Tim Neutkens
5be28886c3
Use unique names for separate test suites ( #56695 )
...
These two get reported under the same name which makes it harder to
distinguish in the dashboard.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas )
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs )
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
2023-10-11 14:42:12 +02:00
Tim Neutkens
cbe8238ebd
Skip production tests for Turbopack ( #56089 )
...
Follow-up to #56045 . Found there was a group of tests for production
called `server mode` instead of `production mode`, those are skipped too
now.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas )
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs )
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
2023-09-27 15:19:42 +02:00
Tim Neutkens
f260328900
BREAKING CHANGE: Enable newNextLinkBehavior ( #41459 )
...
- Enable newNextLinkBehavior. See #36436
- Run next/link codemod on test suite
Note that from when this lands on apps trying canary will need to run
the new-link codemod in order to upgrade.
Ideally we have to detect `<a>` while rendering the new link and warn
for it.
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
2022-10-17 21:20:28 -04:00
JJ Kasper
a92a5caec2
Update test set-up to leverage playwright when able to ( #28634 )
...
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-09-13 14:36:25 +02:00
Jan Potoms
2f50f1f8c9
Stabilize more tests ( #15470 )
...
jest retries seem to be masking test failures, like the `auto-export` one (and maybe others). I turned it off for now. The `auto-export` test fails when retries are turned off.
the output of this test failure was a bit unhelpful so I also improved it.
Many tests have anonymous page functions.
2020-07-26 04:57:06 +00:00
JJ Kasper
38bd1a024c
Re-enable scroll restoration behind flag ( #14046 )
...
This updates the scroll position saving to occur as the scroll position changes instead of trying to do it when the navigation is changing since the `popState` event doesn't allow us to update the leaving history state once the `popState` has occurred.
The order of events that was previously attempted to save scroll position on a `popState` event (back/forward navigation)
1. history.state is already updated with state from `popState`
2. we replace state with the currently rendered page adding scroll info
3. we replace state again with the `popState` event state overriding scroll info
Using this approach the above event order is no longer in conflict since we don't attempt to populate the state with scroll position while it's leaving the state and instead do it while it is still the active state in history
This approach resembles existing solutions:
https://www.npmjs.com/package/scroll-behavior
https://twitter.com/ryanflorence/status/1029121580855488512
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/13990
Fixes : #12530
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/14075
2020-07-06 14:27:45 +00:00
