<!--
Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:
-->
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have a helpful link attached, see
[`contributing.md`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md)
## Related
* Closes https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/39146 - PR abandoned.
## Details
I was having the same issue at work, as a workaround, we've changed the
`largePageDataBytes` setting as advised but we'd like to keep the
warning ideally. It's something we need to address, but just don't want
to spam our log aggregators while the large data issue isn't resolved.
I believe I've more or less copied what was in the original PR, some
small differences:
* I use `Set` instead of `Map`, please let me know if there is an
advantage to using Map!
* Just to keep code a bit tidier (subjective) put an early return
instead of nesting all the code in an if.
* Added a test to verify only one log appears even when the page is
accessed twice [as requested
here](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/39146#pullrequestreview-1064486985).
- Enable newNextLinkBehavior. See #36436
- Run next/link codemod on test suite
Note that from when this lands on apps trying canary will need to run
the new-link codemod in order to upgrade.
Ideally we have to detect `<a>` while rendering the new link and warn
for it.
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Fixes#39057
Will now show:
```
Warning: data for page "/[[...slug]]" (path "/some-page") is 256 kB which exceeds the threshold of 128 kB, this amount of data can reduce performance.
See more info here: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/large-page-data
```
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [x] Related issues linked using fixes#33829
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
This adds a new test mode `next-deploy` which allows testing against deployments using the Vercel CLI. After running these tests they uncovered some bugs we need to correct before fully enabling. Patching the uncovered issues will be done in follow-up PRs and then after resolved this will be enabled to run after new publishes.
Tests that uncovered bugs to patch in follow-ups:
- [ ] test/e2e/getserversideprops/test/index.test.ts (req.url normalizing)
- [ ] test/e2e/i18n-api-support/index.test.ts (locale prefixed API routes matching)
- [ ] test/e2e/prerender.test.ts (/_next/data/build-id/ does not 404)
* Add experimental ifGenereated flag for unstable_revalidate
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
* update ifGenerated -> onlyGenerated
* rename const as well
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
