### What?
This test case was never passing and accidentally enabled for Turbopack.
We could disable the whole test suite, but since only one test case is
affected we can also disable only that one.
## What?
Currently we use the initial compile to add entrypoints that we know are
going to be used in the application. For example the Next.js runtime,
`react`, `react-dom`, and such. While this was the right default when
Next.js only had `pages`, it's no longer true when both `pages` and
`app` exist. E.g. when you're working on a page using App Router we'd
still compile `pages/_app`, `pages/_document`, and `pages/_error` even
though those would not be used. In case of larger applications (e.g.
Vercel's application) this would mean thousands of extra modules being
compiled even though you don't need them for the page you're looking at.
Similarly we'd compile the Next.js runtime for App Router even when
you're only using `pages`.
This PR changes the handling to only compile the entries that are needed
for the current set of visited pages (on-demand-entries). If that set
only includes `app` entrypoints then the `pages` related files will be
excluded. If the set contains both `app` and `pages` both will be
included. Similarly for `amp`, if you don't use `amp: true` / `amp:
hybrid` the development runtime will not be compiled.
📔 Note: This is specifically for webpack, Turbopack already compiles
everything needed lazily so it didn't have this limitation.
#### Before
```
- event compiled client and server successfully in 1079 ms (306 modules)
- event compiled client and server successfully in 155 ms (306 modules)
```
With opening `/`:
```
- event compiled client and server successfully in 1118 ms (306 modules)
- event compiled client and server successfully in 157 ms (306 modules)
- event compiled client and server successfully in 599 ms (486 modules)
```
Total: 1.874ms (Note: This number is much higher when `pages/_app`
imports many modules).
#### After
```
- event compiled client and server successfully in 118 ms (20 modules)
- event compiled client and server successfully in 65 ms (20 modules)
```
📔 Note: opening the page then causes the Next.js / React runtime to be
compiled ofcourse
```
- event compiled client and server successfully in 115 ms (20 modules)
- event compiled client and server successfully in 57 ms (20 modules)
- event compiled client and server successfully in 1137 ms (361 modules)
```
Total: 1.309ms (Note: This number is not affected by`pages/_app`
importing many modules).
## How?
We can only apply this optimization after we've looped over the list of
on-demand entries, as that has the required metadata. Hence why I went
with deleting the keys for each respective type of entrypoint (`pages`,
`app`, `amp`).
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This breaks up some of our longest running tests which allows more
parallelizing of the tests. This also moves turbopack tests filtering
back to an allow list as it is running a lot of unrelated tests
currently which isn't ideal. We should only be running against tests
that are explicitly testing turbopack e.g. build tests should not be
duplicated in the turbopack group.
```sh
test/integration/css/test/group-1.test.js: 762.655
test/integration/edge-runtime-module-errors/test/index.test.js: 695.309
test/integration/css/test/group-2.test.js: 671.848
test/integration/i18n-support/test/index.test.js: 518.173
test/integration/scss-modules/test/index.test.js: 451.704
test/integration/css-features/test/index.test.js: 417.318
test/integration/css-modules/test/index.test.js: 403.405
test/integration/eslint/test/index.test.js: 381.563
test/integration/500-page/test/index.test.js: 371.134
test/integration/telemetry/test/index.test.js: 367.691
test/development/acceptance-app/ReactRefreshLogBox.test.ts: 335.878
test/integration/create-next-app/templates.test.ts: 334.01
test/integration/scss/test/group-2.test.js: 327.255
test/integration/scss/test/group-1.test.js: 318.574
test/integration/edge-runtime-configurable-guards/test/index.test.js: 313.834
test/e2e/instrumentation-hook/instrumentation-hook.test.ts: 294.618
test/development/acceptance-app/error-recovery.test.ts: 283.355
test/e2e/app-dir/app/vercel-speed-insights.test.ts: 278.242
test/integration/create-next-app/index.test.ts: 272.442
```
## Problem
Relative hash/query handling in `next/link` (e.g. `<Link
href="#hello">`) is broken in App Router, especially if you're on a
nested route.
This wasn't a problem in `/pages` because the href always get fully
resolved in `<NextLink>`; i.e. if you have `<Link href="#hash" />` on
`/hello`, it'll resolve the href to `/hello#hash` and use that
everywhere.
However, in App Router, `<Link>` no longer uses the current location to
resolve the href:
5451564f36/packages/next/src/client/link.tsx (L450-L457)
Therefore navigating with `new URL(href, location.origin)` will skip the
current path and always apply the relative hash/query to the _root_
route:
5451564f36/packages/next/src/client/components/app-router.tsx (L208-L215)
## Solution
Not 100% sure if this is the best solution, but since `app-router` is
already reading `window.location`, I'm using `location.href` as the base
URL to resolve the href.
I grep'd for `location.origin` and checked other callsites; seems like
only `app-router` deals with user specified hrefs.
Fixes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/42157 &
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/44139, and potentially
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/48554 and
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/22838
## Test Plan
```
pnpm testheadless test/e2e/app-dir/navigation
```
---------
This adds new `build and test` and `build and deploy` workflows in favor
of the existing massive `build, test, and deploy` workflow. Since the
new workflows will use `pull_request_target` this waits to remove the
existing workflow until the new one is tested.
While testing this new workflow flakey behavior in tests have also been
addressed. Along with the new workflow we will also be leveraging new
runners which allow us to run tests against the production binary of
`next-swc` so this avoids slight differences in tests we've seen due to
running against the dev binary.
Furthermore we will have a new flow for allowing workflow runs on PRs
from external forks which will either require a comment be checking a
box approving the run after each change or a label added by the team.
The new flow also no longer relies on `actions/cache` or similar which
have proven to be pretty unreliable.
Tests runs with the new workflow can be seen here
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/actions/runs/5100673508/jobs/9169416949
Since the static metadata routes should always be static that can be
optimized, they should be marked as default runtime (or basically no
runtime). This PR change the runtime detection, if it's a static
metadata route file, its runtime will be erased.
So that it won't be picked up by `edge-app-route-loader` and then by
`next-image-loader` which emits the unexpected static file
Fixes NEXT-1238
If using Server Actions on the client layer without enabling the
`serverActions` feature, the build should error. Add a test case to
ensure #50199 works.
### What?
This reverts commit 6ebc725fe6 / #50247.
### Why?
#49972 is reverted due to bugs, and I'm retrying it.
### How?
Closes WEB-1072
Closes WEB-1097
Closes NEXT-1156 (as it's reopened by the revert PR)
fix#48469
---------
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
### What?
Implement a CJS optimizer for next-swc
### Why?
x-ref: https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C02HY34AKME/p1684341093462309
Assuming most CJS files are transpiled from ESM, we can mimic
tree-shaking using an AST transform.
### How?
Closes WEB-1072
Fixes#48469
fix NEXT-1156
---------
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
Fix react and react-dom aliases are not properly set for `pages/`
* Remove alias react-dom internals to `{}` in edge runtime as we're using server rendering stub as alias
* Add `react$`, `react-dom$` missing aliases
* Only apply alias to builtin react/react-dom when it's app dir assets.
* Add `react|react-dom/package.json` resolving to require-hook
* Fix hmr issue that sometimes it will perform a reload when a hard navigation is triggered
Currently the edge runtime does not support static generation so this adds a warning when `force-static` is leveraged with `edge-runtime` as it will cause unexpected behavior. Support is being investigated so this isn't a hard error at the moment.
x-ref: [slack thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03S8ED1DKM/p1684783403551589)
## What?
After landing #49855 I found a few more edge cases with not-found not
behaving as expected:
- When navigating directly to a not-found page (e.g. `/testabc`) the
error boundary would not reset as there were multiple levels being
triggered at the same time.
- When running in production navigating back/forward to the not found
page caused the page to become empty
Both issues are fixed by this PR. I've added tests for both.
## How?
- Ensures `asNotFound` is not set on the layout-router, it causes all
levels to trigger not-found, even though only app-router needs it
- Ensures navigations to 404 are always a mpaNavigation (browser
navigation) instead of trying to do a client-side navigation (mirrors
what we do in `pages`)
Fixes NEXT-1209
Fixes NEXT-1218
Fixes#49823
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
client refs are not correctly extracted as we're using regex to get the exports names from cjs file. The regex was extracting some bad names from the code source, this PR fixes the regex to make sure they extract the correct content
Fixes NEXT-1213
As explained in the comments, the `cookies()` API is a mix of request and response cookies. For `.get()` methods, we want to return the request cookie if it exists. For mutative methods like `.set()`, we return the response cookie type instead.
fix#50049
fix NEXT-1211
Currently the suffix logic is for pages so nothing happens in app dir. This PR changes it to **always** apply the `createSuffixStream(closeTag)` transform, to defer `</body></html>` to the end of the stream.
fix#48372
fix NEXT-1200
* Adding default metadata to root not found under root layout
* Refactor the tests a bit, previously it only checks if the text existed in html, it actually exisits in flight response
Fixes#49979
Closes NEXT-1207
For static member expressions like `foo.bar`, we currently treat it as one whole Ident `foo.bar` and pass it over the `$$bound` array as one value. That causes a problem where the Ident inside the function body needs to be converted, because it can no longer access to `foo`.
Closes#49985.
fix NEXT-1206
## What?
@steven-tey noticed that on upstash.com that scrolling to hash keeps
happening regardless of the hash being set:
- Open site
- Click `Pricing` which adds `#pricing` and scrolls to the
`id="pricing"`
- Click `About`
- Click on the logo
You'll notice that navigating back to the homepage ends up scrolling to
the `id="pricing` instead of to the top of the page.
## How?
This happened because we didn't reset the `hashFragment` and
`segmentPaths` for scrolling when scroll was applied, which means it
would keep that value in the state and would be applied as such on
navigation.
This PR ensures that besides setting `apply` to `false` we also reset
the `hashFragment` and `segmentPaths`.
Fixes NEXT-1205
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This PR fixes a warning that previous looked like the following:
```
Warning: fetch for [object Request] specified "cache: default" and "revalidate: 60", only one should be specified.
```
## What?
Currently the error boundary state does not reset when a navigation
happens because the `key` does not change. Because of that navigating
using next/link when the error boundary is in the open state ends up not
rendering the contents of the new navigation, instead it keeps the error
boundary contents.
## How?
This PR uses a pattern that is recommended in the React docs (setState
during render) to reset the error boundary if the `usePathname` value
has changed, it is used as a proxy for a new navigation.
Fixes#47862
Fixes NEXT-963
Fixes#49736Fixes#49732Fixes#49599
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
metadataBase is using `process.env.PORT` to construct a host when there's no `metadataBase` specified in layout. Dev server needs to pass down the PORT env from the parent prcoess.
Fixes#49807Fixes#49859Closes#49889
Now that the beta docs have been merged into stable with the release of
13.4, this updates all links as some paths have changed due to
redirects.
---------
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Co-authored-by: Tobias Koppers <tobias.koppers@googlemail.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This PR changes `useParams` to return all dynamic params present in the
tree as opposed to only those on the canonical/URL path
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
link NEXT-1108
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
Follow-up to https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/49628 this updates
the `export const fetchCache` handling and `cache: 'no-store'` handling
as discussed which also aligns with our docs here
https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/file-conventions/route-segment-config#fetchcache
- `export const fetchCache = 'force-cache'`: forces all fetches to be
cached regardless of `cache: 'no-store'` but cacheable `revalidate`
values still take priority
- `export const fetchCache = 'default-cache'`: ensures fetches are
cached even if they come after a `cache: 'no-store'` fetch but don't
override `cache: 'no-store'` itself.
- without `export const fetchCache`, we still disable fetch cache for
successive fetches after a fetch that does `cache: 'no-store'`
x-ref: [slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03KAR5DCKC/p1683732826894469)
The `pathname` in app-render was actually "page" (e.g. `/blog/[slug]`),
with special url conventions. Instead we should use actual request url
as pathname. Rename previous `pathname` arg to `pagePath` for better
readability
Also improved the url validation
