limit importing `NextResponse` or `NextRequest`.
## Related
- Closes#36239
- Closes#37309
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
This PR fixes flaky `onLoad()` test for `next/image/future`.
The test must modify the `src` after hydration to make sure it always works as expected.
This is because `next/image/future` uses native lazy loading and sometimes the event fires before hydration (docs were updated to mention this)
This PR introduces a new experimental component, `next/future/image`, which is inspired by the existing experimental `layout="raw"`.
The difference is that much of the code has been deleted in order to reduce client-side code as well as reduce complexity:
- No `layout` prop
- No `loader` config (although `loader` prop works)
- No `IntersectionObserver`, use native `loading="lazy"`
- No `lazyBoundary`
- No `lazyRoot`
- No `fill` (yet) so width & height are required
- No `objectFit` (use `style` instead)
- No `objectPosition` (use `style` instead)
This improves performance because native `loading="lazy"` doesn't need to wait for React Hydration and client-side JS.
In a future PR, we will modify `next/image` to remove `layout="raw"` since this new component supersedes it.
## Feature
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [x] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Follow-up to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/37902 this moves the reference to avoid a change in `next-env.d.ts`. Also updates our doc note on the `next-env.d.ts` file to be more explicit about it being ignored.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This allows configuring / overriding the default options of the `styled-components` swc transform and allows using the `css` prop support, which was already implemented, but not available.
Edit: made the CSS prop transform run before the display name, so it gets picked up by that and receives the (deterministic) name.
Relates to #30802
This adds a new example under `cms-plasmic/`. It serves as a general-purpose example that should be able to work with any Plasmic project, which can be set via environment variables.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This PR adds a new section for the `userAgent` helper in `next/server`.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
