## Documentation / Examples
This PR specifically calls out in more clear language how the rewrites function behaves. This tripped me up recently as I recently came looking for more information, and the documentation left me with more questions than answers. This is an attempt to clear up the confusion I walked away with for anyone who comes in after me.
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This commit allows the users to import URLPattern from `next/server`,
by defining a key that uses `global.URLPattern`.
Why is this any good? or: why don't we add URLPattern to the global namespace?
URLPattern is exposed as global on Edge Runtime _only_. This means that if we define a
constructor in global namespace in our TypeScript definitions, people might
have runtime errors in their Node.js functions.
Importing from `next/server` enables users to get the constructor without
risking in runtime errors and wrong type definitions.
Keep in mind, that with the current implementation, we do not check if the
constructor actually exists, but `next/server` shouldn't be imported in
Node.js functions, AFAIK.
## Related
- Fixes#38131
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This ensures we properly leverage the `assetPrefix` for `app`. Note for reviewing the test changes are mostly spacing so hiding that may help.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes: [slack thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C035J346QQL/p1659387244559979)
This PR fixes an issue where tests fail because the generated tmp directory already exists. This is likely caused from two tmp dirs being generated in the same millisecond.
```
Failed to create next instance [Error: EEXIST: file already exists, mkdir '/tmp/next-repo-1659368089063/packages'] {
errno: -17,
code: 'EEXIST',
syscall: 'mkdir',
path: '/tmp/next-repo-1659368089063/packages'
}
```
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/runs/7615808051?check_suite_focus=true
This PR adds a `fill` attribute to the future image component, that behave similarly to the fill mode on the existing image component.
Functionally, it mainly adds `position: "absolute"` and `object-fit: "contain"` to the image element, along with `height: "100%"` and `width: "100%"` to preserve the image aspect ratio. All of these can be overwritten by the user, except for `position: "absolute"`, which will throw an error. This is because changing that property without height and width is likely to cause layout shift.
Because we no longer have the wrapper element, this new version of `fill` requires that the user set `overflow: "hidden"` on the parent element themself, if they want that behavior.
This PR also includes several runtime checks to catch instances where the fill mode may provide unexpected results. These runtime checks warn if:
* The image doesn't have the `sizes` attribute and loads much smaller than the viewport
* The containing element does not have `position: "relative"`
* The image height value is 0
Co-authored-by: Steven <229881+styfle@users.noreply.github.com>
When we detect if `reactRoot` rendering should be enabled we `require` the require to check the version. But at that time the `NODE_ENV` isn't set yet. Then the react dev build stays in the `require.cache` that any future require of react will get the wrong build. In that case, React dev bundle is picked in production mode.
Fun fact: if you're using hooks, that seem not to effect you, but context consumer works different then you couldn't get the proper context from provider.
Fixes#38176Fixes#38765Fixes#38332
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
x-ref #39199
The change in #39199 isn't correct. Middleware manifest should only contain middleware route, so that when router navigates, it only try to apply middleware instead of checking all edge routes. This PR also changes the middleware manifest global value from array to object for easier access
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
In `Generating paths on-demand` section
It was mentioned that `getStaticProps` allows you to control which pages are generated during the build.
But `getStaticPaths` will allows us to control which pages are generated during the build.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Update `e2e/example.spec.ts` ([/docs/testing](https://nextjs.org/docs/testing#creating-your-first-playwright-end-to-end-test) page) to fix the failed test. Fixes: #39194
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using fixes #number
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see contributing.md
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using fixes #number
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [X] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see contributing.md
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running pnpm lint
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md?rgh-link-date=2022-07-13T09%3A09%3A13Z#adding-examples)
Otherwise build-native fails with "napi: command not found.".
Alternatively, this is missing from this package's devDependencies.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
P.S.: local copy fails `pnpm lint` due to the `target` subfolder with intermediate rust build artifacts... should I add a `.prettierignore` update to exclude `/packages/next-swc/target/`?
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
Previous next versions supported nested version of middleware, now we simplify it to one global middleware. This PR clarify the middleware and edge functions usage in dev server
Add `next/dist/client/components/shared/dynamic` as shared api which server and client components can both support.
Dynamic imports will be part of flight on server side.
This pr doesn't contain preloading part for client components.
Cleans up both Flight plugins and leverages type inference more.
- Rename plugin
- Update name
- Remove note on webpack5
- Add types for Flight manifest
- Use webpack5 type and tapPromise
- Remove any
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Closes: #30962
This PR adds a new `onReady` prop to `next/script` to handle shortcomings of the current `onLoad` prop. Some third-party providers and widgets require initialization code to run after the script's `load` event and every time the component is mounted. The `onReady` should solve that use case.
For more details, refer to the discussion in #30962.
CC @janicklas-ralph
## Bug
- [X] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [X] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
* test: cleanup telemetry integration test
Instead of constantly parsing the console output, parse the output
once, convert the entries in JavaScript objects, then compare them
logically rather than textually.
* Collect telemetry for next/future/image
Track adoption of next/future/image and add relevant test.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
The commit 0a781dd675 changes the docker examples to use `if..elif..else`
it is working fine tor the `with-docker` example, but not working for the `with-docker-compose` and `with-docker-multi-env` examples due to a missing semicolon.
Fix#39085
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This corrects some unhandledRejection errors showing when a connection is canceled with the edge runtime since the changes needed for 14463ddd10. This also adds a regression test to ensure we don't have these class of errors in our middleware tests.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes: [slack thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03Q1UU3Z4H/p1658960102013969)
(For context, the logic and tests have been moved to `app-render`.)
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Converted `cms-agilitycms` example to TypeScript to match Contribution docs.
## Documentation / Examples
- [X] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [X] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Fixes#39057
Will now show:
```
Warning: data for page "/[[...slug]]" (path "/some-page") is 256 kB which exceeds the threshold of 128 kB, this amount of data can reduce performance.
See more info here: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/large-page-data
```
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
