In other output modes, link and script tags do not contain a crossorigin
attribute by default.
When using output: "export", it should also follow the other output
modes, to avoid unnecessary CORS issues, especially when hosting the
assets on a different domain (i.e. a CDN).
fixes#61210
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
To reproduce:
- go to https://next.new/
- run `next build`
- it breaks
```sh
~/projects/nextjs-pdjpmx
❯ npm install && npx next dev
added 328 packages in 6s
116 packages are looking for funding
run `npm fund` for details
▲ Next.js 14.1.0
- Local: http://localhost:3000
Downloading swc package @next/swc-wasm-nodejs...
✓ Ready in 5.7s
○ Compiling / ...
✓ Compiled / in 9.2s (510 modules)
✓ Compiled in 483ms (240 modules)
^C
~/projects/nextjs-pdjpmx 27s
❯ npx next build
▲ Next.js 14.1.0
Creating an optimized production build ...
> Build error occurred
TypeError: process.stdout._handle.setBlocking is not a function
at loadBindings (file:///home/projects/nextjs-pdjpmx/node_modules/next/dist/build/swc/index.js:231:32)
at getBaseWebpackConfig (file:///home/projects/nextjs-pdjpmx/node_modules/next/dist/build/webpack-config.js:333:37)
at eval (file:///home/projects/nextjs-pdjpmx/node_modules/next/dist/build/webpack-build/impl.js:140:40)
at async Span.traceAsyncFn (file:///home/projects/nextjs-pdjpmx/node_modules/next/dist/trace/trace.js:151:20)
at async webpackBuildImpl (file:///home/projects/nextjs-pdjpmx/node_modules/next/dist/build/webpack-build/impl.js:133:21)
at async Object.workerMain (file:///home/projects/nextjs-pdjpmx/node_modules/next/dist/build/webpack-build/impl.js:313:20) {
type: 'TypeError'
}
```
fixes#61848
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This PR reverts part of #61877 passing an absolute path to the distDir
value when running `next lint`.
Fixes#62796
Co-authored-by: Sam Ko <sam@vercel.com>
These tests were added back when the router would suspend in reducers,
primarily to test that things were working as expected during concurrent
rendering. Now that we don't suspend in reducers, most of these tests
aren't actually adding much value, and instead introduce friction
anytime we want to change the router state since they're currently
relying on snapshotting.
Before removing these tests, I verified that we have a corresponding e2e
test that covers the expected behaviors more explicitly. Specifically:
- `test/e2e/app-dir/actions` (server actions)
- `test/e2e/app-dir/navigation` (navigation tests & router.refresh)
- `test/e2e/app-dir/app-client-cache` and
`test/e2e/app-dir/app-prefetch` (prefetch & router cache behavior)
- `test/e2e/app-dir/router-autoscroll` (navigation auto-scrolling
behavior)
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Closes NEXT-2669
Reverting this experimental flag as it should not be used and we are
going to investigate experimenting with this further upstream so that it
can be done properly.
This reverts commit 2bdcaa0fda.
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/62668
Closes NEXT-2689
### What
Align with original route loader, explicitly throw on invalid handler
import.
This does not fixes test currently - other failures on the specific test
need to be solved.
Closes PACK-2652
As mentioned in the new-added error messages, and the [linked
resources](https://react.dev/reference/react/use-server#:~:text=Because%20the%20underlying%20network%20calls%20are%20always%20asynchronous%2C%20%27use%20server%27%20can%20only%20be%20used%20on%20async%20functions.):
> Because the underlying network calls are always asynchronous, 'use
server' can only be used on async functions.
> https://react.dev/reference/react/use-server
It's a requirement that only async functions are allowed to be exported
and annotated with `'use server'`. Currently, we already have compiler
check so this will already error:
```js
'use server'
export function foo () {} // missing async
```
However, since exported values can be very dynamic the compiler can't
catch all mistakes like that. We also have a runtime check for all
exports in a `'use server'` function, but it only covers `typeof value
=== 'function'`.
This PR adds a stricter check for "use server" annotated values to also
make sure they're async functions (`value.constructor.name ===
'AsyncFunction'`).
That said, there are still cases like synchronously returning a promise
to make a function "async", but it's still very different by definition.
For example:
```js
const f = async () => { throw 1; return 1 }
const g = () => { throw 1; return Promise.resolve(1) }
```
Where `g()` can be synchronously caught (`try { g() } catch {}`) but
`f()` can't even if they have the same types. If we allow `g` to be a
Server Action, this behavior is no longer always true but depending on
where it's called (server or client).
Closes#62727.
### What?
* upgrades turbopack for `getResolve` in webpack loaders
* add missing resolve-url-loader to turbopack for full sass support
Closes PACK-2634
Previously, errors shown in the error overlay, these stir were left
untraced through source maps.
Test Plan: `TURBOPACK=1 pnpm test-dev
test/development/app-render-error-log/app-render-error-log.test.ts`
Closes PACK-2608
## Description
Refactor the [Next.js
CLI](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/next-cli) to use
[commander](https://github.com/tj/commander.js) instead of
[arg](https://github.com/vercel/arg).
## Why?
- Auto-generated, properly formatted help command + output. With `arg`,
much of the help commands were manually added via a single
`console.log`, causing deviations over time.
- Ergonomic, ease of adding new subcommands and rules
## Breaking Changes
- Update the experimental `next experimental-compile` and `next
experimental-generate` build commands in favor of `next build
--experimental-build-mode=compile/generate`
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
### What?
Removes an extra word from an error message
### Why?
It bothered me
### How?
I opened it in VS Code and removed it
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
## What?
Working on fixing `test/e2e/conflicting-app-page-error`, this adds a
compiler error for the case where App Router routes conflict with Pages
Router routes. It's not 1:1 the same error as in webpack because in the
webpack version we hijacked the App Router resolving logic to assume
there's a certain set of paths, where Turbopack has the full route to
route tree resolving implementation which doesn't assume there's a
single page that can be resolved.
The tests are updated to reflect this change.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Closes NEXT-2592
## What?
Adds handling for issues that are emitted during the entrypoints
subscription, before the changes in this PR any issue (i.e. compiler
errors) that was emitted during the collection of which entrypoints
exist in the application were ignored.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Closes NEXT-2591
### What?
- Use `button` instead of `span` to allow keyboard navigation
- match tabindex with other items in the overlay to include it in the
natural focus sequence
- the style is kept, but we might need a better contrasting icon for the
dark background
- use same file conventions with existing files
- match file casing
- move icons to the `icons` folder
- Improve PseudoHtml internal docs
- use code guards ``` for code snippets
- drop the `any` type (long-term, we really should disallow `any` types)
Closes NEXT-2657
### What
Keep improving the hydration erros. Currently we divide the hydration
mismatch types into two categories, html tag mismatch and text mismatch.
We're displaying the mismatched text content between server and client
here since we have it in the component stack and warnings.
We've already made some improvements in #62590 , here we carry on
improving the highlited text into red and bold that is much easier for
you to spot on.
This updated a few long snapshots that we could collapse and show only
the text content difference instead of all the component stack.
### Screenshots
(Dark and light modes)
#### Mismatch html tags
<img width="360"
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/4800338/f721b374-69cc-4600-a09d-bef87e885fab"><img
width="360"
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/4800338/1abf2572-2be8-4359-a652-8ba39aaccfd3">
#### Mismatch text content
<img width="360"
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/4800338/7f0d2215-8bc0-4fba-9c92-6c44efa29531"><img
width="360"
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/4800338/656d1e1a-3157-4bcf-a239-74bb81fcb4c4">
#### Large content mismatch
### Why
I was intended to bring a html diff between server and client html
content but turns out the diff result could be giant and not ideal due
to few reasons. So we switched to the path of leveraging component stack
and mismatch contents.
React reordering the tags after hydration. For instance the `script` or
`link` tags could be hoist by React Float, so the lines of html is are
to preserved. so the diff is hard to be super accurate unless your
mismatch is small. If you're mismatch a component with rich html
content, it could be a pretty large diff.
Another case is if you have a bad nesting html like `<p> ...<span>...
<p>my text</p> ...</span>... <p>` where there're many span in between,
the final different could also be hudge as browser will close the first
`<p>` tag and the rest content will go into the diff. Hence we're going
with the component and text content diff.
Closes NEXT-2645
### What?
We now keep track of all client assets emitted for each route in
`ClientAssetMapper` and remove all issues associated with them when a
route get deleted.
Fixes#61384
Closes PACK-2487
## What?
#62528 caused test/e2e/app-dir/not-found/conflict-route to fail
compilation in Turbopack, this compiler error was previously already
reported by Turbopack but Next.js didn't show it, which #62528 resolved.
This PR changes the handling for the not-found handling to be consistent
between development and build, which ensures that the "special" page no
longer conflicts with app/not-found/page.js.
Closes NEXT-2617
Note: this is a reworked iteration of
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/62585 which wasn't sufficient.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
### What?
Do not fail when `useSelectedLayoutSegment` or
`useSelectedLayoutSegments` APIs are called in the Pages Router.
### Why?
This makes migration easier and creates consistency with our other App
Router-specific APIs that inherit the same behavior.
### How?
Similar to #47490, we return `null` if there is no Layout context
(indicating being in Pages Router)
Types are also overridden in the navigation compact module declaration
which kicks in during start to correct the types if we detect a `pages/`
directory.
Note to reviewer: #47490 didn't add a test, so I added one top-level,
let me know if you have a better suggestion for placing.
Closes NEXT-2506
Fixes#61464
### What?
Fixes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/62525
Closes NEXT-2620
Since codes below do not consider searchParams, `redirect` in server
action removes all searchParams passed from client side.
93e4bb823c (diff-c809d50461027cdba7c092e564818b1172133d337abc5c513f829c94c8483dc6R186)
So I just add conditional branch for searchParams.
---
lint, prettier was applied.
Also I have done tests by commands below. and it was all passed.
```
pnpm testonly --testPathPattern "integration" -t "redirect"
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Zack Tanner <zacktanner@gmail.com>
### What
This PR enables lightningcss features in next-swc. Currently this is for
the native build targets only, for the wasm there are some unknown build
error prevents to enable this.
Closes PACK-2607
### What
When you have bad nesting html in your React code, React wil raise
hydration error since the browser html parser might parse it to sth else
different comparing to server html on client. Previously we're display
only the warning in the error description in dev overlay.
Now we introduced another format of displaying pesudo html that
representing your code, with highlighting the html tag that causes the
error. Since React might gives you the whole component stack of React
tree, so we also introduced a way that can collapse the error.
#### Example
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/4800338/622122d6-4d2e-4c8e-95e8-4864343e478b
### Why
The reason we added this is that even we show the html diff, it could
super large due to React ordering the html on client, so the mismatch
might be a lot. The idea here is similar to what you saw when you passed
down a bad event handler into server component, we displayed a pesudo
html as it could hit your mind faster than just seeing the warning. The
best way is to display the source code, but before we can show the
source, getting component stack display as pseudo html instead of here
could be more helpful.
### After vs Before
<img width="400"
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/4800338/714119ad-ff23-46a9-bc5a-5601eb390e71">
<img width="400"
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/4800338/575f95fa-889e-4cee-ad19-9c2fea06519a">
Closes NEXT-2621
### Problem
We've identified a bug within Next.js's pages router when utilizing the
shallow routing API, specifically when invoking `router.push` with the
`{ shallow: true }` option, like so:
```javascript
router.push('/?counter=10', undefined, { shallow: true });
```
Shallow routing is designed to update the URL without running data
fetching methods such as getServerSideProps, getStaticProps, or
getInitialProps. However, a side effect of this process is that it skips
the clean-up of the cancelHandler. This leads to router error events
being fired erroneously, causing confusion and potential stability
issues, as the system behaves as if an error occurred when, in fact,
none did.
### Solution
This PR addresses the issue by modifying the shallow routing logic to
also skip the creation of the cancelHandler. Given that shallow routing
operations are synchronous and do not involve data fetching or other
asynchronous tasks that might need to be canceled, the cancelHandler is
unnecessary in this context.
fixes#61772
---------
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
## What?
Currently flight-manifest-plugin relies on looping over all webpack
chunk groups and trying to infer the entrypoint name from them, which
can be brittle in cases where the chunk group doesn't match exactly with
the entrypoint, which happens for the `_not-found` entrypoint for
example.
This PR changes the implementation to use `compilation.entrypoints`
directly. `compilation.entrypoints` is a `Map` where the key is the
entrypoint name and the value is the entrypoint chunk group, exactly
what this logic was looking for in the current implementation.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation
- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide
### Adding or Updating Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Closes NEXT-2637
### What?
generateSitemaps function returns a 404 for /sitemap/[id].xml in
production
### Why?
While finding the correct sitemap partition from the array, we check the
param against the id. Which works in dev because id and param are both
without trailing .xml. But it fails in production as param has a
trailing .xml (/sitemap/[id] works in production because it falls back
to dynamic loading and param and id are both without .xml)
### How?
If we are in production environment, check the id with a trailing .xml
because that's whats returned from generateStaticParams, an array of
__metadata_id__ with trailing .xml
Fixes#61969
---------
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <inbox@huozhi.im>
### What?
Run transforms with the tokio context so Wasmer works properly.
### Why?
To allow invoking Wasm plugins. `wasmer` had a breaking change.
### How?
Closes PACK-2587
Closes#62081
---------
Co-authored-by: hrmny <8845940+ForsakenHarmony@users.noreply.github.com>
This moves the locale redirect handling out of `base-server` as it
shouldn't be handled here and should be at the routing level. This
avoids the duplicate handling with middleware that causes the incorrect
detection/infinite looping. Test case from separate PR was carried over
to prevent regression.
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/55648
Closes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/62435
Closes: NEXT-2627
Closes: NEXT-2628
---------
Co-authored-by: Nourman Hajar <nourmanhajar@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: samcx <sam@vercel.com>
### What
Change from processing the file with `next-metatdata-route-loader`
directly into passing the file as loader query, and leave an empty
resource file for it. This will resolve the error that users were seeing
with `manifest.json` convention.
```
Import trace for requested module:
../../../../packages/next/dist/build/webpack/loaders/next-metadata-route-loader.js?page=%2Fmanifest.jso
n%2Froute&isDynamic=0!./app/manifest.json?__next_metadata_route__
getStaticAssetRouteCode page /manifest.json/route this.resourcePath /Users/huozhi/workspace/next.js/tes
t/e2e/app-dir/metadata-json-manifest/app/manifest.json
```
### Why
I looked at the loader process that the final resource processed by
webpack is `json!next-metadata-route-loader...`, which means the builtin
json loader processing json file after the metadata route loader. I
didn't get chance to solve the ordering issue, so I changed the
resourcePath to empty "", and pass the file path as query into the
loader to avoid json-loader processing it after transpilation.
Fixes#59923
Closes NEXT-2630
Closes NEXT-2439
This ensures our dynamic routes that have the same specificity as
`_next/static/:path*` don't get matched unexpectedly when the
`_next/static` asset doesn't exist. We were holding off on making this
change explicit due to compatibility concerns but these are no longer a
concern and the unexpected matching is more of a concern.
Closes: CSM-11
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/19270
Closes NEXT-2613
### What
Fixes `redirect()` call under suspense boundary, redirect url should
include the `basePath` in the url.
### Why
`redirect()` under suspense boundaries will go through server html
insertion, which is being used every time by suspense boundary resolved,
new errors will triggered from SSR streaming. It was missing before.
Fixes NEXT-2615
Fixes#62407
### What?
We should treat the warning for CSR bailout the same as the hard-error,
and show the stack trace for either case.
### Why?
It might be useful to track down the source of this warning.
### How?
We have the stack info already, but we only showed it during the error
logging. We should show it for warnings too.
This is similar to #61200
Closes NEXT-2624
Addresses #57066
Currently, a user running `next start` on an un-built Next.js project
receives a confusing uncaught error before the process just ends:
```
▲ Next.js 14.1.0
- Local: http://localhost:3000
[Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, open '/home/flotwig/src/project/.next/BUILD_ID'] {
errno: -2,
code: 'ENOENT',
syscall: 'open',
path: '/home/flotwig/src/project/.next/BUILD_ID'
}
```
In my case, I ran into this because I had not worked with Next.js for a
while, and I forgot that `next dev` was used for local development, not
`next start`. I believe many of the confused users in #57066 are making
a similar mistake and not realizing it, due to the error message.
This PR catches an `ENOENT` when reading `BUILD_ID` and suggests that
the user `next build` or `next dev` to remove this friction point:
```
▲ Next.js 14.1.1-canary.69
- Local: http://localhost:3000
Error: Could not find a production build in the '.next' directory. Try building your app with 'next build' before starting the production server. https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/production-start-no-build-id
at setupFsCheck (/home/flotwig/src/next.js/packages/next/src/server/lib/router-utils/filesystem.ts:157:13)
at initialize (/home/flotwig/src/next.js/packages/next/src/server/lib/router-server.ts:90:21)
at Server.<anonymous> (/home/flotwig/src/next.js/packages/next/src/server/lib/start-server.ts:295:28)
```
A few things probably need to be resolved before this PR can merge, I
would appreciate any input from Next.js maintainers.
- [x] Is this the best place to catch this? I am not familiar with the
Next.js codebase, so I just caught this in the most obvious way.
- [x] Can the error message be improved?
- [x] Add a test for the error in `test/development`
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
### What
When the popstate action is fired (as is the case in a browser back
button), if the page you're going back to has missing cache node data,
the router will crash.
### Why
Almost all router actions will suspend at the app-router level with the
exception of `ACTION_RESTORE`. This was to address an issue where
suspending in the router would add enough delay for browser scroll
restoration behavior not to work.
As a result, when going back to the page with missing data, app-router
wouldn't suspend but layout-router would suspend on the missing data
while triggering a lazy fetch. We trigger a server-patch with the
applied lazy data, but when React replays the render, it will replay the
branch without the cache node data applied. This results in the router
getting caught in a loop of suspending, applying the cache node,
replaying the branch without the cache node, and eventually crashing due
to an error thrown by React to prevent re-suspending indefinitely.
### How
This adds a property to the cache node to signal if the lazy data has
been resolved. If it has been, we won't call the server patch action
again.
Fixes#61336
Closes NEXT-2438
Currently to redirect to another RSC route of the same app, we initiate
another request to that route. This PR changes that request to directly
use the internal hostname of the current server handler, rather than
relying on other headers.
Closes NEXT-2614
### What
Introduce a `react-server` export condition of `next/navigation`, which
only take effects in RSC layer. And it will only contain `notFound` and
`redirect` related APIs, which can be shared in both server components
and client components environment. This export excludes those APIs
working with React context which are only working in client components.
### Why
We fixed an issue bad alias for react-server condition of react itself
in
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/61522/files#diff-ecb951c8d26893f6d1e4425a873b399d52346ef63eb90fba79d980cef2fabe8cL35
, this was a good fix. But we found that if you're using edge runtime
with `next/navigation` it will error with bundling that you're attempted
to import some client component hooks such as `useContext` from react.
So we introduced a `react-server` version of `next/navigation` that
doesn't interoplate with any client hooks, can we'll bundle that one
instead of original `next/navigation` when you're using it in server
components or app routes.
Closes NEXT-2583
Closes NEXT-2519
Fixes#62187
### What?
Hide frames that start with `node:internal`.
### Why?
These are usually unactionable anyway.
### How?
Filter these lines the same way we filtered `stringify <anonymous>` in
#62325
Closes NEXT-2593
### What?
Reduces the number of css chunks per entrypoint by merging chunks.
### Why?
In larger application the total CSS deduplication approach falls short
in a sense of it's causing way too many separate chunks, which results
in way to many requests. That affects page load performance.
Closes PACK-2598
With Server Actions, a module-level encryption can happen when you do:
```js
function wrapAction(value) {
return async function () {
'use server'
console.log(value)
}
}
const action = wrapAction('some-module-level-encryption-value')
```
...as that action will be created when requiring this module, and it
contains an encrypted argument from its closure (`value`). This
currently throws an error during build:
```
Error: Missing manifest for Server Actions. This is a bug in Next.js
at d (/Users/shu/Documents/git/next.js/test/e2e/app-dir/actions/.next/server/chunks/1772.js:1:15202)
at f (/Users/shu/Documents/git/next.js/test/e2e/app-dir/actions/.next/server/chunks/1772.js:1:16917)
at 714 (/Users/shu/Documents/git/next.js/test/e2e/app-dir/actions/.next/server/app/encryption/page.js:1:2806)
at t (/Users/shu/Documents/git/next.js/test/e2e/app-dir/actions/.next/server/webpack-runtime.js:1:127)
at 7940 (/Users/shu/Documents/git/next.js/test/e2e/app-dir/actions/.next/server/app/encryption/page.js:1:941)
at t (/Users/shu/Documents/git/next.js/test/e2e/app-dir/actions/.next/server/webpack-runtime.js:1:127)
at r (/Users/shu/Documents/git/next.js/test/e2e/app-dir/actions/.next/server/app/encryption/page.js:1:4529)
at /Users/shu/Documents/git/next.js/test/e2e/app-dir/actions/.next/server/app/encryption/page.js:1:4572
at t.X (/Users/shu/Documents/git/next.js/test/e2e/app-dir/actions/.next/server/webpack-runtime.js:1:1181)
at /Users/shu/Documents/git/next.js/test/e2e/app-dir/actions/.next/server/app/encryption/page.js:1:4542
```
Because during module require phase, the encryption logic can't run as
it doesn't have Server/Client references available yet (which are set
during the rendering phase).
Since both references are global singletons to the server and are
already loaded early, this fix makes sure that they're registered via
`setReferenceManifestsSingleton` before requiring the module.
Closes NEXT-2579
This continues https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/62336 and ensures
we chunk fully but removes the cache groups as that introduces some
un-necessary duplication. With this configuration we ensure we split
chunks of all types which fixes the OOM/cache size issue and also avoids
overall chunk size increase.
Closes NEXT-2577
Previously, runtime errors would not be recovered from. Like the webpack
implementation, this addresses the issue by performing a full page
reload when recovering from a runtime error.
Test Plan: `test/development/acceptance-app/error-recovery.test.ts --
Error recovery app default stuck error`
Closes PACK-2569
This test case was added in #59752, but this doesn't seem like the
correct behavior.
The original PR was intended to be smart about resolving `/default.tsx`
to a route group default (e.g. `/(foo)/default.tsx`) when one wasn't
specified. But since the route group is creating a new hierarchy in the
tree and defines its own layout, if the route group layout doesn't
specify a default, then the not found behavior seems correct.
To fix unexpected not-found behavior in this case, you should specify a
default at the same level as the layout where the missing slot(s) might
be rendered.
Closes NEXT-2565
### What?
* scope issues from subscriptions to the websocket connection
* close subscriptions when closing the websocket connection
### Why?
* subscriptions on one page should not affect other pages
### How?
Closes PACK-2567
This adds an experimental flag to allow exiting during prerendering when
the first path errors instead of waiting until all prerendering is
finished to then fail the build.
x-ref: [slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C0676QZBWKS/p1708559793380989)
Closes: NEXT-2561
Closes NEXT-2563
### What?
Run 10 concurrent Turbopack compilation jobs instead of all of them
show a progress spinner
### Why?
* In future this allows to reclaim memory for finished jobs
* It looks nicer in tracing
Closes PACK-2561
### What?
Allow [typescript-eslint
v7](https://typescript-eslint.io/blog/announcing-typescript-eslint-v7)
support
### Why?
Allow compatibility with typescript eslint v7, pave the way to support
eslint flat config and possibly typescript 5.4
### How?
Add a v7 to the allowed versions in eslint-config-next dependencies and
regenerate the lock with pnpm install. Be aware that some eslint peer
dev deps have been updated in the process. See the lock
Tested with pnpm build && ppm lint
## Close
- Closes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/62138
### What?
In today's implementation, requests that don't end in `.rsc` are getting
the data request query. We need to remove this toggle to prevent them
from 500'ing.
### Why?
The invariant triggered was:
212553958c/packages/next/src/server/base-server.ts (L2838-L2842)
Crawling up the code, the conditional:
212553958c/packages/next/src/server/base-server.ts (L2815)
must be `true`.
The variable `isDataReq` is set here:
212553958c/packages/next/src/server/base-server.ts (L1833-L1839)
This conditional expression is a bit complex, but it simplifies down to:
- `isDataReq` is `true` when (TODO)
- `isDataReq` is `false` when (TODO)
### How?
Closes NEXT-2341
Fixes#61377
Tested manually by:
- Building and packaging this branch locally
- Deploying tarball and then depending on it as the Next.js version for
an example app similar to the one reported by #61377
- Inspecting console for 500 errors.
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: Zack Tanner <zacktanner@gmail.com>
## Description
We need to manually update the `@capsizecss/metrics` every time it
updates so we get the latest fallback fonts.
## Changes
- https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/47115
Closes NEXT-2547
### What
This PR amends turbopack's behavior to handle some cases of normalized
path (`%5F` starting path), mainly fixes entry lookup works against
original path without normalization, also bends the output path of
client reference manifest matchs to what next.js expects.
Closes PACK-2553
This adds a new span to allow tracking the sum of all client component
loading times for a specific request along with the count of items
loaded.
Closes NEXT-2540
---------
Co-authored-by: Zack Tanner <zacktanner@gmail.com>
### What
When a prefetch cache entry becomes "stale", it'll remain stale until
eventually it gets evicted. However during that stale window, the cache
is never revalidated, and so instant navigations stop working and data
is fetched from origin every navigation.
### Why
The `lastUsedTime` entry on the prefetch cache is currently only updated
after the first read. Once it becomes stale, `applyFlightData`'s
recursive functions will see that there is no longer a reusable prefetch
cache entry, and will trigger a lazy fetch of the new data on every
subsequent navigation.
### How
This updates prefetch cache handling to always ensure we’re using a
fresh or reusable prefetch cache entry. This means that stale prefetch
entries will be refreshed on a navigation event. As a result of this,
I’ve had to disable one of our tests that relies on this stale cache
behavior. It’s not ideal that we’re blocked on the loading boundary when
fetching child segment data—ideally we can refactor this to cache the
loading component in the CacheNode and copy it over on navigations,
similar to how ‘head’ is handled. I’ll work on this in a separate PR.
Note: The new client cache test for this is disabled in PPR for the same
reason as the other tests: auto prefetching with PPR navigations is
currently loading fresh data rather than reusing the prefetch cache.
Fixes#58969Fixes#58723
Closes NEXT-1904
### What?
* Verify correctness of externals
* error when packages can't be made external
### Why?
* Resolving to incorrect externals might lead to runtime errors
* Give users hints how to fix these issues
### How?
Closes PACK-2535
---------
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
### What & Why
This PR helps fixes a long time tree-shaking issue that if you're import
some identifiers from client components, the whole client component is
being included in the client chunk. Because we're using import eager
mode in webpack to include all the client component modules that make
sure they're present in SSR entry and browser entry when they're
transformed to client reference on RSC layer.
But the way we collect client components is a bit "aggressive" where
contains some spaces to optimize.
### How
We change the collected client components from simpliy collecting it
resolved module request, into collecting both the imported identifiers
(by server components) and the module request. And when we inserted the
used client components imports into the SSR and Client entry, leverage
webpack magic comments `"webpackExports"` to only contain the used
exports in the bundle. Thank you webpack for this nice feature : )
Along the way we also fixed an issue that when you only used default
export, the `default` export itself should also be proxied when the
bundle is in ESM.
#### Notice
There's a limitation yet that it can't work with barrel file, if you
have a shared component `index.js` to re-export the changes several
client components there and you only partially import few from
`index.js` it won't work. For the cases that the node_modules package
contain a barrel file importing multiple client components, please use
[optimizePackageImports](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/next-config-js/optimizePackageImports)
config for now. We'll have follow up optimizations
### Testing Result
If we compare the `react-aria-components` the reproduction from #60246,
you'll see the result being optimized a lot:
#### After vs Before
134KB being tree-shaked out 🤯
```
Route (app) Size First Load JS
┌ ○ / 324 B 127 kB
├ ○ /_not-found 872 B 86.5 kB
└ ○ /other-page 174 B 127 kB
```
```
Route (app) Size First Load JS
┌ ○ / 325 B 261 kB
├ ○ /_not-found 870 B 86.5 kB
└ ○ /other-page 176 B 261 kB
```
Fixes#60246
Related report: https://github.com/adobe/react-spectrum/issues/5639
Closes NEXT-2527
phase 1 of NEXT-1799
---------
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
### What?
The [create-next-app
documentation](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/create-next-app#non-interactive)
under API reference says that;
> Further, you can negate default options by prefixing them with --no-
(e.g., --no-eslint).
When I tried to use --no-import-alias, I thought that it would
automatically use the default alias (@/*), but it does not.
### Why?
Each option has --no prefix control but import-alias has no --no prefix
control to give default value to program.
In an [Interactive](https://nextjs.org/#interactive) approach, the user
can select a prompt; `Would you like to customize the default import
alias (@/*)? No / Yes.` If the user selects no, then the default alias
is applied with @/*.
### How?
Implementing a condition solve the problem for general purpose. If
arguments includes `--no-import-alias` then the importAlias section
automatically apply the default value.
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
