`shake_exports` relies on `ecma_transforms_optimization`, otherwise this will be thrown if running tests:
```
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: could not find `optimization` in `transforms`
--> crates/core/src/shake_exports.rs:7:23
|
7 | ecma::transforms::optimization::simplify::dce::{dce, Config as DCEConfig},
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ could not find `optimization` in `transforms`
```
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
* Use require hook and alias to resolve styled-jsx
* re-export styled-jsx types from compiled
* fix lint
* add test for styled-jsx css
* setup require hook in server
* compile import path to styled-jsx/style
* revert require hook
* add test for server styled-jsx resolving
* update test
* pre copy styled-jsx assets
* fix styled-jsx dts
* add npmrc for styled-jsx e2e test
* load require hook directly
* rm legacy test
* fix lint
* fix pnpm install error
* split require hook
* only alias styled-jsx
* make styled-jsx resolving statically analyzable
* update test
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
fixes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/38291
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Otherwise build-native fails with "napi: command not found.".
Alternatively, this is missing from this package's devDependencies.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
P.S.: local copy fails `pnpm lint` due to the `target` subfolder with intermediate rust build artifacts... should I add a `.prettierignore` update to exclude `/packages/next-swc/target/`?
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
---
- Closes#38117
As we have disabled crash reporter for now, this PR removes feature from `default` to not to include it in `next-swc` as well. Feature itself remains so we can adjust it later by enabling it depends on the progress.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This is second attempt to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/38076 . Most of changes are identical to previous PR. Main difference is introducing features `native-tls` and `rustls` for the sentry's downstream feature. Few platform targets we build (mostly where we cross compiles) fails to find native openssl for the specified target. For those, we falls back to rustls instead. The only exception is aarch64_windows, neither openssl nor rustls can be compiled straightforwardly, For those platform we bail out and do not init sentry at all. There are nearly 0 users on aarch64_windows anyway. We could try to located target's openssl binary, but the effort required seems not worth enough.
Also PR changed `server_name` property to not to include real device hostname to avoid possible PII concerns.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This PR attempts to setup native crash reporter for `next-swc`. Currently, it uses sentry internally, but it is subject to change depending on the usecase & needs. In any case it won't be breaking changes since this is not transparent to the end users.
PR sets up basic, minimal setup to collect crash reports only at the moment. We may want to expand & collect more data in native next-swc, but it is not clear what we need to collect / and I believe most cases next.js's js context can collect those data via existing telemetry. Crash report is an exception native handler can perform much better by having it in native context directly. While this is sent to different endpoint than telemetry, it is considered as same opt-in configuration. If telemetry is disabled, crash reporter won't collect as well.
The information collected by the reporter is minimally configured by sentry's sdk. These are the informations collected for example:
- device arch / family / model
- os kernel version / name / version
- runtime (rust) version / channel
- sentry sdk
- panic backtrace
- next.js release version
- device host name
There's no per-system uuid configurations yet.
It may need some audit if we need to omit some data included in above, while most of them seems ok to me.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
