Currently all scripts that are required for every page are loaded as
part of the bootstrap scripts API in React. Unfortunately this loads
them all as sync scripts and thus requires preloading which increases
their priority higher than they might otherwise be causing things like
images to load later than desired, blocking paint. We can improve this
by only using one script for bootstrapping and having the rest
pre-initialized. This only works because all of these scripts are
webpack runtime or chunks and can be loaded in any order asynchronously.
With this change we should see improvements in LCP and other metrics as
preloads for images are favored over loading scripts
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
### Why
We calculate the “next url” depending on the router state and the previous router state so that when you navigate to a route, the proxy matches with that header and returns you the intercepted route if matching
### What
- Fixes#52745
Co-authored-by: Jiachi Liu <4800338+huozhi@users.noreply.github.com>
We show the "Application error: a client-side exception has occurred (see the browser console for more information)" error incorrectly when a server-side error occurs (a digest is present) when we should be showing an error saying it is in fact a server side error and should check the logs there. This change will make the error message more accurate for users to look up
Fixes NEXT-1263
### What?
Fixes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/50129
### Why?
The current denormalization of app dir paths doesnt account for the
normalization done in `normalizeAppPath`, causing build log outputs for
certain paths such as anything under a route groups to be incorrect
### How?
There's 2 ways this could be fixed:
1.) Denormalize the app dir paths by reading the
`app-path-routes-manifest.json` and mapping back to the original file
path
2.) (what I chose to do) Normalize the keys of `appBuildManifest`
### Result
App dir paths, including route groups, now have their correct output
size
<img width="494" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/vercel/next.js/assets/93682696/0eee79b8-7d60-4c88-b07a-dfb750aa9592">
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This adds new `build and test` and `build and deploy` workflows in favor
of the existing massive `build, test, and deploy` workflow. Since the
new workflows will use `pull_request_target` this waits to remove the
existing workflow until the new one is tested.
While testing this new workflow flakey behavior in tests have also been
addressed. Along with the new workflow we will also be leveraging new
runners which allow us to run tests against the production binary of
`next-swc` so this avoids slight differences in tests we've seen due to
running against the dev binary.
Furthermore we will have a new flow for allowing workflow runs on PRs
from external forks which will either require a comment be checking a
box approving the run after each change or a label added by the team.
The new flow also no longer relies on `actions/cache` or similar which
have proven to be pretty unreliable.
Tests runs with the new workflow can be seen here
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/actions/runs/5100673508/jobs/9169416949
Currently the suffix logic is for pages so nothing happens in app dir. This PR changes it to **always** apply the `createSuffixStream(closeTag)` transform, to defer `</body></html>` to the end of the stream.
fix#48372
fix NEXT-1200
### What?
Implements resolving of `runtime` and `preferredRegion` in layouts. It
will resolve from the root layout down, each layout can override
`runtime` or `preferredRegion`.
```
app
├── layout.js -> export const runtime = 'edge'
├── page.js -> Edge runtime
└── dashboard
├── page.js -> Edge runtime
└── settings
├── layout.js -> export const runtime = 'nodejs'
└── page.js -> Node.js runtime
```
Adds support for `preferredRegion`. This is similar to `export const
config = { region: ['sfo1'] }` in `pages`.
However, there is a difference. It supports `export const
preferredRegion = 'home'` and `export const preferredRegion = 'edge'`.
`home` refers to the configured default region on your deployment
platform and `edge` refers to "all regions".
### How?
I've implemented a temporary resolving in `entries.ts`.
`preferredRegion` is tracked through the entry module in webpack which
is why it's added to all the loaders that create an entry module, this
prevents having to resolve/parse again later on.
Fixes NEXT-880
Fixes NEXT-1064
Fixes#48905Closes#48933
This PR implements new cache semantics for the app router on the client.
## Context
Currently, on the App Router, every Link navigation is prefetched and
kept forever in the cache. This means that once you visit it, you will
always see the same version of the page for the duration of your
navigation.
## This PR
This PR introduces new semantics for how the App Router will cache
during navigations. Here's a TL;DR of the changes:
- all navigations (prefetched/unprefetched) are cached for a maximum of
30s from the time it was last accessed or created (in this order).
- in addition to this, the App Router will cache differently depending
on the `prefetch` prop passed to a `<Link>` component:
- `prefetch={undefined}`/default behaviour:
- the router will prefetch the full page for static pages/partially for
dynamic pages
- if accessed within 30s, it will use the cache
- after that, if accessed within 5 mins, it will re-fetch and suspend
below the nearest loading.js
- after those 5 mins, it will re-fetch the full content (with a new
loading.js boundary)
- `prefetch={false}`:
- the router will not prefetch anything
- if accessed within 30s again, it will re-use the page
- after that, it will re-fetch fully
- `prefetch={true}`
- this will prefetch the full content of your page, dynamic or static
- if accessed within 5 mins, it will re-use the page
## Follow ups
- we may add another API to control the cache TTL at the page level
- a way to opt-in for prefetch on hover even with prefetch={false}
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
## For Contributors
### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples
- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md
### Fixing a bug
- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
### Adding a feature
- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md
## For Maintainers
- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change
### What?
### Why?
### How?
Closes NEXT-
Fixes #
-->
link NEXT-1011
This unblocks further optimization opportunities as well as fixes for
systematic problems such as NEXT-227. After this PR, only production
mode of non-app projects will be running on the legacy main process
mode.
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This ensures we prefix the dynamic route params in the query so that
they can be kept separate from actual query params from the initial
request.
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/43139
This updates to have a separate routing process and separate rendering
processes for `pages` and `app` so that we can properly isolate the two
since they rely on different react versions.
Besides allowing the above mentioned isolation this also helps us
control recovering from process crashes easier as pieces are more
isolated from one another e.g. an infinite loop during rendering will no
longer block the compiler and can be stopped/restarted as needed.
In follow-up PRs we will continue to separate out the routing logic from
the rendering logic so that each process only loads what is relevant to
it helping simplify the flow for requests regardless of type.
---------
Co-authored-by: Shu Ding <g@shud.in>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* use `check` to wait for css change
* remove unused swr deps and update them to latest
* remove swr esm test in `app-dir/app/` since it's already covered in
`app-dir/app-external/`
---------
This ensures we check if a path is `appRouter` during prefetching so
that we can trigger hard navigations quicker when routing from pages ->
app. An additional config is also exposed to allow configuring the
potential false positive rate for the client filter.
x-ref: [slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C017QMYC5FB/p1680225393243459)
Currently all import CSS resources, including CSS modules, are imported lazily. This means that they can't be chunked as by definition of "lazy" they can be loaded separately.
This PR changes it to always use "eager" so if they're in the same entry, these CSS resources can be chunked together and reduce the total amount of requests. However the downside will be tree shaking, as not all modules in a chunk are used by one entry. Two entries can only share a part of it.
Since CSS modules won't have side effects this should be a good trade off.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] [e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Looks like this is breaking when run against `vercel-site`, going to revert temporarily to allow investigating further without blocking canary.
Reverts vercel/next.js#46328
This adds a new client router filter for app paths and redirects so that
we correctly hard navigate when a transition for one of this paths is
encountered. This fixes the longstanding issue where redirects weren't
applied on the client so a redirect that matches a dynamic route as well
would transition to the dynamic route on client transition but not on
direct visit. Similarly this ensures we hard navigate to app paths from
pages even if a page dynamic route matches the path.
The specific filter leveraged here is a bloom filter as we can tolerate
some false matches (currently targeting an error rate of `2%`) as they
just trigger a hard navigation which should be acceptable and this also
avoids needing to send an entire manifest with the related paths.
We can leverage a manifest for the generated SSG paths as well in a
follow-up to fix `fallback: false` routes not being navigated correctly
on client-transition in some cases as well.
The filter is initially behind an `experimental.clientRouterFilter` flag
in `next.config.js` although this is auto-enabled when leveraging app
directory to ensure proper transitions.
fixes NEXT-609
closes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/46235
x-ref: [slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C035J346QQL/p1677028663246719)
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/41344
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/40062
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/37889
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/26426
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/35837
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
This PR ensures that the `vary` header is set for pages responses and
Edge SSR responses too, to avoid potential caching problems when
navigating between them.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Fixes NEXT-583
Ran into this when looking into adding an integration test for the RSC
normalizing PR.
Middleware has the ability to override `headers` which causes
client-side navigation to break as it'll remove the `rsc` header which
causes Next.js to respond with the HTML response instead of the RSC
payload.
This PR ensures the RSC headers are always copied over as middleware
does not get access to them.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
Added tests:
- Add tests for interception+parallel and interception
- Add test for parallel route tab bar
- Add test for back/forward navigation on parallel routes
Core changes:
- Updated handling of parallel route matcher `@` to produce the correct
router tree
- Fixed global-error resolving, it was resolving from the `page.js` on
each level. It should only live next to the root layout only, so now it
resolves when it finds the root layout.
- `applyRouterStatePatchToTree` now merges the levels of the original
tree and the patch. This ensures parallel routes that are not affected
by the response from the server are not removed from the tree.
- Ensure cache nodes are not removed when they're not affected by tree
patch, this ensures parallel route cache nodes will not be removed when
navigating.
Other changes:
- Added launch app-dir build to launch.json for vscode debugger
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
First step for making RSC responses use gzip/brotli.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
The current behavior is, when `appDir` is enabled, global CSS should be
allowed to be imported from anywhere (because components can be re-used
by both pages and app). Changes in #45619 made it not behaving correctly
and this PR fixes it.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
This PR changes the loader logic from something like `ctx.hasAppDir ?
useAppLoaderForCSS : usePagesLoaderForCSS`, to a mental modal of
`[ctx.hasAppDir ? useAppLoaderForCSSInAppLayer : null,
usePagesLoaderForCSSInPagesLayer]`. This change makes sure that both
pages and app can exist and work well together, instead of a binary
switch.
Also renamed the loader with `-dev` removed, because it is used for
production build too.
NEXT-461
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue
To address the problem that we introduced in 13.0.7 (#42589) where we thought we could use same implementation `next/dynamic` for both `pages/` and `app/` directory. But it turns out it leads to many problems, such as:
* SSR preloading could miss the content, especially with nested dynamic calls
* Closes#45213
* Introducing suspense boundary into `next/dynamic` with extra wrapped `<Suspense>` outside will lead to content is not resolevd during SSR
* Related #45151
* Closes#45099
* Unexpected hydration errors for suspense boundaries. Though react removed this error but the 18.3 is not out yet.
* Closes#44083
* Closes#45246
## Solution
Separate the dynamic implementation for `app/` dir and `pages/`.
For `app/` dir we can encourage users to:
* Directly use `React.lazy` + `Suspense` for SSR'd content, and `next/dynamic`
* For non SSR components since it requires some internal integeration with next.js.
For `pages/` dir we still keep the original implementation
If you want to use `<Suspense>` with dynamic `fallback` value, use `React.lazy` + `Suspense` directly instead of picking up `next/dynamic`
* Closes#45116
This will solve various issue before react 18.3 is out and let users still progressively upgrade to new versions of next.js.
## Bug Fix
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see [`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
Adds support for `router.push('https://google.com')`,
`router.replace('https://google.com')`, and
`redirect('https://google.com')`.
<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the
feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a
PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ]
[e2e](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`
- [ ] The "examples guidelines" are followed from [our contributing
doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md)
---------
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Since we now call `loadConfig()` in various processes our `execOnce`
handling isn't tracking when we have already shown warnings/logs in
another process so this adds a `silent` flag that we can leverage when
calling `loadConfig()`.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
Fixes: [slack
thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03KAR5DCKC/p1674351677627259)
