In a previous PR (#34075), the ISR behavior was introduced to the Image Optimization API, however it changed the cache-control header to always set maxage=0. While this is probably the right behavior (the client shouldn't cache the image), it introduced a regression for users who have CDNs in front of a single Next.js instance (as opposed to [multiple Next.js instances](https://nextjs.org/docs/basic-features/data-fetching/incremental-static-regeneration#self-hosting-isr)).
Furthermore, the pros of client-side caching outweight the cons because its easy to change the image url (add querystring param for example) to invalidate the cache.
This PR reverts the cache-control behavior until we can come up with a better long-term solution.
- Fixes#35987
- Related to #19914
- Related to #22319
- Closes#35596
This PR adds new information to the Next.js deployment documentation to highlight examples or guides for deploying Next.js to a handful of services. This builds on the existing documentation around the Next.js Build API (from `next build`) and options for self-hosting with Node.js or Docker.
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Missing documentation around `NEXT_DATA` hydration when using `getServerSideProps()`. This PR warn users that the result of `getServerSideProps()/getStaticProps` is also available on the client-side due to React Hydration so they should not use any sensitive information in the props.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using [fixes number](https://github.com/vercel/documentation/issues/418)
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
I couldn't understand well this sentence at the first time of reading as a non native english speaker. I think 'that' is needed here.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
I've improved jest configuration that :
1. Starts collecting test coverage
1. Does not collect coverage for derived files or coverage info itself
1. Uses coverage provider that is based on node itself.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Came across this [Slack thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C02F56A54LU/p1642206518128400). Update the docs about adding `locale` string in `getStaticPaths` docs.
## Feature
- [ ] Related issues linked using #32772
- [x] Documentation added
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Closes: #32772
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
In order to turn the API Routes docs more clear about the file extensions when using `pageExtensions`.
I know that it was already explained [here](https://nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/next.config.js/custom-page-extensions).
But just think about the DX: If a developer have a trouble with an API endpoint not working properly should it check it on custom-page-extensions page or api-routes page itself??
Related to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/8178.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Based on https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/36551#issuecomment-1113457752 making the docs more clear which also aligns with the wording of Environment Variables in Middlerware: https://nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/next/server#how-do-i-access-environment-variables
See also: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/20869#issuecomment-757799953
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
We added custom _app as server component support in #33149, but we found it's pretty confusing on usage like support it both server component pages and regular pages at the same time for having similar layout purpose.
When using the _app.server and _app at the same time, applying them into proper places become more confusing.
In that case, we decide to make _app.js can't be a server component, and you can still keep all the existing thing there. And also you don't need to think of the corresponding APIs of custom _app in RSC
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Docs updated
_Hello Next.js team! First PR here, I hope I've followed the right practices._
### What's in there?
It has been decided to only support the following uses cases in Next.js' middleware:
- rewrite the URL (`x-middleware-rewrite` response header)
- redirect to another URL (`Location` response header)
- pass on to the next piece in the request pipeline (`x-middleware-next` response header)
1. during development, a warning on console tells developers when they are returning a response (either with `Response` or `NextResponse`).
2. at build time, this warning becomes an error.
3. at run time, returning a response body will trigger a 500 HTTP error with a JSON payload containing the detailed error.
All returned/thrown errors contain a link to the documentation.
This is a breaking feature compared to the _beta_ middleware implementation, and also removes `NextResponse.json()` which makes no sense any more.
### How to try it?
- runtime behavior: `HEADLESS=true yarn jest test/integration/middleware/core`
- build behavior : `yarn jest test/integration/middleware/build-errors`
- development behavior: `HEADLESS=true yarn jest test/development/middleware-warnings`
### Notes to reviewers
The limitation happens in next's web adapter. ~The initial implementation was to check `response.body` existence, but it turns out [`Response.redirect()`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/packages/next/server/web/spec-compliant/response.ts#L42-L53) may set the response body (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/31886). Hence why the proposed implementation specifically looks at response headers.~
`Response.redirect()` and `NextResponse.redirect()` do not need to include the final location in their body: it is handled by next server https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/packages/next/server/next-server.ts#L1142
Because this is a breaking change, I had to adjust several tests cases, previously returning JSON/stream/text bodies. When relevant, these middlewares are returning data using response headers.
About DevEx: relying on AST analysis to detect forbidden use cases is not as good as running the code.
Such cases are easy to detect:
```js
new Response('a text value')
new Response(JSON.stringify({ /* whatever */ })
```
But these are false-positive cases:
```js
function returnNull() { return null }
new Response(returnNull())
function doesNothing() {}
new Response(doesNothing())
```
However, I see no good reasons to let users ship middleware such as the one above, hence why the build will fail, even if _technically speaking_, they are not setting the response body.
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
This PR deprecates declaring a middleware under `pages` in favour of the project root naming it after `middleware` instead of `_middleware`. This is in the context of having a simpler execution model for middleware and also ships some refactor work. There is a ton of a code to be simplified after this deprecation but I think it is best to do it progressively.
With this PR, when in development, we will **fail** whenever we find a nested middleware but we do **not** include it in the compiler so if the project is using it, it will no longer work. For production we will **fail** too so it will not be possible to build and deploy a deprecated middleware. The error points to a page that should also be reviewed as part of **documentation**.
Aside from the deprecation, this migrates all middleware tests to work with a single middleware. It also splits tests into multiple folders to make them easier to isolate and work with. Finally it ships some small code refactor and simplifications.
This PR changes the experimental `layout=raw` images to use the native lazy loading behavior (as opposed to the IntersectionObserver).
This will (eventually) lead to smaller client bundles and faster image loading since there is no JS needed to load the image.
However, we'll lose the `lazyRoot` and `lazyBoundary` behavior since those are specific to the IntersectionObserver implementation.
Clarify that the environment variables are ordered in descending priority and that the existing system environment is not overridden.
fixes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/36966
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using [19693](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/19693)
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ x] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Closes#29959
If I understand correctly, a page that relies on `publicRuntimeConfig` must be server-side rendered, then that page need either `getInitalProps` or `getServerSideProps`, or the application has a Custom App with `getInitialProps` enabled.
* remove the experimental web vital hook api
* remove the exported flush effects api and only error on development, keep only usage to styled-jsx
for web vital hook API: The usage is not widly adopted since the existing exported vital api could do the same work. In the future we'll deprecate the `_app.server` in favor of `_app` in server component pages. so that this api won't be required.
for flush effects api: other css-in-js libs are not using the same approach like styled-jsx which holding a style registry and could flush it during streaming. emotion-js and styled-components are still relying on `Document.getInitialProps` atm and we have supported it in latest canary
Small docs fix. We've got a snazzy new website at typescript-eslint.io. Eventually the .md docs pages will serve just as partial docs sources, not the right URL to visit.
fixes#28453
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [X] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [X] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
This PR moves the instructions for configuring CI providers to preserve Next.js's build cache out of the _No Cache Detected_ error message and into ~the _Deployment_~ a new page within the _Advanced Features_ docs.
This change is beneficial because it makes the CI configuration examples visible in the context of other helpful documentation for deploying Next.js.
👉 **Prior to this change, these CI configuration examples didn't show up in the Next.js docs.**
The relocated instructions are now linked on the _No Cache Detected_ error message page.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Co-authored-by: Lee Robinson <me@leerob.io>
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
copy/pasting the SCSS example into VSCode results in linter warning. Fixed with semicolon on variable assignment. Added the second semicolon for consistency.
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR updates the copy in the source maps section of the docs to reflect the improvement made to webpack that generate source maps.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
## Documentation / Examples
- Updating Tina Demo URL
- Adding Tina to blog-starter example
- Adding Tina to Basic features section
- Updating Tina to actually work again
This PR introduces a more predictable API to manipulate cookies in an Edge Function context.
```js
const response = new NextResponse()
// set a cookie
response.cookies.set('foo, 'bar') // => set-cookie: 'foo=bar; Path=/'`
// set another cookie
response.cookies.set('fooz, 'barz') // => set-cookie: 'foo=bar; Path=/, fooz=barz; Path=/'`
// delete a cookie means mark it as expired
response.cookies.delete('foo') // => set-cookie: 'foo=; Path=/; Expires=Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT, fooz=barz; Path=/'`
// clear all cookies means mark all of them as expired
response.cookies.clear() // => set-cookie: 'fooz=; Path=/; Expires=Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT, foo=; Path=/; Expires=Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT'`
```
This new cookies API uses [Map](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Map) interface, and it's available for `NextRequest` and `NextResponse`.
Additionally, you can pass a specific cookies option as a third argument in `set` method:
```js
response.cookies.set('foo', 'bar', {
path: '/',
maxAge: 60 * 60 * 24 * 7,
httpOnly: true,
sameSite: 'strict',
domain: 'example.com'
}
```
**Note**: `maxAge` it's in seconds rather than milliseconds.
Any cookie manipulation will be reflected over the `set-cookie` header, transparently.
closes#31719
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
…rding due to customer confusion
This PR updates the middleware (edge functions) api docs environment section to remove the dev and prod wording due to customer confusion
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
## Description
This PR implements a new configuration object in `next.config.js` called `experimental.images.remotePatterns`.
This will eventually deprecate `images.domains` because it covers the same use cases and more by allowing wildcard pattern matching on `hostname` and `pathname` and also allows restricting `protocol` and `port`.
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request.
- [x] Related issues linked
- [x] Unit tests added
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [x] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Related
- Fixes#27925
- Closes#18429
- Closes#18632
- Closes#18730
- Closes#27345
This variable is exported by next but undocumented, and its usage is necessary to build auxiliary scripts for your server-side applications. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/36237#issuecomment-1117694528 for an example.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
Mention that the HTTP.IncomingMessage object is augmented by `cookies` in getServerSideProps
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Improve wording
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`
* Added type to Page Component for TypeScript
Following this tutorial, I noticed that TS was complaining that "getLayout" did not exist on Page. That is normal since Page is typed as NextPage. I simply exported the new type we create in "_App.tsx" and used it as the return type for Page. This will probably help others seeing that red in their editors and perhaps being confused.
* Small linting change
* Apply suggestions from code review
* Update layouts.md
* lint fix
* update type
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
