Improvement to how the `app` and `pages` files conflict is shown.
Especially the last log line `"pages/" - "app/"` made it seem like you
should remove the `pages` folder altogether. This was a bug in how the
`''` case was displayed. After having a look at this I went further and
added exactly which file caused the conflict given that `app` allows you
to create `app/(home)/page.js` and such it saves some digging for what
the actual conflicting file is. Similarly in `pages` both
`pages/dashboard/index.js` and `pages/dashboard.js` are possible.
Before:
```
error - Conflicting app and page files were found, please remove the conflicting files to continue:
error - "pages/another" - "app/another"
error - "pages/hello" - "app/hello"
error - "pages/" - "app/"
```
After:
```
error - Conflicting app and page files were found, please remove the conflicting files to continue:
error - "pages/another.js" - "app/another/page.js"
error - "pages/index.js" - "app/page.js"
error - "pages/hello.js" - "app/hello/page.js"
```
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This ensures we continue to default to ESLint be configured for new
projects so that our lint checks are enabled for new projects.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
This PR implements a configuration option in `next.config.js` to support
for rust-based MDX compiler (https://github.com/wooorm/mdxjs-rs).
Currently it is marked as experimental, as mdx-rs and loader both may
need some iteration to fix regressions.
When a new experimental flag is set (`mdxRs: true`), instead of using
`@mdx/js` loader `next/mdx` loads a new webpack loader instead.
Internally, it mostly mimics mdx/js's loader behavior, however actual
compilation will be delegated into next/swc's binding to call mdx-rs's
compiler instead.
I choose to use next-swc to expose its binding function, as mdx-rs
internally uses swc already and creating new binary can double up
bytesize (with all the complex processes of publishing new package).
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Follow-up to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/42255
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This adapts the new client hooks of `usePathname`, `useSearchParams`,
and `useRouter` to work within the `pages/` directory to aid users
attempting to migrate shared components over to the `app/` directory.
> **Exception:**
> When the pages router is not ready, `useSearchParams` will return an
empty `URLSearchParams`. This mirrors the behavior seen in the `pages/`
directory today in that `router.query` is not available until the client
hydrates.
This also adds a new option for `useRouter` to bring it line with the
correct typings with the app directory. By default, calling
`useRouter()` will return the type `NextRouter | null` to represent what
you get when you call it from a component originating from the app
directory. If you want to instead force it to return `NextRouter` as it
does today, you can pass a boolean into the `useRouter` call as such:
```ts
const router = useRouter() // typeof router === NextRouter | null
const router = useRouter(true) // typeof router === NextRouter
```
This change is designed to ease the incremental adoption of app.
x-ref: [slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C02HEJASXGD/p1667173179573409?thread_ts=1667165920.338789&channel=C02HEJASXGD&message_ts=1667173179.573409)
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Following up https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/42012 this adds an
additional prompt for include ESLint config/dependencies or not. As
discussed, this also removes the slow down from doing separate
`dependencies` and `devDependencies` installs since this separation is
no longer required now that we have `output: 'standalone'` which ensures
only actual necessary dependency files are used for production builds.
<details>
<summary>Before</summary>
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22380829/198953290-116b422d-4359-4aa9-9d82-b3265fde7b3f.mp4
</details>
<details>
<summary>After</summary>
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22380829/198953347-20dbf897-92b3-45ea-a9d2-cfb61622251d.mp4
</details>
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Fixes#41856. There is no way to apply those loader rules to specific
directories, especially when `transpileModules` is used. This PR changes
that to be based on the issuer layer.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Resubmitting this PR following this comment from Tim. This work has been done already and we can build off of it to get this in faster.
> Just to be clear we're planning to rework create-next-app to give you the option to choose between JavaScript or TypeScript so it'll solve this request. For `app` right now it'll stay TypeScript till that is implemented.
>
> _Originally posted by @timneutkens in https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/41745#discussioncomment-3985833_
---
I added the `--ts, --typescript` flag to `create-next-app` in https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/24655, and since then I have seen it used very frequently, including in recent issues (such as https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33314) and most Next.js tutorials on YouTube. I noticed the template logic added in this PR was also used to add the `appDir` configuration as well.
We discussed a while ago adding the following user flow:
- `create-next-app --js, --javascript` creates a JS project
- `create-next-app --ts, --typescript` creates a TS project
- `create-next-app [name]` (no `--js, --ts`) prompts the user to choose either JS or TS, with TS selected by default.
### Review
Adding support for appDir and refactoring the templates brought the pain-of-review up a bit, but it's not so bad when broken into increments.
The original 8-file diff is here:
1f47d9b0bf
And the PR that brought the diff up to 59 files (mostly owed to `app` template dirs and file structure refactors):
bd3ae4afd3 ([PR link](https://github.com/ctjlewis/next.js/pull/3/files))
### Demo
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1657236/198586216-4691ff4c-48d4-4c6c-b7c1-705c38dd0194.mov
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Ensures we handle the `configFileName` field properly from
`next.config.js`.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
fixes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/42006
this issue occurred because images with `data url` src start with `blob`
and `data` will be mark as `unoptimized`, then its `sizes` will be
assigned with `undefined`.
I just skip the check for `data url` images, if there is any better
solution, we can have a discuss here.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [x] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Enable using multiple weights and styles in the same google font loader
call.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
This PR updates test fixture setup to pass `--turbo` when devserver is
initiated. Due to lot of existing tests are not working with turbopack
yet, changes are focused to setup necessary logics for the fixtures
only. With this change we can create some sort of burndown list to fix
forward.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Updating the average with using the string
"aaabcdeeeefghiijklmnnoopqrrssttuvwxyz "
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
-->
Co-authored-by: Hannes Bornö <hannes.borno@vercel.com>
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: Steven <229881+styfle@users.noreply.github.com>
Previously, creating the `app` dir without enabling the config would
print an error about `pages` missing:
> Couldn't find a `pages` directory. Please create one under the project
root
This PR prints a better error message:
> The `app` dir is experimental. Please add `{experimental:{appDir:
true}}` to your `next.config.js` to enable it
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
For `next/legacy/image`, the `data-nimg` has the `layout` prop value.
Since `next/image` doesn't have a `layout` prop, we can use `fill` when
the fill prop is used or fallback to `1`.
Next.js 13 will require React 18.
In this PR I've only updated the peerDependency and removed the test runs in GH actions. Further cleanup will follow later, this allows us to remove the code supporting it later.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR adds a new configure property, `images.loaderFile` that allow
you to define a path to a file with an exported image loader function.
This is useful when migrating from `next/legacy/image` to `next/image`
because it lets you configure the loader for every instance of
`next/image` once, similar to the legacy "built-in loaders".
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
-->
Updating size-adjust calc to use azAvgWidth instead of xAvgCharWidth
Co-authored-by: Hannes Bornö <hannes.borno@vercel.com>
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This PR fixes two bugs:
- Fixes#40419
- Fixes#41393
The first is when the aspect ratio of the `width` and `height` does not
match the aspect ratio of the `blurDataURL` provided. This can result in
artifacts around the edges. The solution is to add
`preserveAspectRatio="none"`.
The second is when there is no `width` or `height` provided (which is
normal when using `fill`) so the viewBox was undefined. This can also
cause artifacts around the edges. The solution is to change the blur
technique from gaussian to css filter, similar to `next/legacy/image`.
Note: css blur might be [slower in
firefox](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=925025) which is
why we'll only use it for this corner case.
Remove `browsersListForSwc` since it is enabled by default now, and disable `legacyBrowsers` by default.
This PR also bumps the default browserslist to the following:
- Chrome 64+
- Edge 79+
- Firefox 67+
- Opera 51+
- Safari 12+
See related RFC:
- Closes#33227
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
The `target: serverless` config was deprecated a year ago starting in
[Next.js 12](https://nextjs.org/blog/next-12).
Tests were disabled in #41252 so we can now remove `target: serverless`
and all usage of `target` in `next.config.js`.
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
- Enable newNextLinkBehavior. See #36436
- Run next/link codemod on test suite
Note that from when this lands on apps trying canary will need to run
the new-link codemod in order to upgrade.
Ideally we have to detect `<a>` while rendering the new link and warn
for it.
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
This PR introduces breaking changes by renaming components.
- Rename `next/image` to `next/legacy/image`
- Rename `next/future/image` to `next/image`
The diff is very confusing because both components are very similar so git got confused.
Gracefully parse the environment package manager when calling
`create-next-app` instead of passing extra arguments.
Reference: #41090
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
## Bug
The error which is thrown if the fetch method returns not a falsy or
Response value
is misleading.
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
This updates to skip the data request done during query hydration when
middleware is present as it was mainly to gather query params from any
potential rewrites in middleware although this is usually not needed for
static pages and the context can be gathered in different ways on the
client.
x-ref: [slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C045FKE5P51/p1665082474010149)
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## 🐛 What's in there?
`foo instanceof Function` is wrongly considered as Dynamic code evaluation by our static analyzer.
This PR fixes it.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## 🧪 How to reproduce?
1. Create a simple repro in `examples` folder:
```js
// examples/instance-of-function/pages/index.js
export default function Home() {
return <h1>home</h1>
}
// examples/instance-of-function/middleware.js
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
export default async function handler() {
console.log('is arrow a function?', (() => {}) instanceof Function)
return NextResponse.next()
}
```
1. build with next `pnpm next build examples/instance-of-function`
> the build fails
1. rebuild next to include PR's fix `pnpm build`
1. build with new next `pnpm next build examples/instance-of-function`
> the build works
## 📔 Notes to reviewers
`hooks.expression.for(`${prefix}Function`).tap(NAME, handleExpression)` is actually legacy code from the original implementation. It's used when finding `Function` regardless of how it is used. We only want to find `new Function()` or `Function()`, which `hooks.calls` and `hooks.new` are covering.
`eval instanceof Function` is perfectly legit code on the edge, despite its uselessness :lol-think:
Because we got multiple people asking "how do I relax this error when my code contains unreachable dynamic code evaluation", I've copy-pasted details about `config.unstable_allowDynamic` into the error page. Because users do not always click links :blob_shrug:
The behaviour of edge-function-runtime in the case of an error was not
identical to the edge-runtime.
If a type other than "Uint8Array" is written to the Response stream a
unhandledreject is raised and logged.
The current implementations(nodejs) accepts also Buffers and Strings
which causes that a Application
Developer things our stream implementation is broken if it is executed
as worker.
We introduced a helper function to consume the response stream and write
the "Uint8Array" stream chunks
to the server implementation. Due to the complication that the error
side effect is emitted via the unhandledrejection
handler it is almost impossible to test --- jest does not allow testing
of the unhandlerejections.
We tested extendsiveliy the helper in the edge-runtime so that this PR
integrates just the consuming function.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This commit implements the main proposal presented in
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/39241
to add attribution to web vitals.
Attribution adds more specific debugging info to web vitals,
for example in the case of Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS),
we might want to know
> What's the first element that shifted when the single largest layout shift occurred?
on in the case of Largest Contentful Paint (LCP),
> What's the element corresponding to the LCP for the page?
> If it is an image, what's the URL of the image resource?
Attribution is *disabled* by default because it could potentially
generate a lot data and overwhelm the RUM backend.
It is enabled *per metric* (LCP, FCP, CLS, etc)
As part of this change, `web-vitals` has been upgraded to v3.0.0
This version contains minor bug fixes, please see changelog at
9fe3cc02c8Fixes#39241
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
## Feature
Fixes#36819. Closes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/37389.
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
This adds a proper error when we detect conflicting app and page paths.
Fixes: https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C043ANYDB24/p1664678172389449
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: Sukka <isukkaw@gmail.com>
This seems to be the cause for the failure of https://github.com/vercel/next.js/actions/runs/3133433920/jobs/5087331787 that caused[ the revert](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/40967) of my [commit ](11deaaa82b) that changed the edge bundle to SSR.
After investigating, I realised this was the culprit: this forces the test app code to run with this on, somehow, when built on Vercel.
Removing it should fix it. Let's merge if all tests still pass?
Open questions:
- I'm not sure why this is/was needed, since this variable should always be inlined by webpack
- furthermore, this was causing client code to run as-if on the edge?
- but also, this still shouldn't happen because webpack should get rid of it
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This PR adds a new `experimental.enableUndici` option to let the
developer switch from `next-fetch` to `undici` as the underlying
polyfill for `fetch` in Node.js.
In the current implementation, Next.js makes sure that `fetch` is always
available by using `node-fetch`. However, we do not polyfill in Node.js
18+, since those versions come with their own `fetch` implementation
already, built-in.
Node.js 18+ uses `undici` under the hood, so letting the developer use
`undici` earlier could make the migration easier later on.
Eventually, we hope to be able to stop polyfilling `fetch` in an
upcoming major version of Next.js, shipping less code.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
Co-authored-by: Sukka <isukkaw@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Currently, a developer building a website using Next.js could write this
code with no type errors:
```tsx
<Image
width="kangaroo"
height="100px"
quality="medium"
{...rest}
/>
```
This PR adds stricter type checking, which will catch this type of error
earlier.
Similarly, this PR adds stricter types for the `responseLimit`, to
ensure the types align to:
https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/api-routes-response-size-limit
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
For context, making a test change to allow testing CI changes in
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/40910 without approval each run.
@ijjk How's this? The string's not being snapshotted so it shouldn't
break any tests.
