### What?
Fix robots.txt generation
### Why?
Should support multiple allow/disallow rules, they should be generated in different lines
### How?
Closes NEXT-905
Fixes#47224
fix NEXT-905 ([link](https://linear.app/vercel/issue/NEXT-905))
In #47328 we made the root level `/not-found.js` a special entry, to
override the page 404 during builds. However, it's possible that the
user has a valid `/not-found/page.js` route that might conflict with
this special entry. This PR changes the entry to be `/_not-found` so it
will never conflict with existing valid entries.
This re-enables running the CNA tests for all non-docs changes as it's now ensuring we don't regress on turbopack or our default templates.
Also fixes the main repo's package.json files from being modified during tests.
Previously the app route handler was included in the server bundle, and
called into user code to execute the underlying handler logic. This PR
serves to move the handler code into the bundle so that the Node.js
environment more closely matches the Edge environment.
fix NEXT-712 ([link](https://linear.app/vercel/issue/NEXT-712))
Previously to this PR, if an absolute path contained an `_` it would
ignore all app files. If for example the Next.js app was in a folder
named `/some/_directory` then today:
```
/some/_directory/app/page.js <- should 200, currently 404
/some/_directory/app/route.js <- should 200, currently 404
/some/_directory/app/_internal/route.js <- should 404, currently 200 in development
```
This also enables the same `_` functionality for app routes in
development. After this PR, we get:
```
/some/_directory/app/page.js <- 200
/some/_directory/app/route.js <- 200
/some/_directory/app/_internal/route.js <- 404
```
Fixes WEB-787.
This implements automatic font fallbacks for `next/font/local`. It uses the `allsorts` library to query font metrics across woff and ttf fonts.
Test Plan: Now passes 24 Next.js integration tests, up from 14.
Thanks again for Next.js 13! Finding a bunch of new ways to improve things 🙌
Just a quick PR to switch the Jest configuration file with `next/jest` to ESM to eliminate another instance of CommonJS.
ESM requires a `.js` extension on the import.
An alternative would be to switch to a TypeScript config file (`jest.config.ts`) which would (I am guessing) not require this file extension (but still allow switching to an ESM-style `import` syntax).
New version in the diff:
```js
// jest.config.mjs
import nextJest from 'next/jest.js'
const createJestConfig = nextJest({
// Provide the path to your Next.js app to load next.config.js and .env files in your test environment
dir: './',
})
// Add any custom config to be passed to Jest
/** @type {import('jest').Config} */
const config = {
// Add more setup options before each test is run
// setupFilesAfterEnv: ['<rootDir>/jest.setup.js'],
// if using TypeScript with a baseUrl set to the root directory then you need the below for alias' to work
moduleDirectories: ['node_modules', '<rootDir>/'],
testEnvironment: 'jest-environment-jsdom',
}
// createJestConfig is exported this way to ensure that next/jest can load the Next.js config which is async
export default createJestConfig(config)
```
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [x] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Adding OpenBSD and NetBSD platforms
Fixes: #44058
Probably needs more review I tried compiling the codebase as instructed
with pnpm
[here](https://github.com/dante-robinson/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/developing.md),
but turbo (a dependency of pnpm) has no BSD binary so I can't compile
the code on OpenBSD to test it however @gjskha mentioned in the issue he
added openbsd as a platform to get it working so in theory this change
should work and shouldn't break anything.
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Currently in a client boundary file, we only explicitly export
individual fields in ESM (`export foo`) when the source type is
`module`. However in most of the time SWC gives the `auto` source type.
This PR improves the type detection a bit so if it's `auto` and we do
see ESM exports collected, we assume it's ESM and re-export these
fields.
Fixes#41940, fix NEXT-796
([link](https://linear.app/vercel/issue/NEXT-796)).
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes WEB-249
Depends on vercel/turbo#4288
This implements support for `next/font/local` for Turbopack. It:
* Removes the compile-time feature restricting access to `next/font/local`
* Implements `NextFontLocalReplacerVc` and `NextFontLocalCssModuleReplacerVc`, similar to their `next/font/google` equivalents, and adds them as ImportMappings to handle requests for `next/font/local/target.css` and `@vercel/turbopack-next/internal/font/local/cssmodule.module.css` (these requests are created by the JavaScript returned by the requests for the `target.css` module)
* Implements fallback support for Times New Roman and Arial via `adjust_font_fallback` as the webpack implementation does. Font metric override adjustment will be added in a future PR.
Test Plan: New passes 14 next-font integration tests in the Next.js integration test suite, up from 8.
Previously `next-swc` had relay transform inline, but it makes
maintenance harder. So this PR patches next-swc to use relay plugin from
`swc-project/plugins` repository.
Closes WEB-782
Fixes#47239
fix NEXT-883 ([link](https://linear.app/vercel/issue/NEXT-883))
### Fixing a bug
Minor fix for https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/46589, forgot to
wrap in evaluate in result fail to ask to browser to lookup overlay in
--turbo tests.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
### What?
Adds a warning when `useSearchParams` deopts the entire page to
client-side rendering.
When there is no Suspense boundary the entire page becomes client-side
rendered, you can learn more about that here:
https://beta.nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/use-search-params#static-rendering
### Why?
We've seen a few cases where people accidentally deopt the entire page
by calling `useSearchParams` as there was no indicator that this deopt
happened.
### How?
When the full page deopt happens the error is caught by the rendering
code so we warn there.
Closes NEXT-589
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change
### What?
This PR adds next-types-plugin's support for Route Handlers.
### Why?
Since `route.js` is somewhat like `page.js` and `layout.js`, I find it to be necessary that we also enable TS checks for these files as well.
### How?
Just changing the `createTypeGuardFile` function a bit and adding a few new tests, yeah.
More cleanup flowing out of the removal of the `target` option.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
### What?
Ensures `useParams` can be called in `pages`. In that case it returns
`null` similar to other navigation hooks that can't be backported.
### Why?
When migrating you can have components that are rendered in both `app`
and `pages`.
### How?
Uses the same approach as `useSearchParams` and `usePathname`. Type is
added to `navigation.d.ts` that overrides `next/navigation` only when
`pages` exist, that way applications built entirely on `app` don't get
the `null` type.
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
### What?
Removes `head.js` file convention in favor of built-in SEO support through `metadata`: https://beta.nextjs.org/docs/guides/seo
### Why?
The `head.js` convention was superseded by the built-in SEO support which is designed specifically for Server Components.
### How?
Removed the `head.js` handling in app-loader and the tests for it.
fix NEXT-812 ([link](https://linear.app/vercel/issue/NEXT-812))
