### What
Remove creating client proxy for each ESM export, instead for ESM we
create a CJS module proxy for itself and access the property with export
name as the actual export.
### Why
`proxy` is the module proxy that we treat the module as a client
boundary.
For ESM, we access the property of the module proxy directly for each
export.
This is bit hacky that treating using a CJS like module proxy for ESM's
exports,
but this will avoid creating nested proxies for each export. It will be
improved in the future.
Notice that for `next/dynamic`, if you're doing a dynamic import of
client component in server component, and trying to access the named
export directly, it will error. Instead you need to align the dynamic
import resolved value wrapping with a `default:` property (e.g. `{
default: resolved }`) like what `React.lazy` accepted.
Revert #57301Fixes#66212
x-ref:
[slack](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C04DUD7EB1B/p1716897764858829)
Update devdependecies tar and type.
I have only imported the necessary function, maybe it is a little
unverbose, we can use instead of ‘x’ => ‘extract’.
---------
Co-authored-by: torresgol10.itd <torresgol10.itd@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sam Ko <sam@vercel.com>
During navigations, the `FlightDataPath` property from the server
response can be an array if there are multiple parallel routes (eg,
`children` and `slot`). When we apply server response to the router
cache, we might call `applyFlightData` for each segment path, which will
copy existing cache values and insert new ones depending on what
changed.
However, the `existingCache` argument that we pass to this function is
the cache at the start of the navigation. That means subsequent calls to
`applyFlightData` will reference the cache _before_ updates are made to
it. This will cause it to erroneously think it needs to lazy fetch for
missing data.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
When checking which segment(s) need to be refreshed, we currently
compare the current page URL with the segment's refresh marker.
We should inspect the `mutable.canonicalUrl` value first since that's
the URL we're changing to, followed by `state.canonicalUrl` as a
fallback (indicating that there's no URL change pending). This is
because the server action handler will receive a redirect URL prior to
`location.pathname` being updated, so the router will incorrectly think
it needs to refresh the data for the page we're going to.
Closes NEXT-3500
This flag remained experimental because the IPC implementation didn't
play nicely with requests containing large payloads, due to it being
stringified as GET parameters. This branching logic also poses
challenges for some upcoming work related to detecting IO.
This removes the handling for the
`experimental.staticWorkerRequestDeduping` flag which we can revisit in
the future with a sounder approach. This also cleans up some of the IPC
server utilities as it wasn't in use anywhere else.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
This PR fixes the same case mention in #66464. Instead of collecting all
values eagerly, here we merge fields (on any level of depth) of the same
value and skip methods. For example:
```ts
foo.bar
foo.bar.baz
qux.fn()
```
Previously we're (wrongly) collecting `[foo.bar, foo.bar.baz, qux.fn]`,
and now it will be just `[foo.bar, qux]`.
Merging of fields is critical for collecting methods correctly because
in theory we can't tell if an object member is a method or not:
```ts
data.push.call(data, 1)
// or inside a function that does the same:
doPush(data.push, data)
```
If we don't merge fields we'll collect `[data.push, data]` which still
fails.
### What & Why
Fixes NEXT-3498
Fixed loading shows up and disappear during client navigation, when you
defined `prefetch` is enabled and slow `generateMetadata` is defined. In
#64532, where in layout-router, we removed the place of infinite
suspense, adding it back so that the app can still remain suspensy
during navigation.
#### Behavior before fix
Prefetch -> Link Navigation -> Show `loading.js` -> RSC payload fetched
(no page content) -> the page content will display later when the
promise is resolved
#### Behavior after the fix
Prefetch -> Link Navigation -> Show `loading.js` -> RSC payload fetched
-> suspensy page content still triggering `loading.js` -> display the
resolved page content when the promise is resolved
---------
Co-authored-by: Zack Tanner <1939140+ztanner@users.noreply.github.com>
New PR
Update DevDependecies "validate-npm-package-name" and type
PR closed: #66420
---------
Co-authored-by: torresgol10.itd <torresgol10.itd@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sam Ko <sam@vercel.com>
When `router.refresh` or a server action creates a new `CacheNode` tree,
we were erroneously not copying over the `loading` segment in the new
tree. This would cause the subtree to be remounted as the loading
segment switched from having a Suspense boundary to not having one.
Fixes#66029Fixes#66499
This removes the previous `server/future` directory and moves everything
into the `server` or `server/lib` directories. This is aimed to start to
flatten the server application structure.
### What?
optimize allocations in server actions transform
In one edge case it reduces allocations from 30GB to 4.5MB and time from
760ms to 11ms.
### Why?
make it faster
### What?
* order of CSS between layout and page
* order of CSS between page and next/dynamic
### Why?
### How?
* overrides webpack CSS chunk loading to use react CSS loading to allow
them to share the order
This takes the `layerAssets` property from the previous PR and actually
renders it, replacing the previous style handling. This ensures that
when multiple page segments are rendered on screen, all of their
associated CSS files are loaded. The existing `findHeadInCache` method
only ever returns a single head node, which means it’d miss stylesheets.
Fixes#59308Fixes#63465
This adds a new `layerAssets` property (containing styles and script
tags) to `FlightDataPath`. Previously these were lumped in with the
`head` node, but we intentionally only ever render a single `head`, to
avoid duplicating metadata. This would mean `<AppRouter />` would only
ever render imported stylesheets for a single page in a racey way.
However, since Float handles hoisting and deduping these style tags,
we're safe to render them for each segment.
This PR introduces no change in behavior, aside from sending
`layerAssets` down from the server and storing it in the client router
cache. These nodes aren't rendered -- this is done in #66300.
This adds details for every ISR cache request if the page being
requested supports PPR. If it does, it'll attempt to load the
`.prefetch.rsc` payload instead of the `.rsc` payload. This corrects a
bug that was present in deployed environments.
This additionally refactors the `isAppPPREnabled` out of most of the
application, as it's only used to determine if we should add to the
`prefetchDataRoute` fields in the `prerender-manifest.json`. To support
loading the prefetch file or not, we pass the `isRoutePPREnabled`
through with the cache get/set operations instead.
x-slack-ref:
https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C075MSFK9ML/p1717094328986429
### What?
If the error message contains a reference to `node_modules` it would
omit the error message, but actually we only want to omit the stack
frames
### Why?
### How?
