This PR proposes a fix for https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/11107 (JS modules are loaded twice). A more detailed explanation of the investigation that led to this PR can be found in the issue's comments (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/11107#issuecomment-791780168).
## Replicability
To identify that the issue replicates on any given project, you need to
1. look at the network tab (first/clean load of site, so preferably ⌘+⇧+R on an incognito tab),
2. sort by "name", and filter requests by `mime-type:application/javascript` (selecting "JS" in the devtools filters will actually show all "script" types, but ignore all "javascript" types)
3. look for pairs of identical calls with one originating from initial HTML (`preload` of priority "high" originating from "(index)" or "([page name])") and another one from a script (`prefetch` of priority "lowest" originating from a .js file), where neither of the files is served from the cache.
Here's a screenshot of an example of what to look for:
<img width="601" alt="Screen Shot 2021-03-07 at 09 59 18" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1325721/110234627-cf1c6d00-7f2b-11eb-9cd7-749bf881ba56.png">
The issue was reproduced easily on the following projects:
- On [nextjs.org](https://nextjs.org/) where duplicates add up to ~70kB of transferred javascript out of 470kB (14.9%).
- On [vercel.com](https://vercel.com/) where duplicates add up to ~105kB of transferred javascript out of 557kB (18.8%).
- On [tiktok.com](https://tiktok.com/en) where duplicates add up to ~514kB of transferred javascript out of 1556kB (33%).
- In my own project using `"next": "^10.0.1"` (private repo) where duplicates add up to about 5% of total transferred javascript.
- In the issue's comments, a developer reported a replication using `"^10.0.7"` on a [public repo](https://github.com/SidOfc/sidneyliebrand.io).
## Some information about the fix
- Both `preload` and `prefetch` values for `<link rel="x">` behave similarly, with the difference being in network priority level (preload is high priority, prefetch is lowest priority).
- Next.js uses `<link rel="preload">` in its initial HTML but then *only* uses `<link rel="prefetch">` for the rest of the lifetime of the page.
- However, when Next.js detects that a script should be requested in advance, it only checks for matching `<link rel="prefetch">` and not `<link rel="preload">` (which have higher priority and are present earlier in the DOM, thus have a greater likelihood of being already loaded).
This PR aims to fix that oversight.
## Potential issues (none AFAIK)
As far as I can tell by looking through the codebase, **there is no downside** not to add a `prefetch` when a `preload` is already in the DOM. No other script looks for a `<link>` based on its `rel` attribute.
* Fix bug where returning `{ notFound: true }` from GSP broke `next export`
We could just as easily omit the notFoundRoutes check, but I didn't want
to mask other potential bugs that would result in missing files
* update check
* move check
Co-authored-by: jj@jjsweb.site <jj@jjsweb.site>
Currently `new URL()` for server assets is completely broken because of the `publicPath` that is used for them too. `new URL()` for SSR is broken on windows as it's using absolute urls on the windows filesystem. And `new URL()` is using an incorrect filename
* Place all `asset`s correctly in `/_next/static/media` with `[name].[hash:8][ext]`
* Added a separate runtime chunk for api entries, without `publicPath`
* Introduce separate layer for api entries, which uses server-side URLs.
* Otherwise new URL() will return a faked relative URL, that is identical in SSR and CSR
* Disables react-refresh for api entries
Fixes#27413
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
* Update headings to clarify that we're describing. Add heading for Authentication API Routes
* Start adding API route examples
* Start adding API route examples
* Start adding API route examples
* Start adding API route examples
* auth: Replace clerk packages with @clerk/nextjs
* Add API authentication example to with-clerk
* Fix footer links
* Proofread, ensure consistency
* Update example's props to use new version
* Update example links
* Add rel tag to _blank link
* Obscure the authentication provider in the example
* Replace example
* Reset authentication docs, list Clerk as vendor
* Re-fix typo
* Change sample to example
* Add the example
* Update examples/with-clerk/package.json
Co-authored-by: Lee Robinson <me@leerob.io>
Co-authored-by: Peter Perlepes <p.perlepes@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lee Robinson <me@leerob.io>
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using [`#29179`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/29179)
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/29179
This PR makes two changes:
- It updates the index page to reflect the fact that `withSentry` should now be working for API routes deployed to Vercel.
- It changes the route which returns a promise rejection to be more obvious about the fact that that's what it's doing.
Fixes#16442
The current instructions on the Debugging page currently only work for server-side code, and furthermore, the page doesn't actually _say_ that they only work for server-side code.
This update adds instructions for debugging client-side code in both VS Code and Chrome DevTools. It also improves the suggested VS Code launch configurations to take advantages of some relatively recent features in VS Code's [built-in JavaScript debugger][1]. Using the `node-terminal` and `pwa-chrome` launch types removes the need to manually pass an `--inspect` flag to the underlying Node.js process.
[1]: https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-js-debug
Let me know if there are any edge cases I didn't consider with these VS Code launch configs!
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
* Remove inert font tag in font optimization
* Fix lint
* Remove inert font tag during font optimization
* Fix lint
* Fix lint
* Fix lint
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
After talking with markerikson, I've made some updates to the Redux examples:
- Updated the `with-redux` example to use the Redux Toolkit + TypeScript example
- Updated dependencies of `with-redux` to work with latest testing setup
- Removed `with-redux-toolkit` in favor of `with-redux`
- Removed `with-redux-toolkit-typescript` in favor of `with-redux`
- Removed `with-redux-code-splitting` in favor of `with-redux`
Includes a fix for when a tree is rendered without the styled-jsx registry being provided. It'll noop in this new version.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
This fixes segments inside of the host of the destination failing to parse with url.parse due to the unexpected colon by escaping the colon for segments and then unescaping them after we have parsed the URL.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/vercel/pull/6713
