<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
# Description
fixes#31159fixes#44553
Path aliases defined in `tsconfig.json` or `jsconfig.json` are not
automatically configured to work with Jest. This means that these
aliases have to be defined in multiple places.
This PR configures the SWC Jest transform to handle the `baseUrl` and
`paths`, so that users don't need to configure a `moduleNameMapper` for
Jest.
~This PR intends to make the experience more seamless by automatically
configuring Jest's `moduleNameMapper` and `moduleDirectories` based on
the settings in a project's `tsconfig`/`jsconfig`.~
~Users will be able to supply their own configuration for these fields,
if they have use-cases that require manual configuration.~
~The implementation is taken from the [`paths-to-module-name-mapper`
function in
`ts-jest`](5a0880add0/src/config/paths-to-module-name-mapper.ts).~
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
- closes WEB-672.
Due to differences of error overlay layout between turbopack and normal
next-dev, test fixtures cannot lookup corresponding error text with same
data-* tag. Companion PR https://github.com/vercel/turbo/pull/4015 added
new tag for the turbopack specific, and this PR utilizes those if test
runs against --turbo.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
This PR fixes some issue caused by PR 46327, which asserted that
`NextBuildContext.original(Rewrites|Redirects)` are defined although
`config._original(Redirects|Rewrites)` (which these two copied from) are
not actually defined when `config.redirects`/`config.rewrites` are not
as well (see `loadRedirects`/`loadRewrites`). So this PR fixes that by
removing those assertions and checking whether those are defined in
`createRouteDefinitions` before iterating them.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
alternate urls should allow string type for relative paths
## Bug
Fixes#45824
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
---------
Currently if a file or folder (that contains an entry) is renamed in app dir, the dev server will stop working because we never remove the old entry. Since all client entries in app dir are created as child entries programmatically via the RSC plugin, they're different and not handled by our existing hot reloader logic:
f0cbe84e4c/packages/next/src/server/dev/hot-reloader.ts (L666-L677)
This PR adds a file path to child entries as well (it can be layout, page and other entries) so in the entry generation step we can prune the invalid ones.
Fixes#46379, fixes NEXT-650.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/46545
In the open graph protocol spec, `og:image` and `og:image:url` are identical. But some platform might don't have full support for it.
We change it back to render `og:image` as it's the most common and compatible format, also easy to align with the code docs
fixes#46104
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: Wyatt Johnson <accounts+github@wyattjoh.ca>
`entryName` will contain the extension if it's not a normal JS entry, this causes CSS being missing in pages with a custom extension in app dir (e.g. MDX). Here we add a `.replace(/\.[^\\/.]+$/, '')` to the entry name.
Fixes NEXT-709
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This PR refactors the implementation of `Route<T>` to be more compact
(2/3 fewer union types), and adds support for static rewrites and
redirects. Check the updated test for more details.
In the future I plan to continue to refactor this by extract static
routes out as unions (instead of always relying on type inference) for
better autocompletion. Maybe a dev-only feature?
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
dynamic = "error" should throw in dev mode, currently, it just gets
ignored.
It doesn't throw a nice custom error, but at least it isn't silently
ignored anymore.
Build behavior stays the same.
We want to make sure that our examples are not breaking.
We don't want to be slowed down by broken 3rd party packages, but we
need to ensure that examples covering next.js features are always green.
Added as a standalone workflow that doesn't parallelize. It will just
run on a cron schedule, so we can check for current status. We can add
Slack ping later if we need to.
The workflow tests just that our examples can build, so mostly TS
issues. We could definitely follow up with actual tests, but that is not
as low-hanging.
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Neutkens <tim@timneutkens.nl>
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Related
* Closes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/39146 - PR abandoned.
## Details
I was having the same issue at work, as a workaround, we've changed the
`largePageDataBytes` setting as advised but we'd like to keep the
warning ideally. It's something we need to address, but just don't want
to spam our log aggregators while the large data issue isn't resolved.
I believe I've more or less copied what was in the original PR, some
small differences:
* I use `Set` instead of `Map`, please let me know if there is an
advantage to using Map!
* Just to keep code a bit tidier (subjective) put an early return
instead of nesting all the code in an if.
* Added a test to verify only one log appears even when the page is
accessed twice [as requested
here](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/39146#pullrequestreview-1064486985).
Fixes#46401
This PR fixes route groups not working with Windows by handling slashes properly by replacing RegEx expressions with `ensureLeadingSlash`, `getPageFromPath` (which uses `normalizePathSep`),... It also adds a test that ensures `typedRoutes` works with route groups to `app-types.test.js`.
It also replaces `fs.readFile` and String's `replaceAll` that were used to augment `next` in PR 46332 (which were rather overkill and inefficient in my opinion) with a `export * from "next/types/index.d.ts"`.
I've also converted `edgeRouteTypes` and `nodeRouteTypes` to 2 Sets so as to avoid duplications. When we write type `Route`, we also check if a route in `nodeRouteTypes` is already defined in `edgeRouteTypes`.
Types like `SearchOrHash`, `Suffix`, `SafeSlug`,... have also been made private to module "next" (before this PR users could access to these types anywhere in their workspace, which doesn't seem like an expected behaviour in my opinion).
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
We currently use the `NEXT_RSC_ERR_INVALID_API` error code for metadata API conflicts which is wrong. The format should be `NEXT_RSC_ERR_INVALID_API: foo` and then the formatter transforms it into `foo isn't supported in app/`.
This PR adds a new `NEXT_RSC_ERR_CONFLICT_METADATA_EXPORT` error code and improves the message. Closes#46406.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
This improves the ambiguous error seen when exporting `metadata` or
`generateMetadata` from a component marked with the `"use client";`
directive.
Example output from tests (`pnpm test-dev
test/development/acceptance-app/rsc-build-errors.test`)
```console
File path:
app/client-with-errors/metadata-export/page.js
console.log
browser log: ./app/client-with-errors/metadata-export/page.js
ReactServerComponentsError:
You are attempting to export "generateMetadata" from a component marked with "use client", which is disallowed. Either remove the export, or the "use client" directive. Read more: https://beta.nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/metadata
,-[6:1]
6 |
7 | // export const metadata = { title: 'client-metadata' }
8 |
9 | export async function generateMetadata() { return { title: 'client-metadata' } }
: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
`----
File path:
app/client-with-errors/metadata-export/page.js
```
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <inbox@huozhi.im>
This adds a relative app dir field to the required files manifest so
that we don't rely on absolute paths from a cached build since the cache
can be restored in a separate context where the value no longer applies.
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/45864
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
Looks like this is breaking when run against `vercel-site`, going to revert temporarily to allow investigating further without blocking canary.
Reverts vercel/next.js#46328
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
Partially resolves WEB-628
This PR is minor improvement to the fixture setup for next-script test:
if one of test assertion using `finally` to teardown next instance
(next.destroy) times out, those clause won't be called so next instance
will leak, makes subsequent test fail. PR moves teardown to `afterEach`
hook instead. This relies on the assumption we run test in band
(serial), but internals of nextdevinstance already assumes it via its
own singleton.
