This adds two codemods for `next/image`.
The first codemod a safe solution to upgrade from 12 to 13 by swapping
to `next/legacy/image`.
The second codemod is an experimental solution that attempts to automate
the [migration
guide](https://nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/next/future/image#migration).
Reduce remote request by reusing response between server and client
compilation. Once reused it can be removed, will be cached by webpack
after that.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Reduces the amount of options for local fonts. Adds additional regression tests.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This PR adds a script to run a minimal Next server in order to reproduce more easily the cold boot conditions in production.
You can use it by using `pnpm start` after having built your app with `pnpm next-react-exp build bench/minimal-server/benchmar-app` from the root of this repo.
<img width="338" alt="image" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11064311/195102966-6997b957-1e6b-433f-b611-e0eaec9462fa.png">
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
## Context
I'm investigating cold boot perf
## This PR
Did some manual analysis on next cold boot for the "regular" node target
and found out that we are spending a good 10ms evaluating the edge
runtime module when we shouldn't be in most cases.
This is a quick fix to only load it when actually required.
## Test plan
I have a simple script which I'll push in a separate PR to measure the
cold boot.
Results:
before:
<img width="230" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11064311/195073994-c3d28961-5d22-401f-a4b0-026c791ff2bd.png">
after:
<img width="275" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11064311/195073941-a0897532-6e9f-482d-a1f0-8b9c9231c6b0.png">
it appears to be a 10~15ms win on cold boot
## Following up
We probably want a separate NextMinimalServer type of build?
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Fixes#41258
When we detect `type: "module"` in `package.json`:
~1. generate `server.mjs`~ Not necessary when `type: "module"` is set.
2. use `import` instead of `require`
3. replace `__dirname` with [ESM compatible
alternative](https://blog.logrocket.com/alternatives-dirname-node-js-es-modules/)
In this PR, I also moved some tests (those using `output: "standalone"`)
to a new `test/production/standalone-mode` directory for easier
discoverability in the future.
Run the related test with `pnpm test
test/production/standalone-mode/type-module/index.test.ts`
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
## Content
In version
[`7.15.0`](https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-javascript/releases/tag/7.15.0)
of the `@sentry/nextjs` SDK we introduced a new build-time feature that
removes the need for manually wrapping API routes.
This PR removes all manual `withSentry` calls from the `with-sentry`
example.
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
In Jest, we were mocking the `next/image` imports with a width and
height of `24`. If the developer set `placeholder="blur"` on their
images though, this triggered the warning:
> Image with src "/img.jpg" is smaller than 40x40. Consider removing the
"placeholder='blur'" property to improve performance.
Since we cannot reliably hide this warning without knowing the actual
image dimensions, and we also provide a `blurDataURL` by default, we
should increase the mock image size to suppress the warning.
Note that using `moduleNameMapper` in `jest.config.js`, the developer
can already tweak the mock behavior:
a78163dc61/packages/next/build/jest/jest.ts (L111-L121)Fixes#41248
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Just fixing an error in the documentation where the text doesn't match
what the code snippet is doing.
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This updates to skip the data request done during query hydration when
middleware is present as it was mainly to gather query params from any
potential rewrites in middleware although this is usually not needed for
static pages and the context can be gathered in different ways on the
client.
x-ref: [slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C045FKE5P51/p1665082474010149)
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
When using `@next/font/local` we can't have pre calculated metrics for the font. This PR uses fontkit to read metadata about the imported local font in order to generate a fallback.
Also removes some props from the api that's better done automatically in the future.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
- Implements failing test
- Implemented handling for the case where the router tree does not match up with the segment path being navigated to. This is what caused the underlying error.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This PR ensures that for the app directory, `beforeInteractive`, `afterInteractive` and `lazyOnload` scripts via `next/script` are properly supported.
For both `beforeInteractive` and `afterInteractive` scripts, a preload link tag needs to be injected by Float. For `beforeInteractive` scripts and Next.js' polyfills, they need to be manually executed in order before starting the Next.js' runtime, without blocking the downloading of HTML and other scripts.
This PR doesn't include the `worker` type of scripts yet.
Note: in this PR I changed the inlined flight data `__next_s` to `__next_f`, and use `__next_s` for scripts data, because I can't find a better name for `next/script` that is also short at the same time.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Kudos @dferber90 who found this issue. Added a test and handled it gracefully for now. Keep in mind the behavior can't be 1-1 so it takes the `as` as the `href` value given that masking of parameters in this way is no longer supported, that will be superseded by parallel routes / route interception.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Check that the module has assets. This might not always be the case in
app dev if there was an error. Test added to make sure it recovers
correctly.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
It seems that #38867 made `AppProps` always require the `pageProps`
object shape to be passed as a generic since the default `{}` will throw
a TS error if you try accessing any property:
Before:
After:
Technically, it would be more correct since accessing `pageProps`
properties would otherwise be unsafe, but this seems to break the
current behavior.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: snyk-bot <snyk-bot@snyk.io>
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
## 🐛 What's in there?
`foo instanceof Function` is wrongly considered as Dynamic code evaluation by our static analyzer.
This PR fixes it.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## 🧪 How to reproduce?
1. Create a simple repro in `examples` folder:
```js
// examples/instance-of-function/pages/index.js
export default function Home() {
return <h1>home</h1>
}
// examples/instance-of-function/middleware.js
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
export default async function handler() {
console.log('is arrow a function?', (() => {}) instanceof Function)
return NextResponse.next()
}
```
1. build with next `pnpm next build examples/instance-of-function`
> the build fails
1. rebuild next to include PR's fix `pnpm build`
1. build with new next `pnpm next build examples/instance-of-function`
> the build works
## 📔 Notes to reviewers
`hooks.expression.for(`${prefix}Function`).tap(NAME, handleExpression)` is actually legacy code from the original implementation. It's used when finding `Function` regardless of how it is used. We only want to find `new Function()` or `Function()`, which `hooks.calls` and `hooks.new` are covering.
`eval instanceof Function` is perfectly legit code on the edge, despite its uselessness :lol-think:
Because we got multiple people asking "how do I relax this error when my code contains unreachable dynamic code evaluation", I've copy-pasted details about `config.unstable_allowDynamic` into the error page. Because users do not always click links :blob_shrug:
Move react-dev-overlay into hot reloader client components, and let it imported by app router. So then we don't need to have hot reloader and react tree as adjacent sibilings but the overlay with error boundary is wrapping the react tree
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <6324199+timneutkens@users.noreply.github.com>
Changes how font loaders are configured in next config, makes more sense since options can be optional. Also adds error for when font loaders are used from within node_modules.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Fixed link to phases lines in the documentation
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Finds the font files connected to font loader modules and adds them to
the font loader manifest. They're then collected and rendered similarly
to CSS links in app-render.
The behaviour of edge-function-runtime in the case of an error was not
identical to the edge-runtime.
If a type other than "Uint8Array" is written to the Response stream a
unhandledreject is raised and logged.
The current implementations(nodejs) accepts also Buffers and Strings
which causes that a Application
Developer things our stream implementation is broken if it is executed
as worker.
We introduced a helper function to consume the response stream and write
the "Uint8Array" stream chunks
to the server implementation. Due to the complication that the error
side effect is emitted via the unhandledrejection
handler it is almost impossible to test --- jest does not allow testing
of the unhandlerejections.
We tested extendsiveliy the helper in the edge-runtime so that this PR
integrates just the consuming function.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Currently `react-dom` isn't handled as an external dependency in SSR,
unlike `react`. This means that the ReactDOM imported by client
components isn't the same instance as the ReactDOM that does SSR.
This PR also upgrades React experimental to the latest version.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Since `next/dynamic` has client hooks that not compatible with server
components, and app renderer doesn't provide context (such as
`LoadableContext`) for it to use. Previously we provided a simple
replacement using `React.lazy` for `next/dynamic` if you want to use it
in appDir.
This PR always alias it to the `React.lazy ` implementation for appDir
so that user won't need to worry about the dynamic options. They can
only use `dynamic()` without 2nd options arg
```js
import dynamic from 'next/dynamic'
const Dynamic = dynamic(() => import('./dynamic-component'))
```
