ceb028a469
This PR makes `typedRoutes` stricter by constraining generics in `Route` to type string. I've also made generating types for routes a bit more efficient by moving `redirects` and `rewrites`'s processing to the plugin's constructor since `rewrites` and `redirects` don't change in both dev and prod. I've also been trying to fix a bug where route types doesn't generate all the routes (some appear, some don't), but I've got no clues since that doesn't seem easy to reproduce (perhaps it only happens in my case?) ## Bug - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] Integration tests added - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md) ## Feature - [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. - [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added - [ ] Documentation added - [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md) ## Documentation / Examples - [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint` - [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md) |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| src | ||
| app-types.test.js | ||
| next.config.js | ||
| package.json | ||
| tsconfig.json | ||