This corrects some unhandledRejection errors showing when a connection is canceled with the edge runtime since the changes needed for 14463ddd10. This also adds a regression test to ensure we don't have these class of errors in our middleware tests.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes: [slack thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C03Q1UU3Z4H/p1658960102013969)
(For context, the logic and tests have been moved to `app-render`.)
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Converted `cms-agilitycms` example to TypeScript to match Contribution docs.
## Documentation / Examples
- [X] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [X] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Fixes#39057
Will now show:
```
Warning: data for page "/[[...slug]]" (path "/some-page") is 256 kB which exceeds the threshold of 128 kB, this amount of data can reduce performance.
See more info here: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/large-page-data
```
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <22380829+ijjk@users.noreply.github.com>
- Add additional comments for reducer functions.
- Add comments for CacheNode
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Expand explanation of new router.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
A small refactor PR to convert some imports to type imports, as well as removing a couple of unused exports.
The Edge SSR loader is also missing the global process injection (`enhanceGlobals`).
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This relates to a bug from issue #38957 found inside of the `with-cypress` example as a result of the recent typescript conversion. This issue can be resolved with adding `export {};` which prevents TypeScript from reading `.ts` configuration files from being read as legacy script files. This issue has been resolved on StackOverflow [here](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56577201/why-is-isolatedmodules-error-fixed-by-any-import). More info on `--isolatedModules` can be read [here](https://www.typescriptlang.org/tsconfig#isolatedModules).
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [x] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
Fixes#38597
Expanded app-render.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This adds handling for prefetching `onTouchStart` as this gives a little more time to start parsing required scripts for a page transition if not already done that can help make the transition faster. This is based on research showing the touch start event firing on average `90ms` before click (x-ref: [source](https://instant.page/#:~:text=in%20the%20world.-,On%20mobile,-A%20user%20starts))
This also adds testing safari with playwright so we can run these in PRs instead of only after merge and adds initial mobile testing as well.
x-ref: [slack thread](https://vercel.slack.com/archives/C7PDM7X2M/p1658250170774989?thread_ts=1658249275.178349&cid=C7PDM7X2M)
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Lands #37431 again, but it only solves the re-render issue completely for the middleware case (closes#38267), not the `rewrites` case (#37139).
For `rewrites`, the blocker is `isReady` always being `false` initially and to match the markup on hydration we can't simply work around it without a re-render. Need to come up with another fix.
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Converted `custom-routes-proxying` example to TypeScript to match Contribution docs.
## Documentation / Examples
- [X] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [X] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
"You [SHOULD NOT](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2119#section-4) remove ~n~or edit it" in place of "You cannot remove it or edit it".
Rational:
- It is a strong recommendation; not a weak possibility.
- ~Both actions have a negative connotation; as such, it is appropriate to use "nor"~.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
Co-authored-by: Lee Robinson <9113740+leerob@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes grammatical typo found on line 73 of `docs/basic-features/data-fetching/get-static-paths`
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
x-ref: #38750
x-ref: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/pull/38750#discussion_r926203439
cc @ijjk
The PR implements the details about un-extractable fields in the `UnsupportedValueError`.
The PR also enhances the warning message about the unrecognizable `config` field. Now the warning message will look like this:
```
warn - Next.js can't recognize the exported `config` field in route "/unsupported-value-type":
Unsupported node type "CallExpression" at "config.runtime".
The default config will be used instead.
Read More - https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/invalid-page-config
```
The corresponding production test case has also been updated.
Ignoring files in `convex/_generated/` was a mistake: it's not the currently recommended workflow. Developers should be able to deploy just their frontend without deploying the most recent backend functions at the same time (which would regenerate these files). With this change, a default deploy to Vercel will no longer fail.
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [x] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
This line was introduced in #38862 to the base server but should only be useful for the Node.js server:
```js
addRequestMeta(req, '__NEXT_CLONABLE_BODY', getClonableBody(req.body))
```
It also introduces polyfill of `stream` to the edge server.
Here we add an abstract method to handle it differently, where only `__NEXT_INIT_QUERY` is used.
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
* Add example with cookies-next package
* Update examples/with-cookies-next/package.json
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
* add typescript and update cookies-next version
* Update examples/with-cookies-next/.gitignore
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
* add @types/node in devDependencies
* update cookies-next
* Apply suggestions from code review
* change the function naming to be consistent with the idiom of working with a container of cookies and prettier-fix
* lint-fix
Co-authored-by: Balázs Orbán <info@balazsorban.com>
Co-authored-by: JJ Kasper <jj@jjsweb.site>
This always seems to execute.
unless there is a special reason, I think it can declare and assign at the same time, how about this?
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm lint`
- [ ] The examples guidelines are followed from [our contributing doc](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md#adding-examples)
