rsnext/packages
Tim Neutkens 8ab38cef41
Improve compile time on large application (#50792)
## What?

While investigating slow compilation for a page on vercel.com in
development I found that there was close to 10 seconds of time
unaccounted for in `.next/trace`. Ran a profile and found that time was
spent in watchpack `batch`, specifically calling `close` many times.
When I tried to debug this further by running unbundled webpack I
noticed the same issue didn't exists.

### Before

<img width="1329" alt="Before"
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/6324199/9ace4628-db04-4de7-993f-65aef9dffc55">

### After

<img width="1278" alt="After"
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/6324199/55d5e58b-4a27-4235-8dea-723a7a78c117">

## Raw numbers

<table>
<tr>
 <td>Before</td>
 <td>After</td>
 <td>Delta</td>
 <td>Delta (percent)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
 <td>13840 ms</td>
 <td>3580 ms</td>
 <td>-10260 ms</td>
  <td>-74.13%</td>
</tr>
</table>

## How?

Investigated further and found that specifically not minifying watchpack
solved the issue.

<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:

## For Contributors

### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples

- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md

### Fixing a bug

- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md

### Adding a feature

- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md



## For Maintainers

- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change

### What?

### Why?

### How?

Closes NEXT-
Fixes #

-->
2023-06-05 15:05:54 +02:00
..
create-next-app v13.4.5-canary.5 2023-06-05 07:18:40 +00:00
eslint-config-next v13.4.5-canary.5 2023-06-05 07:18:40 +00:00
eslint-plugin-next v13.4.5-canary.5 2023-06-05 07:18:40 +00:00
font v13.4.5-canary.5 2023-06-05 07:18:40 +00:00
next Improve compile time on large application (#50792) 2023-06-05 15:05:54 +02:00
next-bundle-analyzer v13.4.5-canary.5 2023-06-05 07:18:40 +00:00
next-codemod v13.4.5-canary.5 2023-06-05 07:18:40 +00:00
next-env v13.4.5-canary.5 2023-06-05 07:18:40 +00:00
next-mdx v13.4.5-canary.5 2023-06-05 07:18:40 +00:00
next-plugin-storybook v13.4.5-canary.5 2023-06-05 07:18:40 +00:00
next-polyfill-module v13.4.5-canary.5 2023-06-05 07:18:40 +00:00
next-polyfill-nomodule v13.4.5-canary.5 2023-06-05 07:18:40 +00:00
next-swc v13.4.5-canary.5 2023-06-05 07:18:40 +00:00
react-dev-overlay v13.4.5-canary.5 2023-06-05 07:18:40 +00:00
react-refresh-utils v13.4.5-canary.5 2023-06-05 07:18:40 +00:00