* Preserve `next-env.d.ts` line ending
Prevent next from changing already existing line ending on
`next-env.d.ts` for no good reason
* Update comparison
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
* Update checks and add tests
* update test
Co-authored-by: Steven <steven@ceriously.com>
Co-authored-by: jj@jjsweb.site <jj@jjsweb.site>
See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6501 to see how I found this.
This line doesn't recompute layout in browsers, because `"height"` is given as a pseudo-element name rather than a property.
The right way to do what it wants is `getComputedStyle(document.body).height`, but given nobody noticed this (and this is generally never needed, manually triggering layout should never be needed to avoid FOUC) it seems better to keep current behavior and just remove the call.
This PR implements Internationalized Routing using formatjs / react-intl.
## Changelog
- Updated formatjs to latest version
- Remove deprecated babel-react-intl-plugin in favor of babel-formatjs-plugin
- Remove server in favour of Internationalized Routing
- Added linter with formatjs rules
- Refactored JSX
- Added missing types
- Auto run formtjs script via before hooks
- Adjusted readme docs
- Added message descriptions
- Removed default configs
fixes#27870
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [x] Make sure the linting passes
This PR proposes a fix for https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/11107 (JS modules are loaded twice). A more detailed explanation of the investigation that led to this PR can be found in the issue's comments (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/11107#issuecomment-791780168).
## Replicability
To identify that the issue replicates on any given project, you need to
1. look at the network tab (first/clean load of site, so preferably ⌘+⇧+R on an incognito tab),
2. sort by "name", and filter requests by `mime-type:application/javascript` (selecting "JS" in the devtools filters will actually show all "script" types, but ignore all "javascript" types)
3. look for pairs of identical calls with one originating from initial HTML (`preload` of priority "high" originating from "(index)" or "([page name])") and another one from a script (`prefetch` of priority "lowest" originating from a .js file), where neither of the files is served from the cache.
Here's a screenshot of an example of what to look for:
<img width="601" alt="Screen Shot 2021-03-07 at 09 59 18" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1325721/110234627-cf1c6d00-7f2b-11eb-9cd7-749bf881ba56.png">
The issue was reproduced easily on the following projects:
- On [nextjs.org](https://nextjs.org/) where duplicates add up to ~70kB of transferred javascript out of 470kB (14.9%).
- On [vercel.com](https://vercel.com/) where duplicates add up to ~105kB of transferred javascript out of 557kB (18.8%).
- On [tiktok.com](https://tiktok.com/en) where duplicates add up to ~514kB of transferred javascript out of 1556kB (33%).
- In my own project using `"next": "^10.0.1"` (private repo) where duplicates add up to about 5% of total transferred javascript.
- In the issue's comments, a developer reported a replication using `"^10.0.7"` on a [public repo](https://github.com/SidOfc/sidneyliebrand.io).
## Some information about the fix
- Both `preload` and `prefetch` values for `<link rel="x">` behave similarly, with the difference being in network priority level (preload is high priority, prefetch is lowest priority).
- Next.js uses `<link rel="preload">` in its initial HTML but then *only* uses `<link rel="prefetch">` for the rest of the lifetime of the page.
- However, when Next.js detects that a script should be requested in advance, it only checks for matching `<link rel="prefetch">` and not `<link rel="preload">` (which have higher priority and are present earlier in the DOM, thus have a greater likelihood of being already loaded).
This PR aims to fix that oversight.
## Potential issues (none AFAIK)
As far as I can tell by looking through the codebase, **there is no downside** not to add a `prefetch` when a `preload` is already in the DOM. No other script looks for a `<link>` based on its `rel` attribute.
* Fix bug where returning `{ notFound: true }` from GSP broke `next export`
We could just as easily omit the notFoundRoutes check, but I didn't want
to mask other potential bugs that would result in missing files
* update check
* move check
Co-authored-by: jj@jjsweb.site <jj@jjsweb.site>
Currently `new URL()` for server assets is completely broken because of the `publicPath` that is used for them too. `new URL()` for SSR is broken on windows as it's using absolute urls on the windows filesystem. And `new URL()` is using an incorrect filename
* Place all `asset`s correctly in `/_next/static/media` with `[name].[hash:8][ext]`
* Added a separate runtime chunk for api entries, without `publicPath`
* Introduce separate layer for api entries, which uses server-side URLs.
* Otherwise new URL() will return a faked relative URL, that is identical in SSR and CSR
* Disables react-refresh for api entries
Fixes#27413
## Bug
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [x] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
* Update headings to clarify that we're describing. Add heading for Authentication API Routes
* Start adding API route examples
* Start adding API route examples
* Start adding API route examples
* Start adding API route examples
* auth: Replace clerk packages with @clerk/nextjs
* Add API authentication example to with-clerk
* Fix footer links
* Proofread, ensure consistency
* Update example's props to use new version
* Update example links
* Add rel tag to _blank link
* Obscure the authentication provider in the example
* Replace example
* Reset authentication docs, list Clerk as vendor
* Re-fix typo
* Change sample to example
* Add the example
* Update examples/with-clerk/package.json
Co-authored-by: Lee Robinson <me@leerob.io>
Co-authored-by: Peter Perlepes <p.perlepes@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lee Robinson <me@leerob.io>
## Bug
- [x] Related issues linked using [`#29179`](https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/29179)
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Feature
- [ ] Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR.
- [ ] Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- [ ] Integration tests added
- [ ] Documentation added
- [ ] Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- [ ] Errors have helpful link attached, see `contributing.md`
## Documentation / Examples
- [ ] Make sure the linting passes
Fixes: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/29179
This PR makes two changes:
- It updates the index page to reflect the fact that `withSentry` should now be working for API routes deployed to Vercel.
- It changes the route which returns a promise rejection to be more obvious about the fact that that's what it's doing.
