## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
## Why the change
I lost quite a few hours figuring out why my environment variable was `undefined` in the browser.
I read about the built-in support and was like: "Oh nice" and didn't read much further. I missed the part about how you need to prefix your variables with `NEXT_PUBLIC_` in order to expose them to the browser.
I think a hint to this in the anchor link to that section will make it more discoverable as it's then mentioned near the top and will save people who are like me some time and a headache.
This ensures we don't recommend editing the `next-env` file since we need to be able to tweak it to accept future types we add in Next.js
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
Closes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/26533
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Incorporates some of the feedback we've had about this doc.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Noticed a few things off in the Script docs—for example, the "before" variant should show using a non-React Component `<script>` tag, & the capitalization was inconsistent in a few places.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
Since #24655 landed in 10.2.1, I wanted to update the documentation, especially for the top Google results for "next typescript", so that users know how to create a TS project.
Please feel free to change anything you feel is appropriate.
1. Stable version of TypeScript 4.3 just released, replaced beta version tag with stable version v4.3.2.
2. Add reference article explaining about the performance improvement.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
This makes sure to mention the default revalidate value is `false` or to not revalidate since it previously only mentions it's optional.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
This PR changes the `GetServerSidePropsResult` type to require that it returns a `props` object. The docs mention it's required even for a redirect/notFound, and it throws and error if it's not returned.
From the docs:
> props - A required object with the props that will be received by the page component. It should be a serializable object
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Based on user feedback, this clarifies the difference between rewrites and redirects, as well as follows the new pattern for showing version history with a collapsible table.
This updates this initial PR here https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/18146 to resolve merge conflicts and updates tests since we aren't able to update that PR itself.
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
Closes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/18146
As far as I know `notFound` supports use cases like a post getting permanently removed from CMS (thus should not exist on the webpage anymore) without a redeploy.
If the above statement is correct I believe this should be mentioned in the docs as it seems like a common use case and quite a few questions about this are floating around in the GitHub Discussions too.
This is a one-line commit, which adds the missing import for VisuallyHidden component, from Reach UI, to the CSS documentation in the Dialog component example.
This pull request **temporarily** removes ESLint, as it was not landed in accordance with our standard experimental policies. We are fully committed to landing this change again.
This is being reverted because:
- Next.js has very strict goals for its install size. This feature resulted in adding over 17MB, or a 43.6% increase.
- The feature was not first landed under the `experimental` key in `next.config.js`, rather, it was added under the stable namespace (top-level)
- Using the feature doesn't do a "guided setup" like TypeScript, it should ask you to "bring your own" dependencies for ESLint
- It uses a undesirable ESLint plugin name: `plugin:@next/next/recommended`. This should read out as strictly `next`, or as short as we can get it.
- Does not provide actionable warnings (missing link to resolve issue)
- Does not follow appropriate console output styling. We need to revisit how these are presented.
To re-land this, we need to ensure the following minimums are met:
- Very minor change in install size
- Fully experimental (i.e. flagged) with warnings
- Finalized package name and configuration shape, preferably so we can do ` { extends: 'next' } `.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
For #22228
This PR:
- Adds ESLint to toolchain
- Included by default for builds (`next build`)
- Can be enabled for development (`next dev`)
- Custom formatter built for output
- Adds appropriate tests
- Adds two documentation pages
Following commit 1f5c2c8513
Adding documentation links to example.
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [X ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x ] Make sure the linting passes
