rsnext/packages/eslint-plugin-next/lib/rules/google-font-display.js
Joost De Cock 34dcede690
fix(eslint-plugin-next): Broken links in eslint output (#32837)
This fixes broken links in the eslint output by removing the trailing full stop.
It also makes the formatting of (the output of) the various rules consistent.

## Documentation / Examples

- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `yarn lint`

> I don't think this is a bug, nor a feature, nor is it really documentation. 
> It's just a small nuisance that I bumped into and felt compelled to fix.
> I went with documentation as that seems the closest match

## What does this pull request do?

The elslint output of `eslint-plugin-next` contains useful links to the documentation about the various rules.
Unfortunately, on most (but not all) rules, those links are immediately followed by a full stop (`.`).

The terminal (or any parser) has no way of knowing that the full stop is not part of the URL. 
So it includes it and clicking the link leads to a 404 on the nextjs.org website.
 
![eslint](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1708494/147452577-43ad4ce7-df75-4d48-ab78-70b9b8212b7e.png)

This PR fixes that by removing the full stop. 

## But a final full stop is better grammar

I considered alternatives (such as [a zero-width space character](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-width_space#Prohibited_in_URLs)) in case the final full stop was part of the style guide or something.

However, as I went through the eslint rules, I notices that the messages for various rules were formatted inconsistently. 
Some with final full stop, some without.

As such, I made the all consistent with this structure:

> [message]. See: [url]

I feel this is a better solution than using the zero-width space as these sort of invisible characters 
in code can be a red flag that something fishy is going on.

I submit this pull request in the hope it will be useful, and a positive contribution to a project I have a great deal of appreciation for.
That being said, I fully understand if people would consider this a non-issue.
2021-12-28 02:18:39 +00:00

57 lines
1.5 KiB
JavaScript

const NodeAttributes = require('../utils/node-attributes.js')
module.exports = {
meta: {
docs: {
description:
'Ensure correct font-display property is assigned for Google Fonts',
recommended: true,
url: 'https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/google-font-display',
},
},
create: function (context) {
return {
JSXOpeningElement(node) {
let message
if (node.name.name !== 'link') {
return
}
const attributes = new NodeAttributes(node)
if (!attributes.has('href') || !attributes.hasValue('href')) {
return
}
const hrefValue = attributes.value('href')
const isGoogleFont =
typeof hrefValue === 'string' &&
hrefValue.startsWith('https://fonts.googleapis.com/css')
if (isGoogleFont) {
const params = new URLSearchParams(hrefValue.split('?')[1])
const displayValue = params.get('display')
if (!params.has('display')) {
message = 'Display parameter is missing.'
} else if (
displayValue === 'block' ||
displayValue === 'fallback' ||
displayValue === 'auto'
) {
message = `${
displayValue[0].toUpperCase() + displayValue.slice(1)
} behavior is not recommended.`
}
}
if (message) {
context.report({
node,
message: `${message} See: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/google-font-display`,
})
}
},
}
},
}