Upgrade devdependecy commander to latest versio.
Now in command, the optional argument is with [] and the required
argument is with <>.
---------
Co-authored-by: torresgol10.itd <torresgol10.itd@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sam Ko <sam@vercel.com>
### Why?
The current wording leaves room for questions/misinterpretations like:
- What does "use `src/`" mean? Does this affect my build, like compile
`src/*.ts` to `lib/*.js`?
- Oh, I can customize import aliases to use @ for project root instead
of doing relative everywhere? I'll choose Yes!
I think the proposed wording clarifies ^
---------
Co-authored-by: Sam Ko <sam@vercel.com>
This PR addresses an issue where the `dev` script in `package.json` was
not correctly updated to use the `--turbo` option when specified. The
changes ensure that the `dev` script is set to `next dev --turbo` if the
`turbo` option is enabled.
### Changes:
1. **Function Modification**:
- Updated the `modifyPackageJson` function to include a check for the
`turbo` parameter.
- If `turbo` is true, the `dev` script in `package.json` is set to `next
dev --turbo`.
- If `turbo` is false, the `dev` script remains `next dev`.
2. **Integration in App Creation**:
- Integrated the `modifyPackageJson` function into the app creation
process to ensure the `dev` script is correctly set based on the `turbo`
parameter.
### Testing:
- Verified that the `dev` script in `package.json` is correctly updated
to `next dev --turbo` when the `turbo` option is enabled.
- Ensured that the `dev` script remains `next dev` when the `turbo`
option is not enabled.
### Related Issues:
- Fixes#65924
### Notes:
- This change ensures that developers opting to use Turbopack for
development will have the correct script set up automatically.
---------
Signed-off-by: Arindam Majumder <arindammajumder2020@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lee Robinson <me@leerob.io>
Co-authored-by: devjiwonchoi <devjiwonchoi@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <inbox@huozhi.im>
Co-authored-by: Sam Ko <sam@vercel.com>
## Why?
Adding an `--empty` flag so we can easily create an empty Create Next
App template.
Closes NEXT-3367
---------
Co-authored-by: Ahmed Abdelbaset <A7med3bdulBaset@gmail.com>
This change allows disabling automatic `npm install`(or other supported
package managers).
Installing NextJS dependencies takes a long time and results in 0.5GB on
disk inside `node_modules`, it's not always what you want as sometimes
it's useful to delay dependency installation to a later time.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Fixes#63854
Previously, there was no check when a path was passed with the
--import-alias flag. Furthermore, the regex used before did not check
for possible invalid paths.
The current regex checks the following conditions:
- It must follow the pattern `<prefix>/*`
- The prefix cannot contain invalid characters for folders, such as:
(whitespaces, /, <, >, :, ", /, \, |, ? and *)
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
### What?
The [create-next-app
documentation](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/create-next-app#non-interactive)
under API reference says that;
> Further, you can negate default options by prefixing them with --no-
(e.g., --no-eslint).
When I tried to use --no-import-alias, I thought that it would
automatically use the default alias (@/*), but it does not.
### Why?
Each option has --no prefix control but import-alias has no --no prefix
control to give default value to program.
In an [Interactive](https://nextjs.org/#interactive) approach, the user
can select a prompt; `Would you like to customize the default import
alias (@/*)? No / Yes.` If the user selects no, then the default alias
is applied with @/*.
### How?
Implementing a condition solve the problem for general purpose. If
arguments includes `--no-import-alias` then the importAlias section
automatically apply the default value.
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
The PR further reduces the `create-next-app` installation size by
another 80 KiB:
- Replace the callback version of Node.js built-in `dns` API usage with
`dns/promise` + async/await
- Replace `got` w/ `fetch` since Next.js and `create-next-app` now
target Node.js 18.17.0+
- Download and extract the tar.gz file in the memory (without creating
temporary files). This improves the performance.
- Some other minor refinements.
Following these changes, the size of `dist/index.js` is now 536 KiB.
Had some spare time and was trying to get more familiar with the
codebase.
Added a few types to `create-next-app` here. Nothing fancy!
---------
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
### Why?
Whenever I run `create-next-app` and reach this question
```
Would you like to customize the default import alias? No / Yes
```
I always have to select "No", because I don't remember what this default import alias here is. [It _is_ documented to be `@/*`](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/create-next-app#non-interactive), but the documentation is relatively hidden and not many people know about it – it's also easy to forget.
Even more confusingly, the next question ("What import alias would you like configured?") doesn't have this `@/*` as the default answer, but the user's last choice as the default answer instead (which could be different from `@/*` – making people wonder if Next.js changed their defaults overnight).
I suppose it would be better to just make it clear in the prompt itself, so people with skill issues who happen to forget that default value (like me) can still confidently select "Yes" if they want `@/*`, without having to do "No" and manually type `@/*` again.
### How
```diff
- Would you like to customize the default import alias?
+ Would you like to customize the default import alias (@/*)?
```
Since the default for `create-next-app` has been TypeScript for some time, we should make sure this is also the case for CI.
This PR also makes sure that CI will use the same value as if the question was asked. Therefore changing defaults in the future will automatically change the behavior of CI defaults.
- Related https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/42592
This adds support for `--use-bun` to `create-next-app` to use `bun
install` when bootstrapping a new project.
```
npx create-next-app --use-bun
```
As with Yarn and pnpm, it reads from `npm_config_user_agent` to
determine if the user ran `bunx create-next-app`. If so, it defaults to
using Bun.
```sh
bunx create-next-app
```
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- [x] Run `pnpm prettier-fix`
- [x] `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [x] Added test to
`test/integration/create-next-app/package-manager.test.ts`
---------
Follows #53115
- Replace `chalk` with `picocolors`
- Note that `chalk.hex('#007acc')` has been replaced with `picocolors.blue`
- Replace `glob` with `fast-glob@2.2.7`
- Not only does `fast-glob` is a faster drop-in replacement of `glob` with first-party `Promise`-based API support, but also `fast-glob` is already a dependency of `cpy`:
<img width="812" alt="image" src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/40715044/8efa24c4-5312-4b1c-bf8d-68255ca30b60">
Together the PR removes about `50 KiB` from the `create-next-app/dist/index.js`:
<img width="570" alt="image" src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/40715044/db2f3723-14cc-48ce-9cb2-8aa1fb1d5e95">
Co-authored-by: Steven <229881+styfle@users.noreply.github.com>
### What?
This PR introduces a new `--tailwind` flag to the `create-next-app` CLI,
to make it easier to bootstrap a Next.js app with Tailwind CSS
pre-configured. This is going to be the **default**. To opt-out of
Tailwind CSS, you can use the `--no-tailwind` flag.
### Why?
Tailwind CSS is one of the most popular styling solutions right now, and
we would like to make it easier to get started.
Currently, the closest you can come to this is by running `pnpm create
next-app -e with-tailwindcss` which will clone the
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/tree/canary/examples/with-tailwindcss
example. But that example is not configured for the App Router. This PR
will let you add Tailwind CSS to both `app/`, `pages/`, and start out
with TypeScript or JavaScript via the CLI prompts.
(Some community feedback
https://twitter.com/dev_jonaskaas/status/1632367991827443713,
https://twitter.com/samselikoff/status/1634662473331617794)
### How?
We are adding 4 new templates to the CLI bundle.
> Note: The styling is not pixel-perfect compared to the current
templates (using CSS modules) to require fewer overrides, but I tried to
match it as close as possible. Here are a few screenshots:
<details>
<summary><b>Current, light</b></summary>
<img
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18369201/224733372-9dba86fe-9191-471d-ad9f-ab904c47f544.png"/>
</details>
<details>
<summary><b>Tailwind (new), light</b></summary>
<img
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18369201/224733610-038d9d0f-634d-4b69-b5c2-a5056b56760c.png"/>
</details>
<details>
<summary><b>Current, dark, responsive</b></summary>
<img
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18369201/224733790-9b4d730c-0336-4dbe-bc10-1cae1d7fd145.png"/>
</details>
<details>
<summary><b>Tailwind (new), dark, responsive</b></summary>
<img
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18369201/224734375-28384bbc-2c3a-4125-8f29-c102f3b7aa1d.png"/>
</details>
#### For reviewers
This introduces 4 new templates, with a very similar code base to the
original ones. To keep the PR focused, I decided to copy over duplicate
code, but we could potentially create a shared folder for files that are
the same across templates to somewhat reduce the CLI size. Not sure if
it's worth it, let me know. Probably fine for now, but something to
consider if we are adding more permutations in the future.
---
~Work remaining:~
- [x] app+ts
- [x] layout
- [x] dark mode
- [x] media queries
- [x] animations
- [x] app+js
- [x] pages+ts
- [x] pages+js
- [x] prompt/config
- [x] deprecate Tailwind CSS example in favor of CLI
- [x] update docs
- [x] add test
- [x] add [Prettier
plugin](https://github.com/tailwindlabs/prettier-plugin-tailwindcss)
Closes NEXT-772
Related #45814, #44286
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/42592
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
This ensures we continue to default to ESLint be configured for new
projects so that our lint checks are enabled for new projects.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Following up https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/42012 this adds an
additional prompt for include ESLint config/dependencies or not. As
discussed, this also removes the slow down from doing separate
`dependencies` and `devDependencies` installs since this separation is
no longer required now that we have `output: 'standalone'` which ensures
only actual necessary dependency files are used for production builds.
<details>
<summary>Before</summary>
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22380829/198953290-116b422d-4359-4aa9-9d82-b3265fde7b3f.mp4
</details>
<details>
<summary>After</summary>
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22380829/198953347-20dbf897-92b3-45ea-a9d2-cfb61622251d.mp4
</details>
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Resubmitting this PR following this comment from Tim. This work has been done already and we can build off of it to get this in faster.
> Just to be clear we're planning to rework create-next-app to give you the option to choose between JavaScript or TypeScript so it'll solve this request. For `app` right now it'll stay TypeScript till that is implemented.
>
> _Originally posted by @timneutkens in https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/41745#discussioncomment-3985833_
---
I added the `--ts, --typescript` flag to `create-next-app` in https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/24655, and since then I have seen it used very frequently, including in recent issues (such as https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33314) and most Next.js tutorials on YouTube. I noticed the template logic added in this PR was also used to add the `appDir` configuration as well.
We discussed a while ago adding the following user flow:
- `create-next-app --js, --javascript` creates a JS project
- `create-next-app --ts, --typescript` creates a TS project
- `create-next-app [name]` (no `--js, --ts`) prompts the user to choose either JS or TS, with TS selected by default.
### Review
Adding support for appDir and refactoring the templates brought the pain-of-review up a bit, but it's not so bad when broken into increments.
The original 8-file diff is here:
1f47d9b0bf
And the PR that brought the diff up to 59 files (mostly owed to `app` template dirs and file structure refactors):
bd3ae4afd3 ([PR link](https://github.com/ctjlewis/next.js/pull/3/files))
### Demo
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1657236/198586216-4691ff4c-48d4-4c6c-b7c1-705c38dd0194.mov
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Adds a new template for `app/` via `--experimental-app` flag.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Gracefully parse the environment package manager when calling
`create-next-app` instead of passing extra arguments.
Reference: #41090
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
* Merge multiple log statements
It is inefficient to use multiple console.log satements, and if something is logged to the console in the middle of execution, it will be in the center of the text, making it hard to read.
This pull request merges multiple console.logs into one.
In addition, it reduces the bundle size.
* ensure formatting matches
* update test
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This fixes our package manager detection which was changed slightly in https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/34947 for `pnpm` support to ensure the default case still attempts detecting the available package manager if no preference is specified in the command args. This also adds a test case to ensure the install succeeds when we fail to detect a valid `yarn` binary and no preference is set via the `npm_config_user_agent` env variable.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/35607
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/35599
* feat: support `pnpm` with `create-next-app`
* test: add `--use-pnpm` tests
* docs: mention `--use-pnpm` flag in docs
* test: remove `only`
* Update test/integration/create-next-app/index.test.ts
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
* chore: add pnpm action setup to tests
* chore: use latest pnpm
* chore: debug
* chore: debug
* fix: fall back to `yarn` instead of `npm`
* test: run all tests
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Add description for `--use-npm` flag that shows up as part of the help information.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
If a user does not specify `--example` when using create-next-app then just spin up the default template and only prompt them for the name of their project.
if a user does specify `--example` (with no string after it) then show them the example picker.
Closes#13960
Was going through _document and noticed some variable shadowing going on. Added a rule for it to our eslint configuration and went through all warnings with @Timer.
fix#12136
I add a prompt if there is an error when trying to download example files.
Maybe could be better to add an error class and in create-app.ts on every "console.error" trow a new Exception and manage it in catch. What you think ? 👯
This addresses #11910 in which `-e default` was not working because there was no example with the name `default`. This PR checks if a user inputted `default` as the example argument for `create-next-app` and if so it will use the local `default` template in the create-next-app directory.
Closes#11910
* Confirm if user wants example when creating app
* Only ask user to choose example if they provide --example flag
* Simplify the search
* Added test
* Use a select to pick the template
* Updated test
* check for lowercase and updated no example message
* Add message if no template is selected
* Updated tests
* Handle error if fetching the examples fails
* Fixed tests
* Updated test timeout
* Update examples.ts
Co-authored-by: merelinguist <merelinguist@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Luis Alvarez <luis@zeit.co>
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
Co-authored-by: Joe Haddad <joe.haddad@zeit.co>
* Completely rewrite Create Next App
* Sort imports
* Show what package manager is being used
* Fix project name suggestion
* Update tests for new implementation
* Use normal prepublish command for on-install
* Upgrade Node version
* Switch to 8.16
* Disable v8 cache
* Swap out update check package and fix CLI boot
