This adds new `build and test` and `build and deploy` workflows in favor
of the existing massive `build, test, and deploy` workflow. Since the
new workflows will use `pull_request_target` this waits to remove the
existing workflow until the new one is tested.
While testing this new workflow flakey behavior in tests have also been
addressed. Along with the new workflow we will also be leveraging new
runners which allow us to run tests against the production binary of
`next-swc` so this avoids slight differences in tests we've seen due to
running against the dev binary.
Furthermore we will have a new flow for allowing workflow runs on PRs
from external forks which will either require a comment be checking a
box approving the run after each change or a label added by the team.
The new flow also no longer relies on `actions/cache` or similar which
have proven to be pretty unreliable.
Tests runs with the new workflow can be seen here
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/actions/runs/5100673508/jobs/9169416949
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
### What?
WEB-1086.
This PR flips the way running next.js integration test with Turbopack,
instead of using allowlist to run selectively enabled test now uses
denylists. The immediate effect is now any new test being added (as a
new file) will be executed with Turbopack by default, and should be
manually excluded if it fails.
Still, the number of tests we run remains same.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
This PR adjusts manifests for the next.js test with Turbopack, as I
found upstream test keep changing and need to sync its latests state
into the manifest.
Manifest is now .js file contains 2 arrays, one for the enabled, and
others for the disabled. Disabled doesn't mean it's always failing
though.
### What?
Disable `tracing/release_max_level_info` for non-published release
builds. I modified CI script to strip out logging for published
binaries.
### Why?
x-ref: https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03EWR7LGEN/p1683621374204959
It's required to print logging for turbopack.
### How?
Closes WEB-1032
---------
Co-authored-by: Tobias Koppers <tobias.koppers@googlemail.com>
### What?
disable optimistic_updates
So it no longer does that:
> If Kodiak is merging an out-of-date pull request that has running
status checks, update the pull request's branch without waiting for the
running status checks to finish.
The problem with that is that it cancels running checks and restarts
them.
Instead it waits for all running status checks before updating the PR.
### Why?
This should avoid the case where a PR is updated again and again without
yielding a result.
It also saves some CI cost
And it allows CI to finish and fill up the turborepo cache, which can
potentially used for the next run.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
### What?
This PR changes to the `root` of the cargo workspace to the root of repo
itself, allows next-swc and other rust codebase can use repo root as
workspace root.
### Why?
Currently cargo manifest for the next-swc is not placed under the root
of the repo, which makes invocation to the tool requires to change cwd /
or set cwd. Similarly needs to open editor to the root of the cargo
manifest separately to able to utilize language server kicks in. Moving
manifest to the root consolidates those, so can invoke either cli / or
editor to the same root of the repo.
We decided in https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/48308 that we won't
use `turbo` when packing packages for tests.
This PR removes all code associated with that effort. The whole thing
fas behind a flag, so it shouldn't affect anything.
fix NEXT-1025
### What?
* move some shared runtime logic to turbopack
* use relative imports from internal code when possible
* move react-refresh logic to turbopack
* move benchmark code logic to turobpack
see https://github.com/vercel/turbo/pull/4553
### Why?
We want to have benchmarking again for turbopack PRs
We want to have a standalone turbopack cli (eventually)
We want to avoid duplicating the runtime code
### How?
refactoring, moving code
### What?
enables the benchmark tests from turbopack again
### Why?
It tests common scenarios like HMR
fixes WEB-792
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Kirszenberg <alex.kirszenberg@vercel.com>
### What?
Syncing https://github.com/vercel/next.js/labels with the bug report template.
### Why?
We've got some OS-related reports so it would be nice to be able to filter on that.
### How?
The label description is added as a select option to the template, which then matches one of the labels https://github.com/vercel/next.js/labels
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
- closes WEB-766.
This PR enables a new job for running tests, against turbopack. Since we
have observed some flakiness across turbopack test execution, it starts
from absolute minimum set of tests to not block any CI due to unexpected
failure.
Ran manual workflow roughly ~50 times and looks like these set of tests
are fine to make it as blocking check for the PR. In the future, depends
on the stability we'll increase number of test gradually.
### What?
Turbopack tests need to run on any change
### Why?
Next.js changes might break turbopack and we want to avoid that.
### How?
Change CI job
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This re-enables running the CNA tests for all non-docs changes as it's now ensuring we don't regress on turbopack or our default templates.
Also fixes the main repo's package.json files from being modified during tests.
This ensures we only honor cache entries from the in memory cache for up
to 2 seconds so that revalidates can correctly propagate and also
increases max fetch cache entry size to 2 MB. The `fetchCache` export is
also being detected in this PR but not yet honored which will be done in
a follow-up.
As discussed this adds a publish workflow that can be triggered for
canary or stable releases which ensures we are publishing from a
consistent environment and local config doesn't affect a release.
This ensures the build spinner is correctly stopped in a TTY environment
and also adds regression tests for `app` and `pages` to ensure this
behaves as expected.
This updates our docker image to use the `jammy` tag instead of `focal`
to match the Ubuntu version to our CI.
- Move span wrapping rendering closer to the user code and don't add
span when we have cache-hit
- Add `getStaticProps` span
- Add spans around API handlers (pages and app)
- Add `generateMetadata` span
- Clarify naming that we use `page` for entrypoints like
`/path/[param]/page` or `/path/[param]/layout`. And `route` for
`/path/[param]`
fix NEXT-857 ([link](https://linear.app/vercel/issue/NEXT-857))
### What?
A fork of https://github.com/github/issue-labeler that we pull in and
maintain.
### Why?
The official issue labeler had some issues which I tried to fix in PRs
and eventually got merged upstream, but the release cycle was a bit
slow, and that GitHub action had many parts we did not really need
anyway. So it makes sense to maintain it ourselves.
### How?
This PR removes the
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/.github/issue-labeler.yml
config file, which in our case is just a sublist of
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/labels anyway. Instead, we can pull in
the labels from GitHub directly and filter out those that we want to
apply to issues. This will keep things more in sync.
fix NEXT-750 ([link](https://linear.app/vercel/issue/NEXT-750))
---------
### What?
update prettier in the PR stats action
### Why?
It's outdated and can't parse syntax of the latest swc version (static
blocks)
### How?
update package.json
### What?
enables the next-dev-tests crate integration tests from trubopack
### Why?
to unblock the move PR we temporarily disabled the tests
### How?
Fix the new location and fix the expect dependency
Fixes WEB-708
---------
Co-authored-by: Justin Ridgewell <justin@ridgewell.name>
Hi everyone! Thank you for your work on this awesome framework 🙌
This short PR will add a short description on how to install the `canary` version of `next` to the `bug issue template`. It's only affecting this issue template and nothing else.
Closes#47080
Co-authored-by: Steven <229881+styfle@users.noreply.github.com>
Update workspace cargo deps
Update cargo deps to point to local workspace
Ignore too-many-arguments warnings
Fix clippy errors
Update pnpm workspaces
exclude integration tests from unit tests CI
rust-analyzer settings
add rust flags and env vars
## What?
This PR has its main goal to improve the experience of opening/reviewing
a PR.
It improves the PR template, as well as extends PR auto-labeling.
## Why?
There are 2 parts to the PR template:
- Individual contributors: The current template accommodates for the
most common cases individual contributors use to contribute. (I.e.
fixing bugs, updating/adding examples, addressing documentation issues).
The new template keeps this at the top.
- Next.js team: As maintainers, we should try to explain PRs as if
someone with less context would review them. This should also help with
backreferencing PRs in issues and follow-up PRs and make it easier to
follow changes, understand trade-offs better at the time, and help new
team members catch up over time, etc.
## How?
The template is written in a comment instead of Markdown, so when the PR
is opened, most of the template is hidden to make it less verbose.
The checkboxes we've had before are not shown, but we already auto-label
PRs based on the path of the files that have been touched, so the
checkboxes showed redundant information.
[Slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C04DUD7EB1B/p1677677802109289),
Closes NEXT-741
## What?
- Rendering `next info` output as code in the bug template
- Removed the "Feature Request" issue template, in favor of a more
granular discussion template
- Added a minimal template for Help discussions
## Why?
The main part of this PR is the new Feature Request template.
Anyone can propose a change to Next.js. However adding new features
often requires community discussions - whether to align expectations,
understand the consequences (eg.: backward compatibility/lifetime of a
feature), to look at and understand historical reasons for the current
behavior or lack of the feature -, which [GitHub
discussions](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions) is more
suited for than issues.
## How?
- Utilizing the new discussion templates
https://docs.github.com/en/discussions/managing-discussions-for-your-community/creating-discussion-category-forms
- Adding a link to the [new
issue](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/new/choose) view to make
it easier to discover
[Slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C04DUD7EB1B/p1670874727319809)
Closes NEXT-742
---------
We want to make sure that our examples are not breaking.
We don't want to be slowed down by broken 3rd party packages, but we
need to ensure that examples covering next.js features are always green.
Added as a standalone workflow that doesn't parallelize. It will just
run on a cron schedule, so we can check for current status. We can add
Slack ping later if we need to.
The workflow tests just that our examples can build, so mostly TS
issues. We could definitely follow up with actual tests, but that is not
as low-hanging.
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
This PR updates the Edge Runtime docs on the next.js docs site with
simplified tables for each API section
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This updates our CI testing flow to only run against LTS Node.js version
on PRs and then run against the maintenance Node.js version when cutting
a release. This will allow speeding up PR test runs to get feedback
faster and remove un-necessary duplicate testing as it's very rare a
change breaks the maintenance Node.js version but not the LTS version.
This PR ensures the tests for codemods will automatically run in CI when the source code changes.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Not all systems have `/bin/bash` (for example NixOS).
`/usr/bin/env bash` reads the location of bash from `PATH`
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
- reverted to github version because that works now
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
- [x] Depends on https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/45776
Turbotrace occupies too many memories while running; this PR makes it
run after the webpack build is finished, it can reduce the memory
hogging by webpack and turbotrace, thus avoiding OOM
The `maxFiles` option in turbotrace is removed because there is
`memoryLimit` option takes over its role.
Close WEB-556
Noticed while testing across CI environments that the `test-pack` handling is not-concurrent or cache safe so this removes it from being used by default and moves it behind a flag to allow further investigating later.
In CI if `test-pack` is called at the same time due to multiple concurrency it can cause the resulted archive to be corrupted so may require a form of lock to resolve in CI although locally re-using the same archive name/path isn't safe with pnpm as it won't bust the store cache and continue to leverage previous cache.
Creates a new workflow and action that auto labels with `linear` whenever we apply `kind: bug`.
It's using JS action instead of docker, so it should be quite fast.
I tested this on my fork and it works.
Also created the action with TS so we can use it as a starting point for next actions so they can all be typed.
This reverts commit fd9ec646ac.
It seems that there is an issue with caching of inputs which uses stale
files.
We also had to disable caching of `pnpm-lock.yaml` because it requires
stable package locations chich we removed.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
## Bug
Test(Production) CI fails with error
```
Package libicu66 is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
E: Package 'ttf-unifont' has no installation candidate
E: Package 'ttf-ubuntu-font-family' has no installation candidate
E: Unable to locate package libenchant1c2a
E: Package 'libicu66' has no installation candidate
E: Unable to locate package libvpx6
E: Unable to locate package libwebp6
Failed to install browser dependencies
```
This is due to new release for the runner image (https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/6399) now sets ubuntu 22.04 as latest, but playwright have release to support it (https://github.com/microsoft/playwright/issues/13738) but @replayio/playwright seems not picked it up yet (https://github.com/replayio/replay-cli/blob/main/packages/playwright/package.json#L23)
PR tries to pin to known working image (20.04) until dependencies can support new image gracefully.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
