<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Fixes#63871
-->
### What?
Adds safe traversal to rewrite `has` items in a certain new
(`isInterceptionRouteRewrite()` added in the v14.2.0 canaries) check to
the rewrite routes.
### Why?
The new check assumed that all `has` arrays had at least one item, when
previously Next.js accepted rewrites with empty `has`. Adding safe
traversal doesn't negatively impact the check, as the check only needs
rewrites with the first item.
Fixes#63871
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This PR introduces 2 experimental options for doing more work in the
webpack build in parallel instead of in serial. These options may
improve the performance of builds at the cost of more memory.
`parallelServerAndEdgeCompiles`: This option kicks off the builds for
both `server` and `edge-server` at the same time instead of waiting for
each to complete before the next one. In applications that have many
server and edge functions, this can increase performance by doing that
work in parallel. This can be used with `next build` or `next
experimental-compile`.
`parallelServerBuildTraces`: This option starts the server build traces
as soon as the server compile completes and runs it in the background
while the other compilations are happening. With this option enabled,
some unnecessary work may be done since ordinarily the client
compilation provides information that can reduce the amount of tracing
necessary. However, since it is in parallel with the other work, it may
still result in a faster build in total at the cost of more memory. This
option is already the default when using `next experimental-compile` but
can now be used when `next build` is used also.
---------
Co-authored-by: Delba de Oliveira <32464864+delbaoliveira@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
## What?
Removes `experimental.appDir` this was leftover from when I flipped the
switch.
Kept the config file as in the future we might add future flags and
such. It also helps that it has the types comment included so you always
get types.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This adds a new client router filter for app paths and redirects so that
we correctly hard navigate when a transition for one of this paths is
encountered. This fixes the longstanding issue where redirects weren't
applied on the client so a redirect that matches a dynamic route as well
would transition to the dynamic route on client transition but not on
direct visit. Similarly this ensures we hard navigate to app paths from
pages even if a page dynamic route matches the path.
The specific filter leveraged here is a bloom filter as we can tolerate
some false matches (currently targeting an error rate of `2%`) as they
just trigger a hard navigation which should be acceptable and this also
avoids needing to send an entire manifest with the related paths.
We can leverage a manifest for the generated SSG paths as well in a
follow-up to fix `fallback: false` routes not being navigated correctly
on client-transition in some cases as well.
The filter is initially behind an `experimental.clientRouterFilter` flag
in `next.config.js` although this is auto-enabled when leveraging app
directory to ensure proper transitions.
fixes NEXT-609
closes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/46235
x-ref: [slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C035J346QQL/p1677028663246719)
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/41344
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/40062
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/37889
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/26426
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/35837
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/42812
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/43037
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This PR fixes the issue in which urls from appDir will always not be
found in production when built with `"output": "standalone"` by copying
.next/server/app and .next/server/app-paths-manifest.json into
.next/standalone/server.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Bailout to client rendering when using useSearchParams and usePathName
during SSG.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Make `useSelectedLayoutSegment` include the remaining segments from the current level to the leaf node.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Remove `browsersListForSwc` since it is enabled by default now, and disable `legacyBrowsers` by default.
This PR also bumps the default browserslist to the following:
- Chrome 64+
- Edge 79+
- Firefox 67+
- Opera 51+
- Safari 12+
See related RFC:
- Closes#33227
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
`config.experimental.serverComponents` is currently required to be
enabled or disabled together with `config.experimental.appDir` (which
means `serverComponents === appDir` otherwise it will throw) so there is
no reason to keep both of them. This PR removes `serverComponents` from
Next.js and only rely on `appDir` instead.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
In order to make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we
request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
This serves to add support for [Subresource
Integrity](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Subresource_Integrity)
hashes for scripts added from the new app directory. This also has
support for utilizing nonce values passed from request headers (expected
to be generated per request in middleware) in the bootstrapping scripts
via the `Content-Security-Policy` header as such:
```
Content-Security-Policy: script-src 'nonce-2726c7f26c'
```
Which results in the inline scripts having a new `nonce` attribute hash
added. These features combined support for setting an aggressive Content
Security Policy on scripts loaded.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
This ensures we properly leverage the `assetPrefix` for `app`. Note for reviewing the test changes are mostly spacing so hiding that may help.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes: [slack thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C035J346QQL/p1659387244559979)
## Client-side router for `app` directory
This PR implements the new router that leverages React 18 concurrent features like Suspense and startTransition.
It also integrates with React Server Components and builds on top of it to allow server-centric routing that only renders the part of the page that has to change.
It's one of the pieces of the implementation of https://nextjs.org/blog/layouts-rfc.
## Details
I'm going to document the differences with the current router here (will be reworked for the upgrade guide)
### Client-side cache
In the current router we have an in-memory cache for getStaticProps data so that if you prefetch and then navigate to a route that has been prefetched it'll be near-instant. For getServerSideProps the behavior is different, any navigation to a page with getServerSideProps fetches the data again.
In the new model the cache is a fundamental piece, it's more granular than at the page level and is set up to ensure consistency across concurrent renders. It can also be invalidated at any level.
#### Push/Replace (also applies to next/link)
The new router still has a `router.push` / `router.replace` method.
There are a few differences in how it works though:
- It only takes `href` as an argument, historically you had to provide `href` (the page path) and `as` (the actual url path) to do dynamic routing. In later versions of Next.js this is no longer required and in the majority of cases `as` was no longer needed. In the new router there's no way to reason about `href` vs `as` because there is no notion of "pages" in the browser.
- Both methods now use `startTransition`, you can wrap these in your own `startTransition` to get `isPending`
- The push/replace support concurrent rendering. When a render is bailed by clicking a different link to navigate to a completely different page that still works and doesn't cause race conditions.
- Support for optimistic loading states when navigating
##### Hard/Soft push/replace
Because of the client-side cache being reworked this now allows us to cover two cases: hard push and soft push.
The main difference between the two is if the cache is reused while navigating. The default for `next/link` is a `hard` push which means that the part of the cache affected by the navigation will be invalidated, e.g. if you already navigated to `/dashboard` and you `router.push('/dashboard')` again it'll get the latest version. This is similar to the existing `getServerSideProps` handling.
In case of a soft push (API to be defined but for testing added `router.softPush('/')`) it'll reuse the existing cache and not invalidate parts that are already filled in. In practice this means it's more like the `getStaticProps` client-side navigation because it does not fetch on navigation except if a part of the page is missing.
#### Back/Forward navigation
Back and Forward navigation ([popstate](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Window/popstate_event)) are always handled as a soft navigation, meaning that the cache is reused, this ensures back/forward navigation is near-instant when it's in the client-side cache. This will also allow back/forward navigation to be a high priority update instead of a transition as it is based on user interaction. Note: in this PR it still uses `startTransition` as there's no way to handle the high priority update suspending which happens in case of missing data in the cache. We're working with the React team on a solution for this particular case.
### Layouts
Note: this section assumes you've read [The layouts RFC](https://nextjs.org/blog/layouts-rfc) and [React Server Components RFC](https://reactjs.org/blog/2020/12/21/data-fetching-with-react-server-components.html)
React Server Components rendering leverages the Flight streaming mechanism in React 18, this allows sending a serializable representation of the rendered React tree on the server to the browser, the client-side React can use this serialized representation to render components client-side without the JavaScript being sent to the browser. This is one of the building blocks of Server Components. This allows a bunch of interesting features but for now I'll keep it to how it affects layouts.
When you have a `app/dashboard/layout.js` and `app/dashboard/page.js` the page will render as children of the layout, when you add another page like `app/dashboard/integrations/page.js` that page falls under the dashboard layout as well. When client-side navigating the new router automatically figures out if the page you're navigating to can be a smaller render than the whole page, in this case `app/dashboard/page.js` and `app/dashboard/integrations/page.js` share the `app/dashboard/layout.js` so instead of rendering the whole page we render below the layout component, this means the layout itself does not get re-rendered, the layout's `getServerSideProps` would not be called, and the Flight response would only hold the result of `app/dashboard/integrations/page.js`, effectively giving you the smallest patch for the UI.
---
Note: the commits in this PR were mostly work in progress to ensure it wasn't lost along the way. The implementation was reworked a bunch of times to where it is now.
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
