### Summary
Migrate `next/dynamic` to implementation based on `React.lazy` and
`Suspense`. Then it becomes easier to migrate the existing code in pages
to layouts. Then we can support both `ssr` and `loading` option for
`next/dynamic`.
For `loading` option, it will work like `Suspense`'s `fallback` property
```js
<Suspense fallback={loading}>
<DynamicComponent />
</Suspense>
```
For `ssr` option, by default `React.lazy` supports SSR, but we'll
disable the `ssr: false` case for dynamic import in server components
since there's no client side involved.
Then we don't need `suspense` option anymore as react >= 18 is always
required. Mark it as deprecated.
It also supports to load client component dynamically in server
components now.
#### Code code changes
* switch loadable component to `lazy` + `Suspense`
* will make sure it's retuning a module from `loader()` to
`loader().then(mod => ({ default: mod.default || mod }))` since `lazy()`
only accepts loader returning a module
* Inside suspense boundary, throwing an error for ssr: false, catch the
error on server and client side and ignore it.
* Ignore options like ssr: false for server components since they're on
server, doesn't make sense
* Remove legacy dynamic related transform
#### Feature changes
* `next/dynamic` will work in the same way across the board (appDir and
pages)
* For the throwing error, will make it become a API that throws error
later in the future, so users can customize more with `Suspense`
* You can load client components now in server components with dynamic.
Resolves#43147
#### Tests
* existing dynamic tests all work
* add case: import client component and load through next/dynamic in
server components
### Issues
This is one of the required changes to refactor bundling strategy for
pages and app.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Previously we were assuming that `serverOnlyChanges` is the same as
"server component changes". However that's not always true, as one can
change a component from server component to client component, or vice
versa, where the change affects both server and client builds, so
`serverOnlyChanges` will be empty.
This PR fixes the logic by strictly hashing and comparing modules in the
server layer. Note that I intentionally skipped the test as this fix
[isn't
complete](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C035J346QQL/p1670343453333079).
NEX-30
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
### Description
* Gives us [Vercel] more SEO juice rather than GitHub.
* Gives us the freedom to control GitHub repo file structure independent from URLs.
## Feature
- [x] Documentation added
Reverts vercel/next.js#43597
The tests were disabled and currently the checking of these components
are not reliable, it also breaks the hmr. Revert it for now and then
we'll revisit how to re-enable the required tags checking
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
There has been a few complaints about memory usage of the Next.js 13 dev server. One of the reasons why is that prefetching is always enabled when a link is visible on app routes (and not on pages). Disabling this behaviour, whilst keeping prefetching on hover/click, should help improve resources usage.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [x] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
When someone installs jest extension it will run all the tests
that is not possible in this repo because there is so many
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
It seems that setting `NEXT_MANUAL_SIG_HANDLE` in `.env` file is not working, so I added some notes.
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Updates our test config to take advantage of more concurrency and also
updates to leverage the playwright docker image to reduce flakes from
actions/setup-node stalling or playwright dependencies stalling on `apt
install`.
This reduces our test times from upwards of 30 minutes down to back
around 15 minutes.
### Update
We removed the `<head>` element checking for root layout in #41621. Since we also need `<head>` for preload in the future, and also css-in-js will require that. We're adding back the `head` element checking to make sure user always provide valid root layout including it.
### Issue
An issue was reported [here](https://github.com/mui/material-ui/issues/34905#issuecomment-1331945868) that the Emotion/MUI site was suffering from FOUC.
After an inspection, I noticed that the SSRed HTML didn't contain the inserted styles at all - despite them being inserted through `useServerInsertedHTML`. I managed to debug it down and discovered that their layout was missing `<head></head>` and thus the stream transformer skipped the insertion altogether cause of this check:
fbc98abab3/packages/next/server/node-web-streams-helper.ts (L177-L183)
I've figured that at the very least we could surface this as a console error in development to nudge the user to fix the missing `<head/>`
cc @huozhi
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
In #42987 we added support for `transpilePackages` in `next/jest`, but
the pattern is not functioning how we would expect here, and as a result
all modules from `node_modules` are getting transformed. File patterns
that should not be transformed should match, but due to the trailing
`/`, no packages are matching.
Currently (no match, incorrectly gets transformed):
https://regexr.com/73fvo
With this fix (matches, correctly does not get transformed):
https://regexr.com/73fvr
As far as I can tell, the `pnpm` pattern is being generated correctly.
@balazsorban44 I wasn't sure the best way to test this one, let me know
if you've got an idea. 🙏
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
Closes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/42768
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Added an image gallery example using Next.js and Cloudinary.
Edit: This is now ready to ship!
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <18369201+balazsorban44@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
