This PR fixes `.eslintrc.json` not being created after the user runs
`next lint` and selects an option of `Strict` or `Base`.
The reason is that the lint check was looking for `pages` and
`src/pages` only. Added `app` and `src/app` to be checked also.
Fixes: #55094Fixes: #55102
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
### What?
Fixes `setAssetPrefix` when running on a custom server using next()
function
### Why?
Looks like when we run next custom server, there are 2 instances created
to handle this case
* main server in `/server/next.ts`
* and Render server `./server/lib/render-server.ts`
The issue mainly happens when calling `setAssetPrefix` it will update
only the main server and not render server
``` javascript
const next = require('next')
const app = next({ });
app.setAssetPrefix('my-fancy-cdn/static');
app.render(); // render server is used instead of the main server
```
### How?
when calling `setAssetPrefix` on the main server also update the render
server with the same information.
Fixes: #59940Fixes: #51223Fixes: #61383
### Related Resources
#53523#49805c9c6ff6d77/docs/03-pages/01-building-your-application/06-configuring/10-custom-server.mdx
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
### What
This PR attempts to adjust import map to `server-only` / `client-only`
close to the existing webpack configs, makes to pass more tests.
Closes PACK-2396
### What?
This PR adds JSDoc comments to the most common public APIs to improve
the DX in IDEs like VSCode.
### Why?
Currently, we provide no information on some of the most used APIs in
IDEs, which makes it harder than it needs to be to look up the extra
information.
<details>
<summary><b>Before:</b></summary>
<img
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/18369201/8b6092e8-8f9b-49da-a3df-b07a59982069"
width="640"/>
</details>
<details>
<summary><b>After:</b></summary>
<img
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/18369201/30216f76-414a-43b0-9aa6-2fdd742ab3fe"
width="640"/>
</details>
### How?
Using JSDoc comments, I added a basic description to most public APIs
that link back to the current docs for more details. The description is
kept minimal to avoid out-of-sync documentation.
Note: In the future, the flow could be reversed here, and our API
Reference docs could actually be generated from a single source of
truth, the source code itself. However, this will require more work by
re-organizing our public API submodules in a single directory, (related
#61525), so the API docs are easy to maintain even without a deeper
knowledge of the codebase.
Note: These comments should also be extended to
methods/properties/arguments in these public APIs in the future.
Closes NEXT-2357
[Slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03KAR5DCKC/p1706735292633029)
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
### What?
Issue - Docs: Duplicated code snippets
The code snippet is repeated, second snippet had to be with Link
component.
### How?
Replaced button with Link component.
Fixes#61434 - Docs: Duplicated code snippets
---------
Co-authored-by: Lee Robinson <me@leerob.io>
Co-authored-by: Sam Ko <sam@vercel.com>
### What?
Removing `autoprefixer` from the default Tailwind CSS templates. (It can
be installed afterward)
### Why?
After some investigation by @timneutkens, `autoprefixer` seems to
introduce some compilation overhead
### How?
Removing `autoprefixer` from the auto-installed dependency list, it
would be up to the developer to install this plugin if they need it.
[Slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C04DUD7EB1B/p1695288906722539)
See here for additional context
https://github.com/vercel/edge-runtime/pull/795 but TLDR is due to a bug
in the `npmcli` we aren't able to publish Next.js releases after this
package was upgraded.
We can re-land the upgrade after that PR is landed/published.
Reverts vercel/next.js#61030
Closes NEXT-2367
### What?
Expose the `MiddlewareConfig` interface.
### Why?
You can now `import type { MiddlewareConfig } from "next/server"` to
type the `config` object in your `middleware.ts` file.
Now you an type the entire file for example like so:
```ts
// middleware.ts
import type { NextMiddleware, MiddlewareConfig } from "next/server"
export const middleware: NextMiddleware = async (req) => {
//...
}
export const config: MiddlewareConfig = {
//...
}
```
### How?
Re-exported the interface from its current location via
`server/web/types`, to colocate it with `NextMidldeware`.
I wonder if we could somehow type this file automatically, but it might
be dependent on https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/38511
Closes NEXT-2308
[Slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03S9JCH2Q5/p1706287433026409?thread_ts=1706058855.423019&cid=C03S9JCH2Q5),
[Slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03KAR5DCKC/p1706659724141899)
## Improving Documentation
### The following changes have been made to the official repository's
**Readme.md**:
- Shortened link text across the readme.
- Added additional descriptions for more details.
- Added bold text to highlight emphasis on important topics
- Changed heading sizes to indicate first headings (h1) for each section
instead of second headings (h2) which was previously being used
- Merged _'Who is using Next.js?'_ section with _'Getting Started'_
section for a more professional, cleaner look.
### The following changes have been made to the repository's
**Contribution docs**:
- Fixed two typos in the docs
---------
Co-authored-by: Sam Ko <sam@vercel.com>
Co-authored-by: Delba de Oliveira <32464864+delbaoliveira@users.noreply.github.com>
### What?
Enhancement of _with-supabase example_. Replacing in **middelware.ts**,
**supabase.auth.getSession()** with **supabase.auth.getUser()**
### Why?
**Never trust supabase.auth.getSession() inside server code such as
middleware**. It isn't guaranteed to revalidate the Auth token.
**It's safe to trust getUser()** because it sends a request to the
Supabase Auth server every time to revalidate the Auth token.
[Setting up Server-Side Auth for
Next.js](https://supabase.com/docs/guides/auth/server-side/nextjs)
fixes#61390
### What?
Added encodeURIComponent to encode revalidateTag value beforing
appending it to the url.
### Why?
If a tag contains special characters the tag wont be revalidated because
the special characters arent encoded.
By encoding the tag any special characters can be used.
Check out issue #61390 for further explanation
I believe this is the reason why users report the revalidateTag as
unreliable. They might be using special characters in their tags to make
sure they are unique, but when deployed to vercel and the fetch cache is
used revalidateTag fail to revalidate them.
### How?
By encoding revalidateTag with encodeURIcomponent the tag can contain
special characters.
Closes NEXT-
Fixes#61390
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Seems https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/61641 also did not resolve
the `npm publish` error so going to upgrade to latest version as well as
we pinned to a previous major.
Closes NEXT-2354
Added Kinde to the authentication documentation, Its already mentioned
elsewhere in the docs just not here.
Co-authored-by: Lee Robinson <me@leerob.io>
### What?
Adds another `ImportMappingReplacement` for the font file in order to
add markers to the filename.
The markers are used to generate the `next-font-manifest.json` (and also
in next.js code).
Closes PACK-2352
### What
When attaching a rejection listener to a server action promise, in the case of network errors, the rejection handler would be skipped and it'd throw an error that crashes the application.
### Why
When we refactored these reducers to no longer suspend, it caused the rejection handling logic we have to no longer make sense. In this case we're working with a native promise that won't have a `status` property, so we'd re-throw the error and not call `reject`.
### How
This removes the special status handling logic and makes the rejection handler always call `reject` with the error. This will either be handled by user code or let the error bubble to an error boundary.
I also cleaned up some mutable code that is no longer needed now that these reducers aren't replayed.
Closes NEXT-1715
Closes NEXT-2323
Fixes#58638
This PR consolidates how we inject specific, custom ecma transforms for
the each context.
Previously we had 2 different way to apply custom transforms via
ecmatransform plugin / custom rules, but it could create some conflict
in order as well as can be confusing between how it gets created. PR
uses new moduleruleeffect instead, consolidates all of the references
into single way.
Closes PACK-2342
Fixing a simple case sensitivity error in the import statement,
"storeProvider" should be "StoreProvider".
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
