Makes it easier to detect why a network error occurred with the CLI or `next info`, based on https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/36344
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
I noticed a few issues that had "Output from `next info`" with the first line as
```
/bin/sh: pnpm: command not found
```
This was because `execSync()` was still printing to stderr when a command was not found.
Changing to `execFileSync()` fixed it so we no longer print to stderr when a command is not found.
Ref: [Slack thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/CGU8HUTUH/p1645003443213449)
When opening a new issue, it is desired that the user has checked if the `canary` release not already have fixed their issue, since we do not backport fixes to previous Next.js versions.
- added a CLI warning when `next info` runs that looks like this:
This links to a message docs page with more information and some useful links.
- refactored our bug report templates to be more clear and removed the fields that are now unnecessary (since running `next info` is expected to run on releases that already have it)
- Made browser/deployment optional, as in most cases those fields are irrelevant. We still ask them, but mention that they are only needed if relevant.
- Asking for the exact browser version now
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
The [correct](https://www.grammarly.com/blog/et-cetera-etc/) way to use et cetera is to put a period right after and a comma behind it if it's being used as a list. I updated the occurrences in the docs and examples that didn't match these rules.
This PR adds a new command to the `next` CLI.
Running `next info` will print useful information to the terminal about how/where Next.js is run. This information can be added to the Bug report when opening an issue in the repository.
This makes reporting issues more accurate and doesn't require the user to guess certain details, the command will retrieve it on their behalf.
Example output:
```sh
$ npx --no-install next info
Operating System:
Platform: linux
Version: #22-Ubuntu SMP Fri Nov 5 13:21:36 UTC 2021
Binaries:
Node: 16.13.0
npm: 8.1.0
Yarn: 1.22.17
pnpm: 6.24.2
Relevant packages:
next: 12.0.8-canary.14
react: 17.0.2
react-dom: 17.0.2
```
The idea is based on #32858
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Co-authored-by: Steven <229881+styfle@users.noreply.github.com>
A middleware can work as a proxy intercepting requests and then performing a `fetch` to the destination adding headers to the request / response as a "man in the middle". When using `fetch` from a middleware we are not in the context of a browser so we can't really use relative URLs, they must be always absolute.
Now consider the previous case when middleware is running in *server mode*. Typically in order to know the host where we are fetching we can use the `request.nextUrl` which is given to the middleware but in this case the invoker (which is next-server) has no context of the hostname, nor the port. To solve this use case we must make the invoker of the middleware aware of the origin hostname and port.
This PR:
- Introduces `hostname` and `port` as options for `NextServer`.
- Refactors types in `NextServer` and `NextDevServer` moving type only imports to the top of the file.
- Refactors `startServer` to do a best guess on the `hostname` and `port`, passing them down.
- Exposes `.port` and `.hostname` to be retrieved from the `app`.
In an upcoming PR we will pass the host guess to the middleware to solve the relative URL issue.
* Automatically using different port to start dev server for non-explicit port
* return correct port
* more reasonable changes
* fix isExplicitPort
* 1. rename isExplicitPort to allowRetry 2.restrict the number of retries
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Fixes#31241
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
* fix: support --cache-strategy ESLint argument
* add integration tests for --cache-strategy
* fix: add cacheStrategy to eslintOptions
* minor adjustments in next lint help message for --cache-strategy
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
This PR improves the error message for the case that `fs` is being imported under `concurrentFeatures`. This is a common error, but the current console output isn't very clear about the cause.
The new output will be:
> Native Node.js APIs are not supported in the Edge Runtime with \`concurrentFeatures\` enabled. Found \`fs\` imported.
Related to #30424.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
This PR introduces an improved developer experience when `next lint` is run for the first time.
### Current behavior
`eslint-config-next` is a required package that must be installed before proceeding with `next lint` or `next build`:
Although this has helped many developers start using the new ESLint config, this has also resulted in a few issues:
- Users are required to install the full config (`eslint-config-next`) even if they do not use it or use the Next.js plugin directly (`eslint-plugin-next`).
- #26348
- There's some confusion on why `eslint-config-next` needs to be installed or how it should be used instead of `eslint-plugin-next`.
- #26574
- #26475
- #26438
### New behavior
Instead of enforcing `eslint-config-next` as a required package, this PR prompts the user by asking what config they would like to start. This happens when `next lint` is run for the first time **and** if no ESLint configuration is detected in the application.
<img src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12476932/124331177-e1668a80-db5c-11eb-8915-38d3dc20f5d4.gif" width="800" />
- The CLI will take care of installing `eslint` or `eslint-config-next` if either is not already installed
- Users now have the option to choose between a strict configuration (`next/core-web-vitals`) or just the base configuration (`next`)
- For users that decide to create their own ESLint configuration, or already have an existing one, **installing `eslint-config-next` will not be a requirement for `next lint` or `next build` to run**. A warning message will just show if the Next.js ESLint plugin is not detected in an ESLint config.
<img width="682" alt="Screen Shot 2021-06-25 at 3 02 12 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/12476932/123473329-6cc4a680-d5c6-11eb-9a57-d5c0b89a2732.png">
---
In addition, this PR also:
- Fixes#26348
- Updates documentation to make it more clear what approach to take for new and existing ESLint configurations
Attempt to fix#26393
~~Sorry, I wasn't able to run tests on local, but I hope at least test should be valid.~~
Edit: Tests are working correctly on my local :)
fixes#26393
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #26393`
- [x] Integration tests added
- Enables excludeDefaultMomentLocales by default
- Adds distDir cleaning (See RFC #6009)
- Adds support for `PORT`
- Removes `router.events` from the server-side router as it should not be used server-side (long-standing todo that is potentially breaking). Note that it's still available as `Router.events` (import Router from 'next/router') and with `useRouter` in `useEffect`. Using it with `useEffect` is the correct way and I've updated the upgrading guide to reflect that
- Added webpack 5 to the upgrading guide
- Removed `Head.rewind` as it's been a no-op since Next.js 9.5 and can now be safely removed from user code
Fixes#11408Fixes#10338Fixes#5554
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Adds an err.sh link to the production build missing message. Also clears up `valid` as `production`.
Also fixes an edge case where an unhelpful error would be thrown because we checked for `.next` instead of `.next/BUILD_ID`
Added the out directory location as the list line during export to make sure people know where the files are output.
Fixes#19778Fixes#19788
This upgrades to ncc@0.25.0 and fixes the previous bugs including:
* ncc not referenced correctly in build
* Babel type errors
* node-fetch, etag, chalk and raw-body dependencies not building with ncc - these have been "un-ncc'd" for now. As they are relatively small dependencies, this doesn't seem too much of an issue and we can follow up in the tracking ncc issue at https://github.com/vercel/ncc/issues/612.
* `yarn dev` issues
Took a lot of bisecting, but the overall diff isn't too bad here in the end.
Fixes#15928
---
This would cause us to print the message too early and open the browser to a server that wasn't started yet. This waits until we're listening, but before the app is ready fully.
Removed Option to enable `ReactProductionProfiling` from configuration and added a CLI switch for the same.
Users can now do `next build --profile` to enable react production profiling.
Also added a warning to notify users about the performance impact
Fixes: #14688
