389c77f205
Resubmitting this PR following this comment from Tim. This work has been done already and we can build off of it to get this in faster. > Just to be clear we're planning to rework create-next-app to give you the option to choose between JavaScript or TypeScript so it'll solve this request. For `app` right now it'll stay TypeScript till that is implemented. > > _Originally posted by @timneutkens in https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/41745#discussioncomment-3985833_ --- I added the `--ts, --typescript` flag to `create-next-app` in https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/24655, and since then I have seen it used very frequently, including in recent issues (such as https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/33314) and most Next.js tutorials on YouTube. I noticed the template logic added in this PR was also used to add the `appDir` configuration as well. We discussed a while ago adding the following user flow: - `create-next-app --js, --javascript` creates a JS project - `create-next-app --ts, --typescript` creates a TS project - `create-next-app [name]` (no `--js, --ts`) prompts the user to choose either JS or TS, with TS selected by default. ### Review Adding support for appDir and refactoring the templates brought the pain-of-review up a bit, but it's not so bad when broken into increments. The original 8-file diff is here:1f47d9b0bfAnd the PR that brought the diff up to 59 files (mostly owed to `app` template dirs and file structure refactors):bd3ae4afd3([PR link](https://github.com/ctjlewis/next.js/pull/3/files)) ### Demo https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1657236/198586216-4691ff4c-48d4-4c6c-b7c1-705c38dd0194.mov Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
3 lines
40 B
JSON
3 lines
40 B
JSON
{
|
|
"extends": "next/core-web-vitals"
|
|
}
|