This PR implements page and layout exported `metadata` field support with limited properties.
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <6324199+timneutkens@users.noreply.github.com>
The edge runtime should all use esm assets to keep the hooks and the react context are matched
Fixes: #43080
The issue is caused by the app router context and server inserted html context are not aligned. One side is using esm and other side is using the cjs asset.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
Should be able to resolve `exports.import` condition for esm packages only when import them in server components
Fixes: #42534
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
We insert the content returning from `useServerInsertedHTML` to head
element for app dir, but it shouldn't only inject once since there're
suspense boundaries that could hold insertions.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This PR updates app configurations from `export const config = { ... }`
to be directly exported.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
- Enable newNextLinkBehavior. See #36436
- Run next/link codemod on test suite
Note that from when this lands on apps trying canary will need to run
the new-link codemod in order to upgrade.
Ideally we have to detect `<a>` while rendering the new link and warn
for it.
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
This PR introduces breaking changes by renaming components.
- Rename `next/image` to `next/legacy/image`
- Rename `next/future/image` to `next/image`
The diff is very confusing because both components are very similar so git got confused.
Adds `next/navigation` and `next/headers` APIs. Docs will follow later..
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Since `next/dynamic` has client hooks that not compatible with server
components, and app renderer doesn't provide context (such as
`LoadableContext`) for it to use. Previously we provided a simple
replacement using `React.lazy` for `next/dynamic` if you want to use it
in appDir.
This PR always alias it to the `React.lazy ` implementation for appDir
so that user won't need to worry about the dynamic options. They can
only use `dynamic()` without 2nd options arg
```js
import dynamic from 'next/dynamic'
const Dynamic = dynamic(() => import('./dynamic-component'))
```
We're supposed not to use css-in-js in server components since it will
increase the rsc response for navigation. Also adding `styledJsx` option
for next-swc for controlling styled-jsx transform.
Test case: using styled-jsx transform in server components will not be
transformed to `styled-jsx/style` imports.
Rename `optoutServerComponentsBundle` to `serverComponentsExternalPackages` which describes the feature better.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
The `react-server` condition for `exports` is already covered. This PR adds a new test case to cover the `imports` condition for internal dependencies.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Merge e2e tests customized `node_modules` with installed `node_modules`,
to let you debug easily locally without moving folder between
`node_modules` and `node_modules_bak`
Also add `optoutServerComponentsBundle` to config schema.
We currently resolve the `react-server` condition correctly inside
`externals` for the server layer, however that will cause the resolved
path to be external (as it is called "externals").
So we need a way to hook into the module resolution process to force it
to use the `react-server` condition **when it's on the server layer**.
The `resolve` option doesn't give us that ability, and the solution in
this PR is to leverage `normalModuleFactory`'s resolve hook to override
the resolve options before actually resolving it. And there we can have
the `contextInfo`.
One thing left out is bundling for the edge server, we need to add tests
and sort that out carefully.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
### Issue
When import an esm package in client component, and use it in server
component page, it will fail to SSR but render successfully on client.
It's because the import to esm package will make the client chunk become
an **async module** since esm module will be treated as **async**.
```
page (serve component) -> local module (client) -> external dependency (esm)
```
Then in react SSR layer, it need the module type information of that
chunk, async or not for react so that react could unwrap the async
module from `Promise` properly when SSR.
### Solution
We need to mark the client entries which are effected by async/esm
modules that becoming **async** as `async: true` in SSR manifest.
Since flight manifest plugin is only running against client compiler,
which doesn't have those module information from server compiler. So we
collect the async modules from the **server** compiler **client** layer
from flight entry client plugin, then leverage the collection to detect
if a module is async in flight manifest plugin for react.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Follow-up for #40739 to add an option to opt-out specific packages from being bundled.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
`config.experimental.serverComponents` is currently required to be
enabled or disabled together with `config.experimental.appDir` (which
means `serverComponents === appDir` otherwise it will throw) so there is
no reason to keep both of them. This PR removes `serverComponents` from
Next.js and only rely on `appDir` instead.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This PR changes the external module resolution to eagerly bundle
node_modules, and some specific Next.js internal modules, if on the
`WEBPACK_LAYERS.server` layer. While resolving corresponding packages,
we use the `react-server` export condition (fallbacks to default).
A follow-up PR will be adding a Next.js option to opt-out specific
packages from being bundled on the server layer.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Follow up for https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/40415
Remove internal next client api determination, fully relying on `'client'` directive.
Change `.client.js` extension to `.js ` in tests, remove legacy / unused test files
## Feature
Change server components convention from using `.server.js` / `.client.js` file extension to determine it's a server or client component to using `'client'` js literal as a directive for determine client components boundary.
React RFC: https://github.com/reactjs/rfcs/pull/189
New behavior doesn't consume `.server.js` as server components any more, if you're enabling `serverComponents` flag, every `page.js` in app dir will become server components by default. If you adding a `'client'` directive to the page, then that page will become a client component. This rule also applies to the normal js components, client components will require a `'client'` directive to indicate its identity, instead of having a `.client.js` extension.
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <3676859+shuding@users.noreply.github.com>
This is an initial implementation of the Server Components SWC
transformer. For the server graph, it detects client entries via the
`"client"` directive and transpile them into module reference code; for
the client graph, it removes the directives. And for both graphs, it
checks if there is any invalid imports for the given environment and
shows proper errors.
With that added, we can switch from `next-flight-client-loader` to
directly use the SWC loader in one pass. Next step is to get rid of the
`.client.` extension in other plugins.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
For edge routes in app dir, we passed the page name as url so that the
url will be incorrect:
* a non-dynamic route `/dashboard` will become `/dashboard/page`
* a dynamic route `/dynamic/[id]` with url `/dyanmic/123` will still hit
`/dynamic/page/[id]/page`
This PR uses normalized `params.page` with interoplated as correct
pathname for the page.
Follow-up to #37551
Implements prefetching for the new router.
There are multiple behaviors related to prefetching so I've split them out for each case. The list below each case is what's prefetched:
Reference:
- Checkmark checked → it's implemented.
- RSC Payload → Rendered server components.
- Router state → Patch for the router history state.
- Preloads for client component entry → This will be handled in a follow-up PR.
- No `loading.js` static case → Will be handled in a follow-up PR.
---
- `prefetch={true}` (default, same as current router, links in viewport are prefetched)
- [x] Static all the way down the component tree
- [x] RSC payload
- [x] Router state
- [ ] preloads for the client component entry
- [x] Not static all the way down the component tree
- [x] With `loading.js`
- [x] RSC payload up until the loading below the common layout
- [x] router state
- [ ] preloads for the client component entry
- [x] No `loading.js` (This case can be static files to make sure it’s fast)
- [x] router state
- [ ] preloads for the client component entry
- `prefetch={false}`
- [x] always do an optimistic navigation. We already have this implemented where it tries to figure out the router state based on the provided url. That result might be wrong but the router will automatically figure out that
---
In the first implementation there is a distinction between `hard` and `soft` navigation. With the addition of prefetching you no longer have to add a `soft` prop to `next/link` in order to leverage the `soft` case.
A heuristic has been added that automatically prefers `soft` navigation except when navigating between mismatching dynamic parameters.
An example:
- `app/[userOrTeam]/dashboard/page.js` and `app/[userOrTeam]/dashboard/settings/page.js`
- `/tim/dashboard` → `/tim/dashboard/settings` = Soft navigation
- `/tim/dashboard` → `/vercel/dashboard` = Hard navigation
- `/vercel/dashboard` → `/vercel/dashboard/settings` = Soft navigation
- `/vercel/dashboard/settings` -> `/tim/dashboard` = Hard navigation
---
While adding these new heuristics some of the tests started failing and I found some state bugs in `router.reload()` which have been fixed. An example being when you push to `/dashboard` while on `/` in the same transition it would navigate to `/`, it also wouldn't push a new history entry. Both of these cases are now fixed:
```
React.startTransition(() => {
router.push('/dashboard')
router.reload()
})
```
---
While debugging the various changes I ended up debugging and manually diffing the cache and router state quite often and was looking at a way to automate this. `useReducer` is quite similar to Redux so I was wondering if Redux Devtools could be used in order to debug the various actions as it has diffing built-in. It took a bit of time to figure out the connection mechanism but in the end I figured out how to connect `useReducer`, a new hook `useReducerWithReduxDevtools` has been added, we'll probably want to put this behind a compile-time flag when the new router is marked stable but until then it's useful to have it enabled by default (only when you have Redux Devtools installed ofcourse).
> ⚠️ Redux Devtools is only connected to take incoming actions / state. Time travel and other features are not supported because the state sent to the devtools is normalized to allow diffing the maps, you can't move backward based on that state so applying the state is not connected.
Example of the integration:
<img width="1912" alt="Screen Shot 2022-09-02 at 10 00 40" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6324199/188637303-ad8d6a81-15e5-4b65-875b-1c4f93df4e44.png">
Check `pagesDir` to bypass empty pages folder when appDir is enabled
* Output empty loadable manifest for now if there's no `pagesDir`
* No custom aliases with all page extensions for `/_app`, `_document` if pagesDir is empty, only keep the built-in ones
* Check pagesDir in build/dev-server/eslint
* Type safe: change arguments of some APIs from optional to required, so that we won't mess up with default arguments
### Problem
esm modules imports from client components will be compiled to `m = import('module-name')` when webpack bundles them for server components flight rendering. In this case, they will all become async modules since dyanmic imports will return a promise which react flight cannot handle it then results into module resolving error on server flight rendering.
### Solution
* React flight renderer supports handling async modules in https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/25138
* On next.js side leverage the module proxy change for each client reference, to make sure it always resolve the correct client module
The idea is wrapping each module with a module proxy, and if the module is async and accessed as thenable, it will return a new module reference with `async` label to tell react to handle it as async modules:
exported client reference `*` --> not async module (non thenable) --> original module reference `''`
exported client reference `*` --> it's async module (thenable) --> wrapped module reference `'*'` with `async` label
### Note
Since we need to check if user having incorrect gSSP/gSP specifying in layout client componet, so we still need to parse it and assign those info to the proxy (Does client module containing `ssr`, `ssg` exports). Otherwise the proxy will return the cached module reference
* Use require hook and alias to resolve styled-jsx
* re-export styled-jsx types from compiled
* fix lint
* add test for styled-jsx css
* setup require hook in server
* compile import path to styled-jsx/style
* revert require hook
* add test for server styled-jsx resolving
* update test
* pre copy styled-jsx assets
* fix styled-jsx dts
* add npmrc for styled-jsx e2e test
* load require hook directly
* rm legacy test
* fix lint
* fix pnpm install error
* split require hook
* only alias styled-jsx
* make styled-jsx resolving statically analyzable
* update test
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Use flush effects to custom apply css-in-js solution to app. Re-introduce flush effects to app-render, and remove default support of styled-jsx in `app/`. So that users will choose their own css-in-js solution if they need any customization. styled-jsx won't appear in client bundle if you didn't use it.
For now we have to inject the initial styles before `</head>` to avoid hydration errors. Later on we can remove this once react can handle it.
- [x] inject styles before end of head element
- [x] add tests
Starting in Node.js 18, the `fetch` global was made available and that caused the squoosh implementation to assume it was on a web browser and try to fetch the wasm file instead of reading it from the filesystem. This PR deletes the code trying to fetch since we know that squoosh only runs in the Image Optimization API, not the browser.
- Fixes#38020
- Enables a test that was disabled in #38460
