Currently this is uploading every time the job is run even if it's a
cache hit and this step can take over 3 minutes un-necessarily so this
skips it if a cache hit occurred.
### What?
Another attempt to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/50619 and WEB-1150, trying to apply setup guard more throughly.
I still do not know why original PR passed CI but fails to subsequent PRs after merge, but hope this could be a right guard to prevent unexpected failures.
### Description
Set some environment variables that reduce size on disk and make the
build a little faster.
Also, read the toolchain from the `rust-toolchain` file, so it's not
duplicated in every workflow.
Ported over from the `turbo` repo.
Updates to re-use our build workflow so turbo remote cache is leveraged
and updates re-usable workflow reference to be the same branch instead
of main.
This adds uploading the turbo run summaries for our publish builds so we
can debug cache misses there easier the same as the new build_reusable
workflow.
### What?
This PR updates existing CI worfklow for building Turbopack (`@next/swc`), and report its bytesize per target triple as additional metrics. It will be included in datadog's pipeline execution traces.
It would be better to track this per-PR, or per-commits but building all native binaries per each commit is too expensive. For now, tracking it when we deploy and actually build new release binaries.
### What?
This PR attempts to enable datadog trace integrations to the next.js integration tests if env is configured. With this, datadog can observe each test suite's results and detect some meaningful information (i.e flaky) for us.
However, I wasn't able to verify this works with next.js repo since for some reason CI worker does not pick up the api key in the env (https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C04KC8A53T7/p1685597124894539). Still this won't affect existing workflow, and once enabled I can test it over vercel/turbo repo instead.
Partially resolved WEB-1150.
### What?
This PR allows to trigger subset of build-and-deploy workflow manually via gh actions UI.
### Why?
Turbopack time to time requires to validate its changes against all of the platforms we build. Adding manual workflow allows to test it easier.
It tries to guard release check `isRelease` only if it comes from normal event (non manual dispatch) to avoid accidental publish workflow.
Ensures we continue pre-building binaries on merge to canary and ensures
we are testing against the maintenance Node.js version also adds turbo
summarize for all swc builds.
This breaks up some of our longest running tests which allows more
parallelizing of the tests. This also moves turbopack tests filtering
back to an allow list as it is running a lot of unrelated tests
currently which isn't ideal. We should only be running against tests
that are explicitly testing turbopack e.g. build tests should not be
duplicated in the turbopack group.
```sh
test/integration/css/test/group-1.test.js: 762.655
test/integration/edge-runtime-module-errors/test/index.test.js: 695.309
test/integration/css/test/group-2.test.js: 671.848
test/integration/i18n-support/test/index.test.js: 518.173
test/integration/scss-modules/test/index.test.js: 451.704
test/integration/css-features/test/index.test.js: 417.318
test/integration/css-modules/test/index.test.js: 403.405
test/integration/eslint/test/index.test.js: 381.563
test/integration/500-page/test/index.test.js: 371.134
test/integration/telemetry/test/index.test.js: 367.691
test/development/acceptance-app/ReactRefreshLogBox.test.ts: 335.878
test/integration/create-next-app/templates.test.ts: 334.01
test/integration/scss/test/group-2.test.js: 327.255
test/integration/scss/test/group-1.test.js: 318.574
test/integration/edge-runtime-configurable-guards/test/index.test.js: 313.834
test/e2e/instrumentation-hook/instrumentation-hook.test.ts: 294.618
test/development/acceptance-app/error-recovery.test.ts: 283.355
test/e2e/app-dir/app/vercel-speed-insights.test.ts: 278.242
test/integration/create-next-app/index.test.ts: 272.442
```
This adds new `build and test` and `build and deploy` workflows in favor
of the existing massive `build, test, and deploy` workflow. Since the
new workflows will use `pull_request_target` this waits to remove the
existing workflow until the new one is tested.
While testing this new workflow flakey behavior in tests have also been
addressed. Along with the new workflow we will also be leveraging new
runners which allow us to run tests against the production binary of
`next-swc` so this avoids slight differences in tests we've seen due to
running against the dev binary.
Furthermore we will have a new flow for allowing workflow runs on PRs
from external forks which will either require a comment be checking a
box approving the run after each change or a label added by the team.
The new flow also no longer relies on `actions/cache` or similar which
have proven to be pretty unreliable.
Tests runs with the new workflow can be seen here
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/actions/runs/5100673508/jobs/9169416949
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
### What?
WEB-1086.
This PR flips the way running next.js integration test with Turbopack,
instead of using allowlist to run selectively enabled test now uses
denylists. The immediate effect is now any new test being added (as a
new file) will be executed with Turbopack by default, and should be
manually excluded if it fails.
Still, the number of tests we run remains same.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
This PR adjusts manifests for the next.js test with Turbopack, as I
found upstream test keep changing and need to sync its latests state
into the manifest.
Manifest is now .js file contains 2 arrays, one for the enabled, and
others for the disabled. Disabled doesn't mean it's always failing
though.
### What?
Disable `tracing/release_max_level_info` for non-published release
builds. I modified CI script to strip out logging for published
binaries.
### Why?
x-ref: https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03EWR7LGEN/p1683621374204959
It's required to print logging for turbopack.
### How?
Closes WEB-1032
---------
Co-authored-by: Tobias Koppers <tobias.koppers@googlemail.com>
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
### What?
This PR changes to the `root` of the cargo workspace to the root of repo
itself, allows next-swc and other rust codebase can use repo root as
workspace root.
### Why?
Currently cargo manifest for the next-swc is not placed under the root
of the repo, which makes invocation to the tool requires to change cwd /
or set cwd. Similarly needs to open editor to the root of the cargo
manifest separately to able to utilize language server kicks in. Moving
manifest to the root consolidates those, so can invoke either cli / or
editor to the same root of the repo.
### What?
* move some shared runtime logic to turbopack
* use relative imports from internal code when possible
* move react-refresh logic to turbopack
* move benchmark code logic to turobpack
see https://github.com/vercel/turbo/pull/4553
### Why?
We want to have benchmarking again for turbopack PRs
We want to have a standalone turbopack cli (eventually)
We want to avoid duplicating the runtime code
### How?
refactoring, moving code
### What?
enables the benchmark tests from turbopack again
### Why?
It tests common scenarios like HMR
fixes WEB-792
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Kirszenberg <alex.kirszenberg@vercel.com>
