## Feature
Change server components convention from using `.server.js` / `.client.js` file extension to determine it's a server or client component to using `'client'` js literal as a directive for determine client components boundary.
React RFC: https://github.com/reactjs/rfcs/pull/189
New behavior doesn't consume `.server.js` as server components any more, if you're enabling `serverComponents` flag, every `page.js` in app dir will become server components by default. If you adding a `'client'` directive to the page, then that page will become a client component. This rule also applies to the normal js components, client components will require a `'client'` directive to indicate its identity, instead of having a `.client.js` extension.
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <3676859+shuding@users.noreply.github.com>
This fixes the WASM handling for edge during deploy as the sandbox
context won't be present so we should keep this restricted to dev. No
additional tests were added as our existing tests caught this.
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/39539
Fixes:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/actions/runs/3049403049/jobs/4915784368
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
This is an initial implementation of the Server Components SWC
transformer. For the server graph, it detects client entries via the
`"client"` directive and transpile them into module reference code; for
the client graph, it removes the directives. And for both graphs, it
checks if there is any invalid imports for the given environment and
shows proper errors.
With that added, we can switch from `next-flight-client-loader` to
directly use the SWC loader in one pass. Next step is to get rid of the
`.client.` extension in other plugins.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Continues #39778Closes#40499
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Closes#40571
An earlier fix in #24481 did not consider the `/` case. The page path normalization method `normalizePagePath` turned `/` into `/index` and the route matching was skipped for the index route's non-existent HTML file.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
<!--
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
- [ ] -->
## Feature
- [x] Implements https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/40112
- [x] Integration tests added
Adds a new option to the current font optimization to enable
experimental font size adjust
The new `optimizeFonts` config will be
```
optimizeFonts: {
inlineFonts: true,
experimentalAdjustFallbacks: false,
},
```
To enable the feature, set `experimentalAdjustFallbacks: true`
`optimizeFonts: false` will disable the entire feature (including
inlining google font definition)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
If in `resolve.fallback` we set previously polyfilled modules to `false`
instead of an empty object, webpack will pass the compilation _and_ not
include any polyfills.
Fixes#40522, fixes#40364
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #40562`
fixes#40562
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: Steven <229881+styfle@users.noreply.github.com>
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- fixes
- #38528
- #40432
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Hi, it is my first pull request in this project.
So... if you need anything more tasks, please tell me.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
x-ref: https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/25267
Bump the version of `react-server-dom-webpack` and use `experimental_use` to unwrap the promise to access RSC payload instead of using `readRoot`. `readRoot` is removed from the response type.
This masks flight parameters from middleware so it doesn't interfere with RSC or routing.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <6324199+timneutkens@users.noreply.github.com>
`shake_exports` relies on `ecma_transforms_optimization`, otherwise this will be thrown if running tests:
```
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: could not find `optimization` in `transforms`
--> crates/core/src/shake_exports.rs:7:23
|
7 | ecma::transforms::optimization::simplify::dce::{dce, Config as DCEConfig},
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ could not find `optimization` in `transforms`
```
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This upgrades @makeswift/runtime to the latest version, which adds
support for the Slot control.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Ref: #40002#40026#40191Fixes#40025
This is the final step of fixing #40025. The PR migrates the rest of the
`next/script` test cases to run in both dev (strict mode) and
production, confirming that the `next/script` component is now
completely concurrent rendering resilient and is ready for the upcoming
React 18 `<OffScreen />`.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Another step toward fixing #40025.
Multiple `next/script` components with the same `src` may exist in the
Next.js app. So the `loadScript` function will always attach the
`onLoad` handler to the `loadingPromise` every time it executes.
However, with strict mode (or wrapped inside the `<OffScreen />`
component), the `useEffect` could execute more than once for the same
`next/script` component, thus the `loadScript` for each `next/script`
component could execute more than once (and `onLoad` to be attached more
than once), results in `onLoad` fires more than once.
The PR makes sure that for every `next/script` component mounted, the
`loadScript` will always be executed only once for each of them.
The corresponding `onload fires correctly` integration test case is also
updated to run in dev mode.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Adds some of the tests we didn't have yet for app.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
In order to make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we
request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
As pointed out in
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/40389#issuecomment-1243039792,
the `filter` matched more files than necessary and merged different
example directories together. This change makes the filter match the
example directory name precisely.
Fixes#40389
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <18369201+balazsorban44@users.noreply.github.com>
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
- Use React.startTransition instead of useTransition
- Upgrade to latest React experimental
- Split router cache invalidate into separate function
Some minor cleanup while verifying behaviors.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
In order to make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we
request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
Closes#40497
Ref: https://pnpm.io/cli/link, https://stackoverflow.com/a/70266777
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
`eslint-plugin-react` has a broken version between v7.31.2-6. Upping the version range ensure that only functioning packages get installed.
Fixes#40245
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
In order to make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we
request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Made an addition to the version history within the Script component
docs. In the docs there are examples where the Script component is being
used within a _document.js/tsx file, but it does not get mentioned that
this is only supported from version 12.2.2 onwards.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
## Summary
This PR adds a note about how to see the data that this error is complaining about:
```sh
Warning: data for page "/" is xxx which exceeds the threshold of 128 kB, this amount of data can reduce performance.
```
This debug trick was something I came across in a [discussion](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/39880) and I thought it would be helpful to others like it was for me.
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Such bots typically navigate websites using hard navigations (as they
crawl one URL at a time). Respectively, they do not benefit from
prefetches at all, while increasing the cost of both the crawl and
operating the site.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
In order to make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we
request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Follow-up to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/39539 as discussed
this renames to `unstable_` prefix initially while we test this out
further.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
### 📖 What's in there?
Dynamic code evaluation (`eval()`, `new Function()`, ...) is not
supported on the edge runtime, hence why we fail the build when
detecting such statement in the middleware or `experimental-edge` routes
at build time.
However, there could be false positives, which static analysis and
tree-shaking can not exclude:
- `qs` through these dependencies (get-intrinsic:
[source](https://github.com/ljharb/get-intrinsic/blob/main/index.js#L12))
- `function-bind`
([source](https://github.com/Raynos/function-bind/blob/master/implementation.js#L42))
- `has`
([source](https://github.com/tarruda/has/blob/master/src/index.js#L5))
This PR leverages the existing `config` export to let user allow some of
their files.
it’s meant for allowing users to import 3rd party modules who embed
dynamic code evaluation, but do not use it (because or code paths), and
can't be tree-shaked.
By default, it’s keeping the existing behavior: warn in dev, fails to
build.
If users allow dynamic code, and that code is reached at runtime, their
app stills breaks.
### 🧪 How to test?
- (existing) integration tests for disallowing dynamic code evaluation:
`pnpm testheadless --testPathPattern=runtime-dynamic`
- (new) integration tests for allowing dynamic code evaluation: `pnpm
testheadless --testPathPattern=runtime-configurable`
- (amended) production tests for validating the new configuration keys:
`pnpm testheadless --testPathPattern=config-validations`
To try it live, you could have an application such as:
```js
// lib/index.js
/* eslint-disable no-eval */
export function hasUnusedDynamic() {
if ((() => false)()) {
eval('100')
}
}
export function hasDynamic() {
eval('100')
}
// pages/index.jsx
export default function Page({ edgeRoute }) {
return <p>{edgeRoute}</p>
}
export const getServerSideProps = async (req) => {
const res = await fetch(`http://localhost:3000/api/route`)
const data = await res.json()
return { props: { edgeRoute: data.ok ? `Hi from the edge route` : '' } }
}
// pages/api/route.js
import { hasDynamic } from '../../lib'
export default async function handle() {
hasDynamic()
return Response.json({ ok: true })
}
export const config = {
runtime: 'experimental-edge' ,
allowDynamic: '/lib/**'
}
```
Playing with `config.allowDynamic`, you should be able to:
- build the app even if it uses `eval()` (it will obviously fail at
runtime)
- build the app that _imports but does not use_ `eval()`
- run the app in dev, even if it uses `eval()` with no warning
### 🆙 Notes to reviewers
Before adding documentation and telemetry, I'd like to collect comments
on a couple of points:
- the overall design for this feature: is a list of globs useful and
easy enough?
- should the globs be relative to the application root (current
implementation) to to the edge route/middleware file?
- (especially to @sokra) is the implementation idiomatic enough? I've
leverage loaders to read the _entry point_ configuration once, then the
ModuleGraph to get it back during the parsing phase. I couldn't re-use
the existing `getExtractMetadata()` facility since it's happening late
after the parsing.
- there's a glitch with `import { ServerRuntime } from '../../types'` in
`get-page-static-info.ts`
([here](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/39539/files#diff-cb7ac6392c3dd707c5edab159c3144ec114eafea92dad5d98f4eedfc612174d2L12)).
I had to use `next/types` because it was failing during lint. Any clue
why?
### ☑️ Checklist
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [x] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
We now maintain a landing page of all monorepo examples with Next.js apps. We can point users here instead.
- [X] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [X] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
I was a little confused by the `loading` property having the value `<header />`. I think that property is meant to show a loading state while the file is being loaded? If my assumption is correct, I think this change makes sense.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
See the blog post:
https://nextjs.org/blog/next-12-3##swc-minifier-stable
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Found that the cause was that `React.useId()` returns the same value across requests whereas it was being used to create a unique key. On further inspection that code could be removed altogether as `id` was not used client-side and the `rscCache` map is no longer needed as the flight instance is already being created per request so it can live in the context of the request execution.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This PR updates the server components documentation to make it more clear the benefit of server components and what their current status is inside Next.js.
It removes code snippets and CTAs for trying them out, as things have changed with the Layouts RFC since these docs were previously written. With the upcoming changes, server components will now be the default inside `app`. The list of supported and unsupported features was no longer accurate.
We will be providing more guidance as the layouts and routing changes are ready to be tested.
[Read the Layouts RFC](https://nextjs.org/blog/layouts-rfc) for more details.
This ensures we ignore all except the files/directories we are explicitly wanting to watch to prevent watching/considering directories with massive amounts of files slowing down startup.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/38483#issuecomment-1242154665
